This topic is in the Aliens & UFOs discussion forum.  (rss)


NASA UFO Files: Ufo Hunters episode 13 Video-Is that what NASA going to Announce on may 14??


<<  2    3    4    5  >>



reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:12 PM by ufo reality


It's 1:11 Eastern US time.

I hate .ram so I can't listen. Please post as soon as you hear the announcment!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:18 PM by _Phoenix_


Why can't I see anonymous, it says your the last poster, but I can't see.....

Edit: haha ok, sorry about that, I guess I added to the one liner lol.

[edit on 14-5-2008 by _Phoenix_]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:21 PM by worldwatcher


You can't see it because it's a one liner that doesn't contribute to the discussion.

to everyone joining the discussion, please watch the use of one liners in this thread.

ABOUT ATS: Warnings for one-line or short responses

thank you.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:23 PM by Anonymous ATS


It was for ufo reality, the huge announcement has nothing to do with aliens, ufos or anything reguarding discloser, just a super nova.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:27 PM by Anonymous ATS


The answer I gave was short because the question that was asked before it warranted a short answer. What i posted was that the nasa press conference announced that they found a Super Nova.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:31 PM by dreb13


The press conference is about the discovery of reminance of a super nova. No ET disclosure or anything Alien related. I don't see what the big deal is that NASA felt the need to announce that they were going to have press conference last week and build up all of this anticipation. Why not say "we found reminance of a super nova" last week?

[edit on 14-5-2008 by dreb13]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:35 PM by Anonymous ATS


reply to post by 123space



I believe if...anything happens, NASA is going to announce a reduction in research and progress, c/o Bush.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:38 PM by antmax21


If anything happens, NASA is going to announce a reduction in research and progression, c/o Bush.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:38 PM by cosmicstorm



Originally posted by dreb13
I don't see what the big deal is that NASA felt the need to announce that they were going to have press conference last week and build up all of this anticipation. Why not say "we found reminance of a super nova" last week?

reminance of a super nova.... could they not have just posted that on their site??? ive waited all day for that???

[edit on 14-5-2008 by dreb13]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:48 PM by ufo reality



Originally posted by antmax21
If anything happens, NASA is going to announce a reduction in research and progression, c/o Bush.


If you think Bush was bad for NASA, just wait if Obama is elected President. He wants to slash the heck out of NASA.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 12:56 PM by cosmicstorm


So was that definitely it?? the remnants of a supernova? anyone have any more info?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 05:45 PM by Anonymous ATS


Makes sense, they were looking for supernovas forever, i am not dissapointed by this. If this was about that dark energy or dark matter than i would have been. For anyone who cares about space science this is big.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 06:39 PM by zorgon



Originally posted by ufo reality

If you think Bush was bad for NASA, just wait if Obama is elected President. He wants to slash the heck out of NASA.


KEWL Now I know who to vote for




reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 06:42 PM by zorgon



Originally posted by worldwatcher
You can't see it because it's a one liner that doesn't contribute to the discussion.

to everyone joining the discussion, please watch the use of one liners in this thread.

thank you.


Really? Interesting... he must have had a lot one liners then in many threads, because I too notice him listed as last poster, but no post there... something I have noticed before only with the three amigos...

So just who is this Mr Anonymous really?

Hmmmm

So what's the big deal about a supernova? Hubble has already photographed one...


image source: http://imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hu/db/2005/02/images/g/formats/web_print.jpg



And there is THIS one...


THE BRIGHTEST exploding star, or supernova, ever seen has been recorded by scientists from US space agency NASA, who report a similar event may be ready to go off in our own galaxy.

Astronomers say the finding of the supernova — known as SN 2006gy — suggests that violent explosions of massive stars were common in the early universe.

"This was a truly monstrous explosion, a hundred times more energetic than a typical supernova," said the University of California's Nathan Smith, who led a team of astronomers on the project.


image source: http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/05/08/0905N_SUPERNOVA_narrowweb__300x386,0.jpg


Massive supernova proves illuminating

So this in't 'the first time' Hubble has lots of images of nebulae from supernovas

I don't get the hipe and buildup




[edit on 14-5-2008 by zorgon]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 11:26 PM by miguelbmx


let the "nasa didn't tell us truth" conspiracy begin
i thought i had seen some super nova pictures somewhere thanks zorgon.

[edit on 14-5-2008 by miguelbmx]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 10:22 PM by zorgon


Okay seems the big deal was that they hadn't seem any supernova's in OUR galaxy since 1680...

Apparently astronomers expect 2 to 3 exploding stars per galaxy per century...

like ummm they figured this out how? I mean the few short years mankind has been ABLE to see other galaxies... well okay that is main stream science for ya... come up with crazy ideas and get tenure 9and a paycheck )

So the big deal of the announcement was that they found one...

science.nasa.gov...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 01:04 PM by TheEnlightenedOne


If the 'truth' (actual UFOS, seen day and night and physically touching them) never gets here, don't expect NASA to collaborate in this.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  2    3    4    5  >>







Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

































ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, ,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.124 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread