It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A Fairfield man is in jail because his daughter hasn't gotten her General Equivalency Diploma (GED).
A judge ordered the father to stay on top of his daughter's education months ago and when that order wasn't followed, Brian Gegner was sentenced to 180-days in the Butler County jail.
The daughter, Brittany Gegner, says her father shouldn't be punished for her problems.
Especially, she says because she's now 18, an adult.
"It's ridiculously wrong," said Brittany Gegner.
"Of all the punishments they could have given him, to make him go to jail?," she asked. "I mean, probation – until I get my GED – would be reasonable, but to send him to jail? That's overboard."
Butler County Juvenile Court Judge David Niehaus ordered Gegner to jail for contributing to the delinquency of a minor by not following a court order which required Gegner to be sure his daughter got her GED.
A Fairfield man is in jail because his daughter hasn't gotten her General Equivalency Diploma (GED).
A judge ordered the father to stay on top of his daughter's education months ago and when that order wasn't followed, Brian Gegner was sentenced to 180-days in the Butler County jail.
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
This is about our government thinking that THEY own our children. What business is it for a court to issue such a decree. If its the Governments child then the judge should go to jail. Those of us with children know that to demand anything of our children is almost an impossibility with the laws and decisions being made by acedemia and the courts today! We, as parents, are damed if we do , damned if we don't!!!
Zindo
You are so right, we're not allowed to be parents anymore. When she was 16 and not going to school, had he dragged her kicking and screaming to make sure that she went to school, you can bet he would've then been charged with child abuse. Seems this poor man never had a chance, looks like the judge just had it in for him.
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
This is about our government thinking that THEY own our children. What business is it for a court to issue such a decree. If its the Governments child then the judge should go to jail. Those of us with children know that to demand anything of our children is almost an impossibility with the laws and decisions being made by acedemia and the courts today! We, as parents, are damed if we do , damned if we don't!!!
Zindo
...looks like the judge just had it in for him.
This has got to be one of thee most assinine things that i have ever seen !
First or all how can the judge punish the father because his daughter couldn't pass the math exam portion of the G.E.D. exam? How is that in any way his fault? What's he supposed to do take it for her? If she can't pass it she can't pass it, that's not the father's fault! And it's even more unjust because the problems that he's being punished for happened when the daughter was 16 and in the mother's custody, not his, both the mother and the daughter have admitted that.
Another thing the article says that the judge gave the order month's ago, not over a year ago and since the daughter is going to turn 19 soon, so yes she was already an adult when the judge issued the order. Also the article also states that she has an 18 month old baby, so even if she wasn't 18 when the judge issued the order she was still an adult. Unless the law differs where they live when a girl gives birth to a child she automatically becomes an emancipated minor, which means that she is a legal adult and her parents are no longer responsible for her.
Seems the father was doing the best for her that he could, he has her and the grandchild living with him, the man's gotta go to work doesn't he, can't be with her 24/7. How can a system that says that she is capable of being responsible for her own child say that she is not capable of being responsible for herself, its just ludicrus ! What if he loses his job, then will the punishment fit the crime ? His whole life could be ruined because of something that he had no control over.
If she was 17 and ran away this same system would say there's nothing we can do, she's months away from being an adult, the cops won't even look for a 17 year old run away. And where was this judge when she was 16 and messing up when she lived with her mother, funny how it was ultimitely the mother's responsibility and she got off scot free. That's just an insane ruling !