The antivirus software conspiracy, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 65 times


reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 02:50 PM by Blaine91555
This must be what they are talking about.

Link to article.
Symantec Corp. has admitted to using a rootkit-type feature in Norton SystemWorks that could provide the perfect hiding place for attackers to place malicious files on computers.


The anti-virus vendor acknowledged that it was hiding a directory from Windows APIs as a feature to stop customers from accidentally deleting files but, prompted by warnings from security experts, the company shipped a SystemWorks update to eliminate the risk.



reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 02:53 PM by Blaine91555
Another source of the same information.

Link to article.
Security vendor Symantec has admitted to using a rootkit-like technology in its Norton SystemWorks appliction.

The company admitted in a security advisory that the technology hides a directory from the user and the operating system.

"Files in the directory might not be scanned during scheduled or manual virus scans. This could potentially provide a location for an attacker to hide a malicious file on a computer," the vendor stated.




reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 02:56 PM by Sublime620
reply to post by Blaine91555



That's not even close to what they are accusing them of. It's dangerous, but not the same.


reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 03:14 PM by Blaine91555
reply to post by Sublime620



Those articles are old so it could just be people are remembering the details wrong.

My experience with the same package mentioned in the articles was all bad. I can only speak from the experience I had. I purchase a new computer with it preinstalled and it took two days before I demanded instructions on how to do a full uninstall which they provided after repeated requests and a phone call. All the problems went away.

I personally have had nothing but a good experience with McAfee and again all I can do is relate my experiences.


reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 03:17 PM by Sublime620
reply to post by Skyfloating



Yeah, but it's kind of like any giant software company. AOL is the same way. So is Earthlink's software.

I'm not sure why they operate this way, but they love to make software completely intrusive and hard to get rid of.

Companies can't get away with the stuff that's being accused of them on this thread.

Look at what Sony tried to get away with:

Sony DRM

Sony DRM

Sony DRM

Sony Rootkit

The worst part was, when you tried to delete the registry keys, it made your CD player completely quit working.

Computer users generally are too savvy and these sorts of things will get caught onto eventually.

**Edit:

And I'm sure one reason they make antivirus software hard to uninstall is so that it isn't easy to code a virus to remove the software before it attacks.

[edit on 7-5-2008 by Sublime620]


reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 03:23 PM by Blaine91555
reply to post by Skyfloating



Considering the money involved, I have no problem suspecting there is some nonsense going on. For me however, since a computer being down can cost me thousands in lost income, I find paying to be the smartest choice. For casual users though, the free route is most likely the best way to go.

Even if what we suspect is true, other than the free alternatives, there is not much we can do about it. I do think the majority of malicious stuff is homespun crap by children acting like children, combined with adult actions form the sociopathic types who get sick pleasure out of it.

If a virus shuts my office down for a day, I loose all my profits for a whole week. I'm all for the death sentence for virus authors whoever they are!



reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 03:54 PM by WoodyAcres
Originally posted by ianr5741
Don't like viruses? Switch over to Linux. It's 100x more secure, and FREE! And none of the code written into it is a secret, unlike M$ Windows.


Again, this is very true. And as I said above, I believe in Linux - but come on now, how many out there really take the time to go through the source code to understand what is going on?

Don't get me wrong, as I said in a previous post, I use Linux for all of my external firewalls, but it simply is not a panacea as so many people think. I'm not suggesting we have a "my-OS-is-better-than-your-OS" flame-fest (particularly since Linux clearly wins... ) But I am suggesting that while it is easier to get a virus on Windows it is a whole lot easier for me to get root on your Linux machine. (And conversely, for you, or the NSA, or whomever, to get root on my Linux machines).

As I mentioned though, the scariest thing of all is this beast (behemoth, really) called "selinux" developed by the NSA and with DoD style access controls. All of the National Labs must now run selinux - even on the desktop machines whether on the unclassified or classified networks - it's that good. But, it is also incredibly hard to understand what is truly going on and (for me at least, who has been struggling with selinux for over a year now) to understand how easy it is/would be for the NSA to pop a module in to say, one of my web hosting servers that I might not even have physical control over and if I would even notice this! I mentioned "Carnivore" (the FBI's data-mining and TCP/IP wiretapping software) in another thread. Why wouldn't it be easy to (or at least easier) to write an selinux module, pop it into your ISPs server(s), maybe with or without their consent (most likely with, given the request by Bush et. al. for telecom immunity) and then you no longer have to worry about putting random TCP/IP packets back together - which is very much non-trivial!

Selinux is flexible enough to do that kind of logging (I've personally written modules along those lines). "But it's not on my own computer" one might object - well. sure - there is no need for it to be. So long as there is a fully digital hop somewhere in the path (and there is for nearly everything these days - even land-line phone circuits generally take at least one digital hop) then there you go - voila!

So what's the best thing to do these days? Just give in. Be assimilated...

Woody



reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 03:57 PM by WoodyAcres
I find this an interesting statistic:

(Anti-virus industry surges ahead...)


News Article - Monday, June 26, 2006 10:18
Filed under: IT Security & Business Continuity
The anti-virus industry is riding high on the back of growth in malicious software, according to research from Gartner.

The analyst revealed that the industry grew 13.6 per cent in 2005 to generate revenue of $4 billion, with future expansion looking likely.


Sure, it's 2006 data - but with numbers like that methinks I'm in the wrong business! So the goal here is create both the best virus/trojan/rootkit/etc. and then along with that to create the only software capable of finding and killing it. If your virus/trojan/etc. is good enough, then you just slightly change the code and the associaited name with it and your in business!

All fun aside, I'm not so sure that ALL such malware is created along those lines.... Some people are just curious as to what can actually be done. To the programmers out there: haven't you ever just wanted to know how hard/easy it is to infect as many people as possible? LOL!

I loved the comment ealier in this thread about the "white hat" division of an anti-virus company and the "black-hat" division. "Hello? Symantec Black-Hat Division, how may I ruin your day?"

Woody


reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 05:48 PM by verylowfrequency
Originally posted by me262
However, the AV companies are guilty of hiring virus writers once released from jail. Remember Kevin Mitnik?


Sorry, but
Kevin Mitnick did not stoop to writing viruses he was hacker who is much more brilliant than any idiot making viruses. Get your story straight before dropping names. He now has his own consulting company and probably makes as good or better money off his speaking engagements.

I don't understand the myth of virus authors being decent at anything as most are script kiddies adding to other peoples code and out to waste peoples time and money like a tagger painting his name on a building to say hey look paint sticks.


[edit on 7-5-2008 by verylowfrequency]


reply posted on 7-5-2008 @ 05:56 PM by KarmaIncarnate
Originally posted by jimmyjackblack
It is a fact that these anti-virus companies create viruses and there programs are used for viruses and stuff.
I know this because a friend of mine used to be a hacker and used to do IT for the goverment (he's had topsecret access to things like HAARP and stuff).


You're claiming hearsay from some unnamed friend who "used to be a hacker" as fact? Facts rely upon evidence, and I'm afraid this statement of yours doesn't meet muster. Please try to restrain yourself from perpetuating such myths. If you can provide some sources or evidence of anti-virus companies creating and releasing virii into the wild, then certainly, I'm all ears. For your reference, such facts would come in the form of legal cases won and documented in the press or admissions by said companies or employees of said companies again in the press.

Also, to clarify, companies such as Symantec using trojan-like capabilities to ensure the persistence of their software is not evidence of such a conspiracy. The same techniques that virii/worms/trojans use to do their work have very legitimate purposes as well.


Originally posted by jimmyjackblack
Use Spybot Search and Destroy, it's open source so the developers are'nt getting paid so they have no hidden agenda.
It's the only thing I use of my compy and it works great.


Spybot Search and Destroy is not an antivirus product, it is an adware and spyware detection product and only marginally effective at that taskl. There are plenty of malware that Spybot doesn't detect and cannot remove. You're welcome to consult google with the search terms "spybot spyware 'can't remove'" if you have doubts.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 14 days ago with 86 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 8 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 18 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 10 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 15 days ago with 57 member flags