 |
reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 07:29 PM by JmanFIVEk
|
 JmanFIVEk, your wrong, period. 
It's "you're", not "your." And no, I am not wrong. What did you say? When god created the "original animals?" What the hell are you talking
about? What exactly are "original animals?"
Never mind, don't bother replying please. I don't think anyone should put any stock in your understanding of the animal kingdom. Stick to make
believe, it suits you better.
[edit on 12-5-2008 by JmanFIVEk]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 04:36 AM by miriam0566
|
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Of course it doesn't say this is a bad thing. The Bible is basically a guidebook on who you, as a slave, are beholden to. It's not going to tell you
slavery is a bad thing - slavery is the entire reason for your existence. You serve no purpose, biblically, other than to enrich your mortal superiors
and give eternal obeisance to your god when you die.
Maybe that's what you want - as you say, it's pretty ordered, and some people need that kind of order in their lives. But myself? I would sooner die
- or kill - than be a slave to any man or god. And I would do the same to prevent you from such indignity, just the same. 
i dont feel comfortable talking about this. all i have to say is that the bible has a very different view of slavery than man does. however, i
understand why you feel the way you do.
 And so the children must pay for the sin of their parents. A common theme to Christianity. Not only is every human being absolutely, eternally
damned because of Adam and Eve, but every child is likewise burdened by the sins of their parents. The message? You, as a human being, are worthless.
The only way you acquire worth of any degree is, again, by giving yourself over to a life of slavery. 
you have it the wrong way around. you have to look at it from the top down. an isrealite´s family was everything. if he sinned and caused shame to a
son and his son on to 10 generations. it was plenty of incentive not to do.
suffering from the sins of you parents, and even the sins of adam and eve dont make you worthless. it just shows that your actions affect others.
there are plenty of examples outside the bible where human nature shows a child paying for the sin of his father.
but in the end, it is what you do about it. in the end you stand before god alone to answer for YOUR sins, noone elses.
no not at all. the scripture was talking to people who where already slaves. if you were a slave and saw jesus talking and decided to become
christian, then jesus was telling you to pay the dues placed upon you. suddenly becoming christian wasnt an excuse to run away or defy your master.
much like governments. governments are there because god allows them until his kingdom takes over (ill find the scripture, i dont have it off hand
sorry)
till then, even if the governments are unjust, jesus says pay what you owe. if the government demands taxes, then pay the taxes.
if sins wages are death, that means doing anything that is not treating your neighbor with the love you would expect is worthy of death.
barbaric to you yes, but if everyone followed it then the world would be a happier place
 Unless of course, she doesn't cry out. In which case it's considered an affair. See above. 
still alot better than islamic countries, where they punish the woman and the man goes free.
 A system that benefits the rapist - biblically, women were not allowed to refuse their husband. Nor was beating the hell out of your wife a
crime. Bad news: You just got raped. Worse news: You'll relive that experience whenever your rapist wants you too.
But so long as you obey him with trembling and fear, you'll be able to go to heaven to kiss hte feet of hte god who set up this system. Now
that is generosity 
what if the father refuses the bride price? nothing to say he cant
ive seen a few, unfortunatly i could count them on one hand. *sigh*
[edit on 13-5-2008 by miriam0566]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 06:27 AM by audas
|
Originally posted by chise61
Originally posted by audas
[Americans feel they have the right to express their religious zealously no matter the consequences]
I am sorry that we (Americans) offend you with our belief that we have a right to "express" our beliefs. However you must remember that our country
was founded on the beliefs of "Freedom of Speech" and "Freedom of Religion" . Hey guess what we "AMERICANS" even have a contsitutional RIGHT (in
America) to do so.
- [it is similar to the pro-slavery movement - the idea of abolition was unthinkable and so America lagged a century behind the rest of the western
world - as it still does on religion. ]
On this point you must remember that compared to other countries we are a very new country, so if you feel that we are still a century behind, maybe
that could be the reason. Maybe you suggest that we should advance to the level of some countries where people are still tortured and killed for
thier religious beliefs.
[Religious extremists, such as Christians]
And what kind of extremist are you that you choose to group all christians in the category of "religious extremists" ?
etc..............
  
Total inability to take responsibility for their actions. Christianity is an organised religion - as such there is a collective responsibility. AS a
Christian you are responsible for the actions of your organisation - if you do not wish to answer for the actions of the Church - remove yourself from
it and join the millions of enlightened people who have moved beyond the simplicity and intellectual, moral, ethical baseness of Organised
Religion.
Like it or not, Christianity is a profoundly evil construct design specifically as a taxation, to dominate the masses, and subjugate the world as a
power structure, it is a well documented historical fact. Simply because the nefarious creators of this myth, and its modern proponents, have played
upon mans natural inclination to mysticism and presented their power structure with a "moral" façade does not in any way dispel the reality of
where this religion came from, why it was created, for what purpose and the the actions which have been carried out in its name. There is no moving
beyond historical fact - no matter "how good" it makes you feel to be associated with an organisation responsible for more death, mayhem and human
suffering than perhaps any other institution.
The idea that you wish to selectively highlight certain aspects and divest any association with others does not there fore make it so - Christianity
IS all these things - as a Christian you are part of this.
The fact that as a Christian you can not accept that your churches transgressions does not mean that you are not responsible, or that they are not
true - it simply means you are incapable of accepting reality and taking on the burden of responsibility for your churches evil practices.
Just because you WANT your church to be good doesn't mean it is.
Freedom of Expression and Religion goes both ways - if you wish to belong to what should be a criminal institution which should be brought up on
charges for crimes against humanity then you should also understand that people will find this reprehensible and subsequently have every right to
express their HORROR that such an archaic, despotic, corrupt and inhumane institution still exists. We have the right to say no more of this charade.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 07:40 AM by Clearskies
|
reply to post by audas
Which church did what?
Can I have examples?
The Inquisitions?
Following Jesus and going where other believers are is not the same as worshiping a man or leader as the supreme king on earth!
Men will do evil. It's in their bones to do it at some point.
How much evil is predicated upon their will and morals.
Churches with POWER and false dogmas will ALWAYS take man's souls into slavery to their church, But,
Jesus gave us principles to love God first and our neighbor as ourselves.
Not our Church.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 04:57 PM by Torsten
|
Why does religion always raise the hackles of Man? Why do people continually have to fight over who's God is better? Its like being in grade school
and picking a fight over who's father is the toughest. We all have faith in SOMETHING. No one has the right to take that away from anyone. I am not a
Christian, but I respect and admire Yeshua. He was what every human being has the capacity to become; he said so himself. The Bible has parts that do
not sit well with me; however, I have no right to judge it as BAD because I don't like it and no one else does either. It is a matter of faith, and
faith cannot be proved or disproved. Stop fighting and arguing; no matter from which faith or religion you come from everyone worships the same God,
just in different ways.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 07:52 PM by CharlesMartel
|

Originally posted by AlexG141989
"Women should be silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak, but should be submissive, as the law also says."(1 Corinthians
14:34)
"If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter into life maimed, rather than having two hands, to go to hell, into the
fire that shall never be quenched." (Mark 9:43)
"One of illegitimate birth shall not enter the congregation of the Lord." (Deuteronomy 23:2)
"Slaves, obey your human masters with fear and trembling, in the sincerity of your heart, as to Christ." (Ephesians 6:5)
"If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the
young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her." (Deuteronomy 22:28-29
"It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid." (Luke 16:17 )
is this truly what you believe???

I am surprised you didn't include "There is no God." which appears in 15 verses. The most famous is
Psalm 14:1. Of course context is everything.
If you don't believe me follow the link to the verse.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 09:47 PM by chise61
|
Originally posted by audas

[Total inability to take responsibility for their actions. Christianity is an organised religion - as such there is a collective responsibility. AS a
Christian you are responsible for the actions of your organisation - if you do not wish to answer for the actions of the Church - remove yourself from
it and join the millions of enlightened people who have moved beyond the simplicity and intellectual, moral, ethical baseness of Organised
Religion.]
And what makes you think that i am part of any church? A Christian church is an organized religion, i am simply a Christian. I'm sorry but as a
Christian i am responsible for my actions alone, no one elses, especially the church's. The heads of the church and the members that do wrong are
responsible for the actions, not the whole congregation.
Just what actions do you speak of anyway ? Can you give me some examples of the actions that you wish to hold me responsible for ? Do you speak of
perhaps the Spanish Inquisition ?
Thank you but i am already enlightened just as you feel that you are, we are just enlightened by different beliefs that niether one of us can say is
right or wrong.
[ no matter "how good" it makes you feel to be associated with an organisation responsible for more death, mayhem and human suffering than perhaps
any other institution.]
Again you ASSUME that i am associated with an organization. No organization makes me "feel good". What makes me feel good is the fact that God loved
me enough to send his son to save me and that Jesus loved me enough to die for my sins.
And would you please be so kind as to tell me what deaths, mayhem, and human suffering that "my" church has caused? Since you keep insisting that i
am part of a church you must also "know" what church i am a part of.
[The idea that you wish to selectively highlight certain aspects and divest any association with others does not there fore make it so - Christianity
IS all these things - as a Christian you are part of this.]
I am sorry but again you are wrong. As a Christian i am only part of a group of people that believe that Jesus Christ is our Lord and Savior. Being a
Christian does not in itself make me a part of any church or organized religion, it simply makes me a believer in, and a follower of Jesus.
[The fact that as a Christian you can not accept that your churches transgressions does not mean that you are not responsible, or that they are not
true - it simply means you are incapable of accepting reality and taking on the burden of responsibility for your churches evil practices.]
Again i ask what church do you speak of ? You will need to be a little more specific here as i know not which church you refer to. You still have yet
to give me any examples, let alone facts of the "evil practices" that "my" church has carried out, that you expect me to carry the burden of.
[Just because you WANT your church to be good doesn't mean it is.]
Again what church????? You keep talking & talking about the same thing over & over again, but yet you say nothing.
[Freedom of Expression and Religion goes both ways - if you wish to belong to what should be a criminal institution which should be brought up on
charges for crimes against humanity then you should also understand that people will find this reprehensible and subsequently have every right to
express their HORROR that such an archaic, despotic, corrupt and inhumane institution still exists. We have the right to say no more of this charade.]

And here it is AGAIN . I would really like to know just exactly what it is that you insist that i belong to? You're right these freedoms do go both
ways. I however was speaking about the fact that in America we have freedom of speech and religion in the context that it seemed to offend you so much
that we Americans felt that we could say what ever we felt, and yes we do have that right as Americans IN AMERICA. It doesn't seem to offend you that
you freely speak your mind whever it is that you're at, but it seemsd to bother you that "Americans" speak thier mind.
My comments were mainly pertaining to the fact that you managed to attack a religion, a whole nation, and all it's people in one post. I do notice
that you did not respond to my statements or questions. Would you care to answer the question " what kind of extremist are you that you group all
Christians into the group of an extremist religion ?"
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 09:54 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
This really isn't fair. The Bible is a collection of Jewish writings complied by Europeans. Those books were written by a diverse group of people
over a very long period of time. Jehovah's character and judgement varies greatly in the Old Testament alone, not to mention that Jesus carefully
nullified many of the old Hebrew laws.
The modern canon is only one manifestation. Even modern groups of Christians don't agree on what books are "valid" and which aren't. (Though
their criteria is often purely modish . . .)
People should read the thing and drop all the crap they learned. They should read multiple translations from a variety of sources. Read it for what
it is and you will find that these writers were brilliant. That's why the writings persist. Like Led Zeppelin. Instant Classics.
Now, let's talk about the Book of Enoch and WHY it was so revered at one point and then dropped from the canon very suddenly....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 11:29 PM by djerwulfe
|
The previous anonymous post was mine.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 04:12 PM by nightmare_david
|
Originally posted by miriam0566
Originally posted by nightmare_david
The only thing that ever upsets me are people who push others into a certain belief. I think everyone should be able to choose for themselves whatever
belief they want to follow. When people force their ideas and beliefs on to others, that's when I feel they take it too far. That, IMHO, is what this
thread was trying to do and I agree that it's getting pretty old. 
i hate to say this but hes not forceing anything.
there is a difference between forcing you beliefs and simply showing them.
noone is standing behind you with a gun telling you to believe his post. he has the same right to voice his opinion about religion as christian does
spreading the gospel 
I never said I believed anything in his post. What I said was I don't like when people force their beliefs on to others. Clearly thats what the
person was trying to do here. I also never said he didn't have the right to do voice his opinion.
He took quotes from the bible out of context to push HIS BELIEF.
You took what I said and completely twisted it around and even added things.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 03:27 AM by miriam0566
|
Originally posted by nightmare_david
What I said was I don't like when people force their beliefs on to others. 
what does a person have to do to force their beliefs on others? when i think of force, i think of the inquisition. or the holocaust. romans forced
their beliefs.
all he did was quote some scriptures and ask a question. OKay, the scriptures are out of context and he doesnt have all his ducks in order. but i
would hardly say thats forcing.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 01:23 PM by Chewy82
|
Its clear to see you dont believe in what you have read and its easy to pick and choose what to write and reed. Although by far most of your quotes
are from the old testament and while you may not even bother to try and understand what your have written you should at least choose to write and
quote more from the new testament. After all when Jesus was born he mostly talked about love, and loving each other, and more so loving your enemy as
you would yourself, which is in itself a promotion of peace. You have quoted small samples and not the full excerpt, and is a waste of time for all
who have read your jibes as they are not relevent. You have basically got into your head that religion is useless so you will write about useless
quotes.
Yes these are quotes, but the bible aint harry potter, and not ment to be an easy reed.
Your quote regarding chopping your hand off, I would be interested to hear what you think it means, I understand what it means but its clear to see
that people like you who cant look beyond there own front door, cant see what it means.
You also have to understand that while the old testamont like detreometory, was written in an era of more than 6000yrs ago..... and incase you hadnt
noticed times have changed, and while you go on about the bible in general, what about the koran, which still uphold these laws of 6000yrs ago.
So before you go about trying to get a rise out of people, and starting a debate about things you clearly no nothing about, try taking up talking
about; is harry potter real or not, as thats clearly more closer to your brain cells, although i can imagine it might even struggle with dealing with
that!!!!!!
[edit on 15-5-2008 by Chewy82]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 12:20 PM by AlexG141989
|

Originally posted by Chewy82
Its clear to see you dont believe in what you have read and its easy to pick and choose what to write and reed. Although by far most of your quotes
are from the old testament and while you may not even bother to try and understand what your have written you should at least choose to write and
quote more from the new testament. After all when Jesus was born he mostly talked about love, and loving each other, and more so loving your enemy as
you would yourself, which is in itself a promotion of peace. You have quoted small samples and not the full excerpt, and is a waste of time for all
who have read your jibes as they are not relevent. You have basically got into your head that religion is useless so you will write about useless
quotes.
Yes these are quotes, but the bible aint harry potter, and not ment to be an easy reed.
Your quote regarding chopping your hand off, I would be interested to hear what you think it means, I understand what it means but its clear to see
that people like you who cant look beyond there own front door, cant see what it means.
You also have to understand that while the old testamont like detreometory, was written in an era of more than 6000yrs ago..... and incase you hadnt
noticed times have changed, and while you go on about the bible in general, what about the koran, which still uphold these laws of 6000yrs ago.
So before you go about trying to get a rise out of people, and starting a debate about things you clearly no nothing about, try taking up talking
about; is harry potter real or not, as thats clearly more closer to your brain cells, although i can imagine it might even struggle with dealing with
that!!!!!!
[edit on 15-5-2008 by Chewy82] 
"Your quote regarding chopping your hand off, I would be interested to hear what you think it means"
i think what this means is that if something in your life makes you sin, let go of it... and actually fyi i've never seen any of the harry pottter
films
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 12:55 AM by pureevil81
|
Originally posted by Alcove
A few people have brought up the issue of OT commandments being valid. They aren't. They were laws given to the Isrealite people by God. They aren't
applicable after Christ's death.
Hebrews 8:6-10:18 discusses this. It talks about the old covenant (agreement) being temporary.
"The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming--not the realities themselves." from Hebrews 10:1.
ALLis0NE, why do you say that the 10 Commandments are all anyone needs to worry about? Everything God says is important.  actually with the new
covenant which jesus ushered in he said to keep the commandments,not sure where you come up with that.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |

<< 2 3 4 5 >>
|
|
|