 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 10:14 AM by schism85
|
reply to post by blueray
In all of the pictures, everything is blurry, not just the objects, except one. That had to be caused by an unsteady hand. The one pic that did not
show the objects, was not blurry at all.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 10:22 AM by AlexDJ
|
 Originally posted by flice
I know it's late in the thread, but noone mentioned exif data yet, so I thought I'd toss it in.
The images was shot on a Canon 350D on may 10th, around 21:10 (according to camera settings, which is probably wintertime so add 1 hour).
The lense used was a 17-70mm, which is a more or less common zoom lense for this camera. Iso speed on all shots was 1600, which along with the slight
underexposure of - 1/3 could account for the noise.
The fastets shutterspeed used without the flash was 0.3 secs, which is quite a long time. I've never met anyone who could hold a camera still enough
for a longer time than 1/60th of a sec to make a sharp or unshaken image. Normally 1/125th is the optimal to ensure no shake on a standart lense. If
you shoot on fx. a 120 mm you probably need 1/250th of a sec, etc etc.
Ofcourse given the lack of light the need of decreased shutterspeed and increased ISO was a natural.
Aperture varied from 3.5 to 4.5.
Images 0353 and 0354 (the ones where the streaking is downwards left to right) was shot on 1 sec... that's quite a lot and I'm not surprised by the
streaking. Even if the objects were stationary you'd get this streaking with a nonsteady hand. The images were taken 3 secs apart.
Images 0356 and 0357 (the ones where the streaking forms a u or v) was shot on 0.8 sec... again quite a long time. Those two images were taken 7 secs
apart.
Image 0366 (the one with the longest streak) was also shot on 0.8 sec. This however was shot at 70mm. Longer focal length requires faster exposure
time in order to get a sharp image. So a 0.8 on 44mm compared to 70mm is very different. The same amount of shake in both shots would look more
dramatic on 70mm than on 44mm.
In both mentioned cases autofocus was not enabled.
[edit on 12/5/08 by flice] 
Ok I have Canon Rebel too (XTi aka 400D)..after watching some of yours pics i can say this ..i suspected the ISO was high on the shots because of the
glow in the sky and sorroundings.. (iso 1600 very high)...so unless it was very dark i dont know why your friend use a very High ISO counting for
making the shots...RAW is excellent it keeps a lof of the data.
Using the ISO so high and on Manual mode made the pics look blurred (any shake at that high iso even with speed shutter very fast) can still show the
trace (buildings blurred)... So only one thing...nice catch..bad choice of setting for taking the photos!!!.. even if the objects didnt move at that
high speed (like you are saying or thats what i did understand) any shake would make the Objects look blurred and like in motion with that Iso.
More Higher the ISO you use, more Glowing and Pixelated the image will be, and this what happens on this pictures, high glow, pixelated (not so sharp
for a i think its a 8 megapixel cam) and on top of that any shake of your hand (not using a tripod) would surely induce blurring (like in all the
photos)... and wala thats what you get on your pics... about what did you catch..looks UFO's to me.. i just hope nex time you use automatic mode for
that...
Well thats what i see on your pics..anyway good luck and next time if your friends see another UFO use Automatic mode...this will save you a lot of
pain...using ISO's is not the best way with this type of things (makes thing messy unless you use a tripod).....
Hope this helps....
[edit on 13-5-2008 by AlexDJ]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 10:50 AM by TeslaandLyne
|
Originally posted by Teki187
Reflection of some kind, definitely not a ufo.
Try some UFO knowledge on the Tesla side.
Static electricity glows brighter then the sun.
And balloon people are fooling themselves as well in
not recognizing the electric way of flight.
Just because your government is ignorant of Tesla mechanics to
generate such a craft, you don't have to board the train of
their balloon and reflection excuses.
The Illuminati gravy train has everyone on board in the denial
of Tesla.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 11:02 AM by TeslaandLyne
|
reply to post by eltom
A luminous trail... 'angel hair' left up in the sky from saucers.
Back in the 50s it was on the ground when people used to
chase landed saucers around.
Not to go in to much of the theory but electric sparking can
make a lot of strange things and the man of many sparks is
the Tesla man.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 07:15 PM by setiguy2012
|
These are some of the best UFO photos I have ever seen. Great resolution, and the large file they are sequenced... good job!  
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 03:14 AM by pachacamaq
|
one of our board members recently posted the comment that there were 2 more sightings of some objects, both on the 10th of May 2008
over Magdeburg/Germany
over Hamburg/Germany
really interesting, can that be on the same day at least 3 German Cities? The weekend befor also at least one sighting. Witnesses say the could not
identify them as balloons or laterns. And me eather like I reported.
that´s all what is actually known. I think he is in touch with some flightcontrols and skywatcher communities, so I belive he will bring up soon some
more details. Hopefully.
cheers
[edit on 13.05.2008 by pachacamaq]
[edit on 13.05.2008 by pachacamaq]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 03:36 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
Appears to me that the noise was natural at a higher ISO setting i.e. 800-1,600 ISO which will give grain and also one tends to use higher ISO'S when
shooting in lower lit conditions such as this-i, as a photographer say that this is natural high ISO noise from the camera.Which camera was used for
these shots by the way?Just curious.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 04:06 AM by pachacamaq
|
2 more sightings reported:
10th May 2008 ca. 23:00 CET
over Gleiszellen-Gleishorbach/Germany
15-20 Light -Objects red/orange colour
Height: 100-200 meters
No position lights (Airplane)
No sound
Witnesses: 1
11th May 2008 ca. 21:30 CET
over Hückeswagen/NRW/Germany
6 Light-Objects red/orange colour
Flying in formation 2; 2; 2;
Witnesses: diverse people who joined a Birthdayparty
Ufo-Sighting Database: www.ufo-datenbank.de...
[edit on 13.05.2008 by pachacamaq]
[edit on 13.05.2008 by pachacamaq]
[edit on 13.05.2008 by pachacamaq]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 04:15 AM by pachacamaq
|
next Sighting:
12th May 2008 ca. 2:30 CET
over Hannover/Germany
25-30 Light-Objects orange coloured
Objects were flying with high speed/velocity
In a quit area were planes do not fly very often.
No sounds.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 05:21 AM by pachacamaq
|
Originally posted by child of light
I am not very good at this and I used the photos posted but I wanted to see if there were some kind of movement of the "objects" in a GIF animation
.. I might have some of the photos out of order but what do you guys think ?
the movement looks really similar to the sigthing I had
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 05:48 AM by blueray
|
The nice thing about the animation is also that the ufo's were moving at least at that speed.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 10:59 AM by blueray
|
BTW: Due to the high resonance i had to change hosts.
The raw's are now seperated and can be downloaded here:
blueray.zeroscience.org...
blueray.zeroscience.org...
blueray.zeroscience.org...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 02:56 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
The reason the pictures are blurry is because the shutter speed is slowed down in darker situations to allow more light in. If he was to take the
pictures with a fast shutter speed, the pictures would be really underexposed, and the pictures would probably be completely black. Also the noise is
the result of a higher ISO, which is the light sensitivity.
Sorry if this has been posted already, just trying to explain the basics.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 03:01 AM by pachacamaq
|
Originally posted by blueray
The nice thing about the animation is also that the ufo's were moving at least at that speed.
definately, I agreee with you, i had the same feeling about when i was thought about my sighting how the flightmovements were...
and exactly that´s it.
And they were flying at a similar height over the roof...
I guess the building had no more than 4-5 floors.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 03:42 AM by pachacamaq
|
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
The reason the pictures are blurry is because the shutter speed is slowed down in darker situations to allow more light in. If he was to take the
pictures with a fast shutter speed, the pictures would be really underexposed, and the pictures would probably be completely black. Also the noise is
the result of a higher ISO, which is the light sensitivity.
Sorry if this has been posted already, just trying to explain the basics.
One question:
you said noise? Is there a video available or what?
I haven´t seen anything yet.
thank´s
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 04:16 AM by RING0
|
These are the exact same objects that I saw on o4-14-2008 in the State of Illinois, Mchenry, IL, at 12:10pm. ATS post here,
My originalATS UFO Report
The color, shape and size all correspond with what I saw that day, I am 100% certain that these objects are the same thing I witnessed, there was an
earthquake a few days later in Illinois, so if there is an Earthquake in Germany soon, that would be significant. But the events may not be related,
the main point being that I believe these to be the very same things that I saw. I only saw one, and it disappeared right in front of me and turned
into a bright ball of light which then proceeded to rise almost straight up at great speed to infinity. This is a very exciting development for me,
the photos I took were useless, so to see that someone was able to get one image that shows them clearly is of GREAT interest to me! Still we should
realize that no amount of UFO images will ever be accepted as proof by the scientific community, these new images do supply another bit of evidence
that when taken together with many other sightings, provide a basis for a better understanding of the UFO phenomenon. My thanks to the original poster
from Germany, these things whatever they are, seem to be traveling all over our planet, we can only hope that they are not malevolent.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 04:20 AM by Smokersroom
|
Originally posted by pachacamaq
One question:
you said noise? Is there a video available or what?
thank´s
Noise is a term for visual artefacts on the shot, mainly due to adverse lighting conditions. Not noise in the aural sense.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 05:06 AM by pachacamaq
|
Oh I see, well thank´s a lot for my better understanding now.
I´m not an expert in these things.
..............................................................................
[edit: removed unnecessary quote of entire previous post]
Quoting - Please review this link
[edit on 15-5-2008 by 12m8keall2c]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 05:15 AM by pachacamaq
|
Originally posted by RING0
These are the exact same objects that I saw on o4-14-2008 in the State of Illinois, Mchenry, IL, at 12:10pm. ATS post here,
My originalATS UFO Report
The color, shape and size all correspond with what I saw that day, I am 100% certain that these objects are the same thing I witnessed, there was an
earthquake a few days later in Illinois, so if there is an Earthquake in Germany soon, that would be significant.
latest Earthquakes in Germany:
www.seismo.uni-koeln.de...
10 Quakes within the 10th May till the 14th May reported in Germany
Magnitudes from 0.8 to 2.4
latest Earthquakes in the World:
earthquake.usgs.gov...
[edit on 13.05.2008 by pachacamaq]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 09:37 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
Video of the photographs.See www.disclose.tv...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
