It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA UFO Files: Ufo Hunters episode 13 Video-Is that what NASA going to Announce on may 14??

page: 5
4
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:12 PM
link   
It's 1:11 Eastern US time.

I hate .ram so I can't listen. Please post as soon as you hear the announcment!




posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:15 PM
link   
Supernova


big deal



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:17 PM
link   
Nasa announced, are you ready for this? A super nova. *sigh*



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:18 PM
link   
Why can't I see anonymous, it says your the last poster, but I can't see.....

Edit: haha ok, sorry about that, I guess I added to the one liner lol.

[edit on 14-5-2008 by _Phoenix_]



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:21 PM
link   
You can't see it because it's a one liner that doesn't contribute to the discussion.

to everyone joining the discussion, please watch the use of one liners in this thread.


ABOUT ATS: Warnings for one-line or short responses

thank you.



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:23 PM
link   
It was for ufo reality, the huge announcement has nothing to do with aliens, ufos or anything reguarding discloser, just a super nova.



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:27 PM
link   
The answer I gave was short because the question that was asked before it warranted a short answer. What i posted was that the nasa press conference announced that they found a Super Nova.



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:31 PM
link   
The press conference is about the discovery of reminance of a super nova. No ET disclosure or anything Alien related. I don't see what the big deal is that NASA felt the need to announce that they were going to have press conference last week and build up all of this anticipation. Why not say "we found reminance of a super nova" last week?

[edit on 14-5-2008 by dreb13]



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:35 PM
link   
hmm..it is about supernova...nothing shocking news..i wonder if there will be any official announcement about UFO from any government at all

affe - Malaysia



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:35 PM
link   
reply to post by 123space
 


I believe if...anything happens, NASA is going to announce a reduction in research and progress, c/o Bush.



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:38 PM
link   
If anything happens, NASA is going to announce a reduction in research and progression, c/o Bush.



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by dreb13
I don't see what the big deal is that NASA felt the need to announce that they were going to have press conference last week and build up all of this anticipation. Why not say "we found reminance of a super nova" last week?

reminance of a super nova.... could they not have just posted that on their site??? ive waited all day for that???

[edit on 14-5-2008 by dreb13]



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by antmax21
If anything happens, NASA is going to announce a reduction in research and progression, c/o Bush.


If you think Bush was bad for NASA, just wait if Obama is elected President. He wants to slash the heck out of NASA.



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 12:56 PM
link   
So was that definitely it?? the remnants of a supernova? anyone have any more info?



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 05:45 PM
link   
Makes sense, they were looking for supernovas forever, i am not dissapointed by this. If this was about that dark energy or dark matter than i would have been. For anyone who cares about space science this is big.



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 06:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by ufo reality

If you think Bush was bad for NASA, just wait if Obama is elected President. He wants to slash the heck out of NASA.


KEWL
Now I know who to vote for





posted on May, 14 2008 @ 06:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by worldwatcher
You can't see it because it's a one liner that doesn't contribute to the discussion.

to everyone joining the discussion, please watch the use of one liners in this thread.


thank you.


Really? Interesting... he must have had a lot one liners then in many threads, because I too notice him listed as last poster, but no post there... something I have noticed before only with the three amigos...

So just who is this Mr Anonymous really?

Hmmmm

So what's the big deal about a supernova? Hubble has already photographed one...





And there is THIS one...


THE BRIGHTEST exploding star, or supernova, ever seen has been recorded by scientists from US space agency NASA, who report a similar event may be ready to go off in our own galaxy.

Astronomers say the finding of the supernova — known as SN 2006gy — suggests that violent explosions of massive stars were common in the early universe.

"This was a truly monstrous explosion, a hundred times more energetic than a typical supernova," said the University of California's Nathan Smith, who led a team of astronomers on the project.




Massive supernova proves illuminating

So this in't 'the first time' Hubble has lots of images of nebulae from supernovas

I don't get the hipe and buildup

:shk:


[edit on 14-5-2008 by zorgon]



posted on May, 14 2008 @ 11:26 PM
link   
let the "nasa didn't tell us truth" conspiracy begin

i thought i had seen some super nova pictures somewhere thanks zorgon.

[edit on 14-5-2008 by miguelbmx]



posted on May, 15 2008 @ 10:22 PM
link   
Okay seems the big deal was that they hadn't seem any supernova's in OUR galaxy since 1680...

Apparently astronomers expect 2 to 3 exploding stars per galaxy per century...

like ummm they figured this out how?
I mean the few short years mankind has been ABLE to see other galaxies... well okay that is main stream science for ya... come up with crazy ideas and get tenure 9and a paycheck
)

So the big deal of the announcement was that they found one...

science.nasa.gov...



posted on May, 16 2008 @ 01:04 PM
link   
If the 'truth' (actual UFOS, seen day and night and physically touching them) never gets here, don't expect NASA to collaborate in this.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join