posted on May, 10 2008 @ 11:47 AM
Had a thought while I was out running this morning which I decided to pitch 'out there' to see what others think.
If one accepts the premise of NWO, 9-11 conspiracies, etc., then it has to be recognized that these people plan things years in advance. Is it
possible that the Clinton impeachment in the late Ninties was planned in order to allow less public pressure against a future Bush/Cheney impeachment?
Here's my thinking:
The Clinton impeachment basically divided people into three camps: support, against, don't care. The loudest voices were obviously Support vs
Against, and importantly, even voters who consider themselves Independent/Swing had strong views. It was a tiring experience, but watching from the
sidelines it was clear from the start that even though they went through the impeachment, Clinton was never going to get more than a slap on the
wrist. So, what was the real reason behind it?
Here's my contention:
The purpose was to wear down the general public's taste for impeachment, especially the Independent/Swing voters, and 'cheapen' impeachment as a
concept, to where it would be harder to impeach future presidents.
I have to admit that for awhile when I heard people calling for Bush/Cheney's impeachment, I just rolled my eyes and said, "you're just a partison
democrat looking for revenge." Impeachment HAS been cheapened and the only people who seem to support for Bush/Cheney are generally either (A) hard
core democreats or (B) those who truly believe they are involved with NWO and/or 9-11 conspiracy, etc.
It's all about controling the mood of the greater population, and if they can make impeachment seem like a cheap partison tactic rather than a legit
method of removing corrupt leaders, then they've essentially increased their power.
OK, throw your stones...