It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So in your hypothetical example, if an accused rapist or murderer exercises their constitutional right to not testify, this means that they are guilty?
Although, what if they are leaving so many holes in the story that people will eventually try to rise up and then they will have an excuse to exert full power?
According to former CIA officer John Kiriakou, al-Qaeda logistics chief Abu Zubaydah claimed that the attack of 9/11 was only meant to be a "wake up call." Zubaydah aparrently also said that they did not believe there would be such a loss of life, and that they did not intend to provoke the subsequent response by the United States.
John Kiriakou stated specifically, "They didn't think the buildings would collapse...That's what he told me."
Originally posted by jackinthebox
In point of fact, we have been under martial law for a very long time, but that is for another thread.
Oh, I'm sorry you feel that way.
You have just id'd yourself to me as an extremist Libertarian. And you know what I already think about them.
Originally posted by Quarantine
Tell me the truth about what happened September, 11th 2001. The only truth you can give me is the fact that Osama Bin Laden masterminded a terrorosit attack on America and succeeded. It may sound far out, but investigators have yet to prove otherwise.
If 9/11 was "an inside job", prove it.
Originally posted by Karras
I find it hard to believe the controlled demolition theory because anyone in any country, not just in the U.S., can review the evidence for themselves.
Shouldn't we see an outcry of Russian, Chinese, European, African and Latin-American scientists pointing out all the flaws in the official story? So far, I know Fidel Castro of Cuba and Hugo Chavez of Venezuela have said that there probably should be a new investigation - probably because of political motivation.