UFO over Germany, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 05:22 AM by bluepowder
reply to post by blueray



well... the same objects, the same night, same country only a couple hundred miles away, nearly the same time... this is getting kinda interesting... i'd be intrigued to see if there are nay more eyewitness-accounts coming on. i sure hope so. and man, do i wish i hadn't been too damn *snip* lazy to pull out my mobile and shoot some pics. idiot me... :-(



edit- profanity please review the T&C

[edit on 12-5-2008 by kleverone]



reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 05:52 AM by bluepowder
reply to post by PSP



well, with all due respect, i know what i saw, and i know what i DIDN'T see, and those objects may have been balloons or any other minsinterpreted thing of earthly origins, but they were surely not induced by some kind of light, as they clearly had a physical appearance and didn't look like any kind of light at all. so this can be ruled out for sure.


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 06:32 AM by flice
I know it's late in the thread, but noone mentioned exif data yet, so I thought I'd toss it in.

The images was shot on a Canon 350D on may 10th, around 21:10 (according to camera settings, which is probably wintertime so add 1 hour).
The lense used was a 17-70mm, which is a more or less common zoom lense for this camera. Iso speed on all shots was 1600, which along with the slight underexposure of - 1/3 could account for the noise.

The fastets shutterspeed used without the flash was 0.3 secs, which is quite a long time. I've never met anyone who could hold a camera still enough for a longer time than 1/60th of a sec to make a sharp or unshaken image. Normally 1/125th is the optimal to ensure no shake on a standart lense. If you shoot on fx. a 120 mm you probably need 1/250th of a sec, etc etc.
Ofcourse given the lack of light the need of decreased shutterspeed and increased ISO was a natural.
Aperture varied from 3.5 to 4.5.

Images 0353 and 0354 (the ones where the streaking is downwards left to right) was shot on 1 sec... that's quite a lot and I'm not surprised by the streaking. Even if the objects were stationary you'd get this streaking with a nonsteady hand. The images were taken 3 secs apart.

Images 0356 and 0357 (the ones where the streaking forms a u or v) was shot on 0.8 sec... again quite a long time. Those two images were taken 7 secs apart.

Image 0366 (the one with the longest streak) was also shot on 0.8 sec. This however was shot at 70mm. Longer focal length requires faster exposure time in order to get a sharp image. So a 0.8 on 44mm compared to 70mm is very different. The same amount of shake in both shots would look more dramatic on 70mm than on 44mm.

In both mentioned cases autofocus was not enabled.



[edit on 12/5/08 by flice]


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 08:11 AM by HaDeZz
reply to post by blueray



Strange, the same night me and a friend saw something in the sky above belgium (well actually it was after midnight already)
I first tought it was a star but it moved back and forth and even went in a circle 2 times.
It was small so i'm sure it was pretty far away from here.



reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 08:33 AM by flice
reply to post by AztecSpiritual



Good point... that they form the exact shapes, even during the streaking would logically mean one of three things

A. The objects are syncronized in their path of travel almost down to a tie.

B. The reason is camerashaking which would naturally create the same shape no matter what we see.

C. A mix of both...


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 09:03 AM by Did you see them
BLUERAY - Thanks for your pitures.
I had a similar sighting in Liverpool UK in January.
I joined a couple of sites to look for answers.
I made my initial report to Open Minds Forum here:[url=http://lucianarchy.proboards21.com/?board=ufosandextraterrestrial&action=display&thread=1047&page=1[/url]

GO JOIN OPEN MINDS FORUM - CANT POST A LINK HERE !!!!! - SO MUCH FOR SHARING INFO !!!

What I saw looked like about 100 orange/red balls moving slowly in a PERFECT straight line. I describe them as moving like beads on an abacus they were that precise.I took some photos with my son as we watched them pass low ( about 300ft ) overhead for about 10 mins. Some would materialise above me.Some would just wink out and the way they sparkled around the cicumfrance and the kind of light they gave off I will never forget.
THESE THINGS ARE NOT BALLOONS !

Here is an enlargment from one of my pics of one of these RED BALLS OF LIGHT. Why it looks like this NO one has been able to answer.It was just one of about 100 huge red lights going low over next doors garden.

i252.photobucket.com...



If you want here is my email I created in January just for this.
didyouseethem@gmail.com

PS If what Blueray has photographed was the same as I saw then to all the people who want to say "balloons" , or "Sky Lanterns" I say Bollocks !

and to all that want "disclosure" .... It's happening now !


[edit on 12-5-2008 by Did you see them]

[edit on 12-5-2008 by Did you see them]

[edit on 12-5-2008 by Did you see them]

[edit on 12-5-2008 by Did you see them]

[edit on 12-5-2008 by Did you see them]


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 10:06 AM by Zelong
reply to post by blueray


G'day blueray
What program is used to open these CR2-RAW files please.




reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 10:08 AM by flice
reply to post by CoNsPiRaCy PhReAk



Just curious, how do you mean no way to do it with a camera?
The streaking could be made with any cam on long exposure. Ofcourse that doesn't account for the glowing ability of the object itself. It's hard to make a precise judgement on the shape from a long exposure image


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 10:10 AM by flice
reply to post by Zelong



Canon DPP is one of the best.

Adobe Lightroom can do it.

Photoshop Bridge can do it.

But Photoshop tells limited infomation about the file, where I with DPP even can see the serial number of his camera.


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 10:20 AM by The Godfather of Conspira
reply to post by Did you see them



Uhh.. The picture you posted looks nothing like a red ball of light.
What is that a picture of exactly?

Looks like a cloudy, blue haze or something...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 27 member flags