reply to post by Myrdyn
I agree with Riposte. The physical effects observed are simply
attributed to the theoretical model called a black hole. However there are
other theoretical/laboratory based models that produce very similar observable physical effects that have nothing to do with black hole type
gravitationally based theory. Rather than admit this, mainstream cosmology is rooted and indeed can not remove itself from its gravitationally based
paradigm, to the point where more suitable explanations are literally ignored. The masses of people mop up whatever Nasa and the scientific-academic
establishment spew out, regardless of how accurate and reality based it is.
If they announce that they found a Black Hole (which they have announced lots of times), they are actually only announcing: "we have observed effects
that are similar to the effects theorized within black hole theory." They could just as easily announce: "we have observed effects that are similar
to the effects theorized within ALL THESE OTHER VALID theories." But that isn't going to happen, because Nasa is a mainstream Shill and propaganda
head for the gravitationally based cosmological paradigm.