5 nations may present new Iran offer in person, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 8-5-2008 @ 08:08 AM by LOYAL

5 nations may present new Iran offer in person


ap.google.com
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senior envoys from five of the six nations bargaining with Iran over its disputed nuclear program may try to get talks moving by making a special face-to-face appeal, U.S. and European officials said Wednesday.

Diplomats could deliver a new offer as soon as this weekend. They want Iran to scale back a nuclear program that the West fears could lead to a bomb.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 08:17 AM by pavil
reply to post by LOYAL



Nice contridiction there.

Iran will not be detered in it's quest for obtaining all the pieces to create nuclear weapons. Any offer that doesn't allow them to enrich and involves in depth inspections will be dead in the water from the Iranian side. Any offer that does not stop Iranian enrichment and doesn't involve detailed inspections and safeguards will be meaningless paper on the other side.

Should make for a great presidential debate topic in the fall.



reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 08:21 AM by LOYAL
reply to post by pavil



i thought Israel would be on agenda when West make negotiations with them, if Israel is not on agenda then it all negotiations would mean nothing.... !!!!


reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 09:30 AM by pavil
reply to post by LOYAL



Israel is not a participant of the NPT and thus does not have to have to submit to inspections ect ect. Iran is a signer of the NPT and is bound by that agreement till it gives notice that they are leaving the NPT. Linkage of the two will not happen.

Iran's offer is basically a delay/smokescreen effort to take the focus off of them. Under the NPT they are bound by certain things, regardless of what Israel, Pakistan, N. Korea and India do.


reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 09:52 AM by RabbitChaser
reply to post by pavil



Under the NPT they are bound by certain things, regardless of what Israel, Pakistan, N. Korea and India do.


They are bound to certain things because of a treaty... in theory.

So is the U.S.... has that stopped "certain things" from occurring during this war, due to other treatys that we signed and were supposedly "bound" to? Once again, the double-standard is at play here. Why should we expect anyone else to be a 'country of their word' with any treaty when we cannot lead by example...?

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 14 hours ago, 109 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 10 hours ago, 93 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 12 hours ago, 50 replies