This topic is in the War On Terrorism discussion forum.  (rss)


Did Bill Clinton pass up a chance to kill Osama bin Laden?




Topic started on 6-5-2008 @ 09:11 AM by baseball101

DIGG ATS

for original
content
more info

Did Bill Clinton pass up a chance to kill Osama bin Laden?


www.factcheck.org

Clinton: So we tried to be quite aggressive with them [al Qaeda]. We got – well, Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in 1991, then he went to Sudan. And we'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America. So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have. But they thought it was a hot potato and they didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan.
(visit the link for the full news article)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 09:11 AM by baseball101


Just imagine what this world would be like today if they would have actually accepted the offer from the Sudanese. This has been debated for a while but I believe the Clinton Administration really did refuse the offer. They could have imprisoned Osama right? I mean, I think knowing that someone wants to attack the US is good enough to lock them up, along with the knowledge that he funded terrorists back then.

www.factcheck.org
(visit the link for the full news article)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2008 @ 10:32 AM by dave420


reply to post by baseball101



Due process is a bitch, huh? We scream for that right for ourselves, yet at the drop of a hat we're willing to sell it down river just to feel safer.

The problem with Clinton capturing OBL is that OBL hadn't done enough to warrant it. The US, no matter how entitled its government (or people) might view it, is simply not allowed to round up people and hold them with no evidence of a crime being committed.

Baying for Clinton to break the law to stop someone else from breaking the law seems rather silly.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-5-2008 @ 09:58 AM by Conspiracy Theorist


reply to post by dave420





The problem with Clinton capturing OBL is that OBL hadn't done enough to warrant it. The US, no matter how entitled its government (or people) might view it, is simply not allowed to round up people and hold them with no evidence of a crime being committed.



Really? Then what is Camp Delta at Guantanamo Bay for?

May I point your attention to

David Hicks


He was captured by a "Northern Alliance warlord" near Kunduz, Afghanistan, on or about 9 December 2001 and turned over to US Special Forces for $1000 on 17 December 2001.[26][19][29] Hicks's father Terry, when interviewed, said "David was captured by the Northern Alliance unarmed in the back of a truck or a van. So it wasn't on the battlefield at all."[


Hey for $1000 a head, I'd be handing in everyone. [/sarcasm]

After being detained since 2001, he ultimately plead guilty to "providing material support to terrorists."

A long way from the attempted murder charges they also tried to get him for.

In May, 2007 he was returned to Australia and served a total of 8 months in an Australian prison.

CT



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:






ATS MIX Podcasts:


Recently Added Videos















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,


















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.016 seconds
Page processed in 0.093 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

thread