Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

"Repugnants"

page: 8
0
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
I mean, seriously, you all are a bunch of repressed sick homosexuals. From where I got my info, there's more stuff on yourvile depravity. And then you wonder why I call you repugnant? The nerve.

Did you read, "Blinded by the Right?" I DID! It's chock a block full of repugnant homosexuals ON FIRE, BURNING, cominG on to each other in in the dark in Dupont Circle in DC. Why do you even bother? Just accept my words and and move on....or do something decent and leave the party.

[Edited on 2-3-2004 by Colonel]


So does that mean you dont have any proof and I should just blindly follow your instructions? Isnt that the direct opposite of what you argue in relation to questioning the churchs story about Jesus being white?




posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:25 PM
link   
For someone so patently offended by "meaningless tirades of poorly constructed insults" why are you now so intent on sucking me into your little world with them?

You ARE an antagonist and need to look no further than your last post to me to see that. Everything about you I've seen so far from your insults and challenges to me to your willingness to attempt to out Colonel Colonel to the very vanity title you selected "There's a new Sheriff in town" says one thing: ANTAGONIST.

Which is fine. Except your whole arguement against the Colonel is that he's one.

And please don't take my declining your invitation to "dance" for anything other than what it is: Wisdom.

I've learned that there's one thing braggart bully egomaniacs like you hate more than anything...

Being ignored like you deserve. :shk:



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent47


So does that mean you dont have any proof and I should just blindly follow your instructions? Isnt that the direct opposite of what you argue in relation to questioning the churchs story about Jesus being white?


How many website news articles do I have to post? How many books do I have to recommend that you read? Maybe you should thoroughly READ the LAST news article website about the gay/child sex ring before you continue any further, repugnant.

Watch, it'll take treeboy another day to recover from this last lashing.

[Edited on 2-3-2004 by Colonel]



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:30 PM
link   
Is a movie quote really that vain?

You can ignore me; I'd rather welcome the occasion, actually. I don't have a problem with you, Colonel, or anyone else here outside of this thread, and now I'm through with Colonel; he's started doing what I wanted people to do in this thread.

Now, if you'd kindly drop the matter, we can watch this play out.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xenographer
and now I'm through with Colonel;


This guy has GOT to be high. BWHAHAHAHAHA!



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xenographer
Is a movie quote really that vain?

You can ignore me; I'd rather welcome the occasion, actually. I don't have a problem with you, Colonel, or anyone else here outside of this thread, and now I'm through with Colonel; he's started doing what I wanted people to do in this thread.

Now, if you'd kindly drop the matter, we can watch this play out.



Dude dont even try to act all high and mighty now...

the name of the thread equals..."I want to argue with colonel"......So dont act like arguing like this is above you becase no matter how you try to word it..starting a thread called "repugnants" means only one thing...That you wanna fight with colonel....

The more you try to deny that the more of a hypocritcal instigator you look like....{theres been a rash of these self rightous fight starters it seems}

I dont think your imppressing anyone by fighting with colonel in every other thread...seriously

all IMO of coarse



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by McGotti

I dont think your imppressing anyone by fighting with colonel in every other thread...


and getting your ass kicked.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by McGotti

I dont think your imppressing anyone by fighting with colonel in every other thread...


and getting your ass kicked.



Looks like all the members of the Colonel gang are heare. OR would you call them groupies?



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:42 PM
link   
Thats pretty stupid of you to say agent..im far from a groupie im merely pointing hypocrites when I see them.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by McGotti
Thats pretty stupid of you to say agent..im far from a groupie im merely pointing hypocrites when I see them.


Fair enough, by the way, have you heard of the research threads or did you receive any of the u2us I sent down the line for you.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:43 PM
link   
No, people just don't like hypocrites.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:45 PM
link   
I never said or implied that I wanted a fight with Colonel. I saw the term "repugnants" being used heavily, here and in other places, and decided to ask why. It had NOTHING to do with Colonel, his viewpoints, or his arguments; I wanted information.

I'm not trying to pretend that arguing is below me. I'm trying to pretend it's below all of us. I thought this board had a decently civil atmosphere for organized debate, but I was obviously wrong.

All I want is to be left alone, and to find some things out. I don't get what's so tough about that.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:46 PM
link   
I wanted information.
well you got your info and proceeded to bitch about it.


so......



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:47 PM
link   
Hey, the
monkey boy posts a news article!
Let's just see what the morally straight (according to him) side has been up too, shall we?

Here then is the list of former Democratic members of Congress who were convicted or pleaded guilty to major offenses between 1992 and 1999:
Nick Mavroules, Massachusetts Democrat: tax evasion, accepting illegal gratuity (1992).
Albert Bustamante, Texas Democrat: racketeering (1993).
Carroll Hubbard, Kentucky Democrat: fraud and corruption (1994).
Carl Perkins, Kentucky Democrat: fraud (1994).
Charlie Rose, North Carolina Democrat: financial-disclosure irregularities (1994).
Larry Smith, Florida Democrat: tax evasion (1994).
Walter Fauntroy, District of Columbia Democrat: financial-disclosure misdemeanor (1995).
Gerald Kleczka, Wisconsin Democrat: arrested for DWI (1995 and 1990); convicted DWI (1987).
Mel Reynolds, Illinois Democrat: sexual misconduct (1995).
Walter Tucker, California Democrat: extortion (1995).
Charles Wilson, Texas Democrat: paid $90,000 fine to Federal Election Commission (1995).
Joe Kolter, Pennsylvania Democrat: fraud and conspiracy (1996).
Dan Rostenkowski, Illinois Democrat: mail fraud (1996).
Mary Rose Oakar, Ohio Democrat: financial-disclosure irregularities (1998).
Austin J. Murphy, Pennsylvania Democrat: vote fraud (1999).

Some shining examples of the Clinton Administration Legacy
The only president ever impeached strictly on grounds of personal malfeasance
Most convictions and guilty pleas
Most Cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
Most witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47
Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33
Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61
Number of congressional witnesses who have pled the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122 (9/99)
Estimated number of witnesses quoted in FBI files misappropriated by the White House: 18,000
Number of witnesses who developed medical problems at critical points in Clinton scandals investigation (Tucker, Hale, both McDougals, Lindsey): 5
Problem areas listed in a memo by Clinton's own lawyer in preparation for the president's defense: 40
Number of witnesses and critics of Clinton subjected to IRS audit: 45
Number of names placed in a White House secret database without the knowledge of those named: c. 200,000
Number of women involved with Clinton who claim to have been physically threatened: 5 (Sally Perdue, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Elizabeth Ward Gracen)
Number of men involved in the Clinton scandals who have been beaten up or claimed to have been intimidated: 9
Number of times Hillary Clinton said "I don't recall" or its equivalent in a statement to a House investigating committee: 50
Number of times Bill Clinton said "I don't recall" or its equivalent in the released portions of the his testimony on Paula Jones: 271
Number of times John Huang took the Fifth Amendment in answer to questions during a Judicial Watch deposition: 1,000 Larry corrected this figure and says it has grown to 1934 and with more testimony to come is expected to exceed 2000 and become "a new indoor world record".
Visits made to the White House by investigation subjects Johnny Chung, James Riady, John Huang, and Charlie Trie. 160
Number of campaign contributors who got overnights at the White House in the two years before the 1996 election: 577

Most democrats are not very good at history. Combine that with their love of smear tactics and you get examples of proud ignorance like these:
One liberal democrat I used to work with loudly proclaimed that the 1968 Tet Offensive was the result of President Nixon's warmongering policies in Vietnam. Nice try, but Nixon was elected in November of 1968 and didn't take office till January 1969. Tet occured on democrat President "Micromanage the War" Johnson's watch.
"The Selective Service draft was obsolete when that doddering fool Raygun reinstated it anyway." Once again, Nice try. Selective Service was reinstated in 1979 by democrat President James Earl "Jimmy" Carter III in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Notice how in addition to getting the facts wrong, this democrat mananged to slip in multiple insults. So much for rational, reasoned debate...

And the BIG FUN FACT about the Colonel's morally top tier crew...

Another example of sleazy democrats in action.
Jessie Jackson has added former Chicago democratic congressman Mel Reynolds to the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition's payroll.

Reynolds was among the 176 criminals excused in President Clinton's last-minute forgiveness spree. Reynolds received a commutation of his six-and- a-half-year federal sentence for 15 convictions of wire fraud, bank fraud & lies to the Federal Election Commission.

He is more notorious however, for concurrently serving five years for sleeping with an underage campaign volunteer.

This is a first in American politics:
An ex-congressman (a democrat) who had sex with an unaged subordinate won clemency from a president (a democrat) who had sex with a subordinate, then was hired by a clergyman (a democrat) who had sex with a subordinate.

His new job? Youth counselor. Is this a great country or what?

Don't forget that the so-called Rev. Jackson was paying his mistress hush and child support money (a 6 figure sum) out funds collected by his so-called "non-profit" organization.

Hmmmm...I am proud of the
monkey boy cause.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:56 PM
link   
Thats what im talkin bout zedd...if theres gonna be a fight bring some good dirt for the festivaties...

Show how f***ed up the dems are...

Show how f***ed up the repubs are

your both right and I love seeing how f***ed up american politics really is..truely..both sides so a few of us that both sides are far to corrupt for any sane person to claim allegiance to either party..

all IMO of coarse

[Edited on 2-3-2004 by McGotti]



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:58 PM
link   
What we should be concentrating on is how Washington is a bought town.

There are filthy people on all fronts.

Case closed.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 10:58 PM
link   
Tax evasion, fraud..these are serious crimes. Let's see what they have to say about the gay/child sex ring in the Bush/Reagan White House?

"This is a news story releated to the franklin coverup. One Call Boy that visited whitehouse was 15 years old."

SEX AND THE CAPITAL

KARLYN BARKER, WASHINGTON POST, JULY 24, 1990: The alleged leader of what authorities have called the largest male prostitution operation in the Washington area surrendered to federal agents yesterday and pleaded not guilty to racketeering charges that have been filed against him and three alleged accomplices. Henry W. Vinson, 29, of Williamson, W.Va., a coal miner's son accused of setting up the homosexual escort service, was arraigned in U.S. District Court here yesterday afternoon after turning himself in to Secret Service agents . . . At a news conference after the arraignment, [U.S. Attorney Jay] Stephens said the investigation into the alleged prostitution ring "is concluded" and that the indictment, which was unsealed yesterday, focused on those who allegedly set up the ring rather than on clients who reportedly patronized it. Asked about earlier reports that some of those clients included high-level officials in the Reagan and Bush administrations, Stephens said the investigation had not revealed "additional conduct which suggests criminal conduct on behalf of other people." . . . The Vinson case provoked additional notice after The Washington Times published reports last summer suggesting that the alleged prostitution ring had been patronized by government officials. The Times named as clients several low-level government employees and Craig J. Spence, a Washington lobbyist and party-giver who, the paper said, took friends and prostitutes on late-night tours of the White House. Spence was found dead in a Boston hotel room last fall, and authorities ruled his death a suicide . . . To date, however, investigators have disclosed no evidence linking any high-level government official to the escort service.

www.indybay.org...

Gay prostitues, racketeering, child sex...um, give me tax evasion any day.

[Edited on 2-3-2004 by Colonel]



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 11:00 PM
link   
I can agree with both of you. I like Republican ideology, not Republican politicians, and even that has its exceptions... Washington is too far gone to get anything real done there.

Honestly, I believe that, in order for true freedom to be maintained, a fairly consistent cycle of revolutions is required. Any political organization will collapse under its own weight if left in place for too long, and it's starting to look like that's going to happen.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 11:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel
Tax evasion, fraud..these are serious crimes. Let's see what they have to say about the gay/child sex ring in the Bush/Reagan White House?

You missed...the democratic sexual fun Colonel. At least on the other side they were of age.

The slimy Democrats like those underage girls it seems.

And the BIG FUN FACT about the Colonel's morally top tier crew...

Another example of sleazy democrats in action.
Jessie Jackson has added former Chicago democratic congressman Mel Reynolds to the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition's payroll.

Reynolds was among the 176 criminals excused in President Clinton's last-minute forgiveness spree. Reynolds received a commutation of his six-and- a-half-year federal sentence for 15 convictions of wire fraud, bank fraud & lies to the Federal Election Commission.

He is more notorious however, for concurrently serving five years for sleeping with an underage campaign volunteer.

This is a first in American politics:
An ex-congressman (a democrat) who had sex with an unaged subordinate won clemency from a president (a democrat) who had sex with a subordinate, then was hired by a clergyman (a democrat) who had sex with a subordinate.

His new job? Youth counselor. Is this a great country or what?

Don't forget that the so-called Rev. Jackson was paying his mistress hush and child support money (a 6 figure sum) out funds collected by his so-called "non-profit" organization.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 11:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xenographer
I can agree with both of you. I like Republican ideology, not Republican politicians, and even that has its exceptions... Washington is too far gone to get anything real done there.

Honestly, I believe that, in order for true freedom to be maintained, a fairly consistent cycle of revolutions is required. Any political organization will collapse under its own weight if left in place for too long, and it's starting to look like that's going to happen.


So, there is no question why I call you all "repugnant," eh?





new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join