It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Osama bin Laden is a fake: picture proof within

page: 4
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in


posted on May, 8 2008 @ 06:47 AM
reply to post by Monsieur Neary

I'm holding a cover of the december 24, 2001 issue, it shows a riot in the street most likely in afganistan or iraq. If I can get to a scanner you'll have the information I do; otherwise I need another credible website then the one you posted and I can't find one (little fishy that there's only one site). You don't have to believe me, proof to myself is all I ever wish to attain I could careless about others intelligence.

posted on May, 8 2008 @ 07:52 AM
reply to post by Lokey13

You've got big ones my friend. First, you inform the poster you didn't even bother reading what he has to say, and now you're telling him to read a bit better what you have to say before he responds? Who exactly are you? And why should your posts be worth reading and not his? Also, your "proof" that you say you're holding means bupkiss until you post it.

posted on May, 8 2008 @ 12:36 PM
reply to post by Threadfall

wow haha maybe you don't get that i know that he has existed. what i'm trying to say is that he his is no longer around, i would explain it but just read all of my other posts.

posted on May, 8 2008 @ 09:31 PM
reply to post by Lokey13

For ALL of YOU who think that newsweek cover is a fake and that the picture on it isn't real!

HERE IS YOUR PROOF that this newsweek cover is REAL! i went completely out of my way today because i could not find a picture on the internet and went to THE LIBRARY! is that a credible enough source for you?! they didn't have a copy of the magazine in print so i had to use a machine because the whole magazine was on a clear slab in small frames so they had to be brought up in that machine that zooms in on them and allows you to look at the pictures blown up on a screen in front of you. so i really don't know what issue you are holding onto because it's not the one from december 24th, 2001

and also as a side note look in the top left hand corner it clearly reads december 24th, 2001 and in the bottom left it states "from the bin Laden tape released by the pentagon"

i had the lady print it off as clear as possible but its a negative of it, but you can still tell that it is the exact same one as what i posted!


Here's the link THE PROOF!
(you can zoom in)

C'mon people flag this!!!! We need to open others minds to the possibilities!!!!!!

[edit on 8-5-2008 by baseball101]

posted on May, 8 2008 @ 11:17 PM
reply to post by baseball101


haha true i would be but actually i didn't get it from a mass media source it's actually from another website on conspiracy's

Not a snippet from a news source? Nope, you are quite right it is not.
Your entire first post is a copy& paste from a post on another conspiracy web site. (until your 5th edit after the first page of this thread was complete) However, Joe’s (the original poster in the other forum) source is not given, except for the Newsweek cover. This practice is at best, poor form.


i probably should have had the link there in the first place

And it could quite possibly a violation of this:

Now this could all be considered honest mistakes by someone who has been here for just a few days, and truly, that is how I am taking it. As a newbie myself, (3 months) I spend 10x more time reading here than posting. And so, in the interest of denying ignorance,
I will direct you to a thread where this whole topic was thoroughly discussed er.. trashed in 2003. Here:

I agree with William on this thread who said

Why don't people do more homework on stuff like this?

Now a mod will most likely, come along and edit this post and give me a warning about my quoting, or some such. Certainly my disclaimer should read: Just trying to help make
ATS a better place for all.

Look Ma….no edits….Thanks spellcheck

posted on May, 8 2008 @ 11:18 PM
reply to post by baseball101


and i know for a fact that the mass media would not be a reliable source.


And that is exactly the source of your so called photo-proof.
Quite a contradiction, don’t you think?

posted on May, 9 2008 @ 06:40 AM
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.

posted on May, 9 2008 @ 06:43 AM
reply to post by baseball101

Great research baseball, I'm wondering if they took this cover out of print? Because I'm not lieing when I say I have the same date and it shows a picture of a muslim riot on the cover. Definently not Osama on the cover of that though, could it be a possibility that they took the picture of a impersonator then quickly changed covers after the mistake? I'll do my best to get this cover on. You got yourself a Flag and a star, good job.

posted on May, 9 2008 @ 10:46 AM

Originally posted by Lokey13
reply to post by baseball101

Great research baseball, I'm wondering if they took this cover out of print? Because I'm not lieing when I say I have the same date and it shows a picture of a muslim riot on the cover. Definently not Osama on the cover of that though, could it be a possibility that they took the picture of a impersonator then quickly changed covers after the mistake? I'll do my best to get this cover on. You got yourself a Flag and a star, good job.

that is a very interesting possibility ya it was a great find when they told me they didn't have it in print i was like what? haha but luckily they had it on file, that's very interesting how you have a different cover, they could possibly of switched the covers. that intrigues me because this was the only copy of that issue of magazine that they had on file, but that could just be because it was the original. i don't but you have brought up a good point

posted on May, 9 2008 @ 06:29 PM
reply to post by baseball101

Ya I think the best possibilty is that they changed the cover, very interesting indeed.

As for my other post that was blocked, I never picked a side on whether or not Osama is alive or dead. The original poster said I had said he was alive and clearly didn't read my post at all because I stated I had no opinion on the matter: simply wanted proof. Also next time if you could stick to something which that you were involved.

posted on May, 11 2008 @ 06:49 AM
lol the differences are obvious unless osama gave up his weight loss program and gained a few pounds coz he wasnt cave hoping to avoid the US marines....

posted on May, 12 2008 @ 02:47 AM
reply to post by runetang

Faux News reported that OBL believed to be killed years ago.
Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader.

posted on May, 31 2008 @ 09:17 PM
reply to post by Zeptepi

I am the author and owner of Theconspiracyzone which originally broke the article. I don't mind if people cut and paste and post. I'm not in this for my ego. I'm running this website so people can get the word out. This is about informing the people what their own government is doing to them. It is my feeling the government gets away with this because people don't know what the hell is going on. Anybody who takes this article and tells EVERYONE about it is okay with me even if I don't get credit for it. My only motivation is for people to know there is a trojan horse in our government and the destruction is coming from within. If this knowledge is spread fast enough maybe we can stop more innocent lives being lost in the next staged terror event.

Joe Monoco

You can write me at:

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 03:47 PM
reply to post by vanosman

nice find!

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 07:41 PM
Osama is still out there. There was tons of reports saying that he is dead. The recent report that I heard about Osama Bin Laden, was that he died when he got shot by like 20 something bullets after his rampage through a neighborhood.

True story. I'm talking about the elephant named Osama Bin Laden. :p

In all honesty, I'm pretty sure he's still alive today. If Osama were dead a new leader would emerge anyway. If that next person dies then another and another would emerge and so on. The leader is the one that has the most training experience, and most senior.

posted on Jun, 16 2008 @ 09:02 PM
reply to post by Shrukin89

i understand your reasoning in saying that there would be a replacement for Osama but what's to say that they're just covering it up to keep bin Laden's legacy afloat?

posted on Sep, 25 2008 @ 11:33 PM
Bin Laden died, and Al-Qaeda was ripped apart by the Western Intellegince agencies years ago. He was the primary source of funds for the entire organization. They do not have nearly what is required to fight for 5 years in Iraq, and afhgnaistan, and still be doing operations all over the world.

A lot of terrorist reports are blamed on Al-Qaeda to fuool the world into believing there is still a reason to invade natuions "harboring them" for the atrocities of 9/11 that can never be forgiven. The truth is it is either local resistance fighters, or intelligence agencies taking out a target and spreading fear, thus killing two birds with one stone.

What month and year is that neweek article? Back issues can be ordered from here and they got back all the way back from 1933-present.

they also have an 800 number

1. Want it FAST? Call us NOW.
Toll free in the U.S. 1-800-877-9887

2. FAX us your order NOW: (972)932-6048

3. Send E-mail to

So validating that issue should not be an issue

[edit on 9/26/2008 by DYepes]

posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 11:17 AM
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions

posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 02:22 PM
Well if you are giving them out, than yes I will take a cookie. I doubt Bin-Laden got a nose job, thus making the "official" picture a different man. That indicates a lie on quite a grand scale. But you probably enjoy the government lying to you anyways.

posted on Sep, 26 2008 @ 06:21 PM
bin laden comes from the house of saud,

the same house of suad whos prince was the first civilian on the space shuttle,the same house who is good friends with the bushes till this day,the same house who had bought countless billions worth of arms from usa.

we hear that royals families are often illuminati,ie grays,whats to say the royal family of saudi arabia isnt,the countries named after them anyway;-).

you may want to consider the main goal of the grays is depopulation and project bluebook.
bin laden serves both,creating a figure to create hatred,and religious war,and secondly to cause a conflict that will result in the destruction of isreal which is the crown in the jewel of project bluebook(fake end times you see).

you may want to remember it was the cia who armed the mujahadeen in the 80's thus creating bin laden and his powerbase,yet again the cia causing actions that result in depopulation,so many,so many,beyond co incedence.

new topics

top topics

<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in