Bush plan to attempt possible coup?

Bush signs unconstitutional "power grab" presidential directives NSPD51 and HSPD20, giving him full-dictatorial powers in the event of a loosely defined "catastrophic emergency."

Why would directives like this be made?

This is really scary.
The video speaks for itself:
Youtube link

[edit on 11-5-2008 by DwaynetheSpecious]

.Welcome. .This. .Is. .The. .New. .World. .Order.

Now ... I am Australian ... So I am not sure exactly how it all works ... But don't you think that the States, their governors and their National Guard would have something to say about that??

Arizona has opted out of all Federally declared martial law. I believe that this document is an excellent foundation for every state and will check the Federal government's overarching abuses of power.

N.S.P.D. 51 signed in May 2007. News sources say the administration are seeking it's implementation though a "false flag operation". www.tbrnews.org... I have posted about this very subject as it is very dangerously real. www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by DwaynetheSpecious


It's the paranoia cha cha!

So if there is a disaster...no one should take control?

Originally posted by crmanager
reply to post by DwaynetheSpecious

 

No paranoia cha cha. It's a presidential derective. www.whitehouse.gov...

It's the paranoia cha cha!

So if there is a disaster...no one should take control?

That's great that the government signed a piece of paper.

My question is:

"Will the American state governmental system and/or individual governors let a federal government controlled by Bush enforce martial law without a valid reason"

I say no.

What do you say?

That coup happened partially in 1913, and was finished in 1963.

This is the same type of directive signed by FDR at the beginning if WW2. Every President in the past directs the DOJ to write such an initiative in the event of catastrophy to the US. It has a time limit and must be redone periodically. States must adhere to it.
Zindo