Neanderthals - a new species?

Mac,
Hollywood is a waste of time. Dude obviously wants to believe in semi-ancient scripts written maybe 3 thousand years ago rather than look at the actual, hard evidence that dates to thousands, even millions, of years earlier.

The "third eye"crap should have given it away.

Hollywood, your own source for the pic of your "ape" you keep putting up here that you are calling "Cro-Magnon" lists that skull as Homo Sapiens and it is no older than the fictional Atlantis you cling to so desperately.



I think you mean how haplogroup X got to the Americas (there's not very much of it here, actually.)

No Soultrean points have ever been found in the Americas.

Just wanted to clear that up.

Harte

Sorry but the Third Eye Chakra has been scientifically proven and detected with instruments, and it has been published in peer reviewed journals

Here's one article
spectrum.diabetesjournals.org...


Atlantis is real, in fact there are submerged cities and man made structure on the bottoms of most of the oceans





They can call it whatever they want, it's pretty obvious that someone who calls that skull a "human" skull has personal problems and possibly some perversions. Would you mate with that thing? Obvoiusoly not cuz it's not a human.





Just goes to show how many holes there are in the "theories" of modern scientists and how much they have to invent to hold their thoeries together

Chakras and Atlantis are real, Cayce's real, but a skull dating from 7500 BC cannot possibly be human?

See what I mean, Cormac?

BTW, nothing in the abstract you linked about any "third eye."

Harte

Howdy Cormac and Harte

Ah well, you have been busy.......

My only response will be (somewhat muted)


image source: http://www.mydocsonline.com/pub/Cmbattles/facepalm.jpg

How can you call that ape a human with a straight face? Look at the brow lined and the thickness, but beyond that, look at the mouth and teeth alignments, that thing has an animal mouth and it's teeth even protrude in an outwards direction.




Since the article states that most of the major chakra locations were examined, that would imply that the Third Eye Chakra was examined as well. It would be hard to imagine that in their testing they somehow missed that chakra.

reply to post by Harte

---

Hi Harte,

You may be right. I usually tend to keep the Solutrean blade and Haplogroup X items on the back burner as at least, to me, plausable. Point to Hollywood11 is that they have nothing to do with a non-existant island continent and that all Haplogroups are related.

A small group of peoples could have followed the ice sheet from western europe to northern america before the end of the ice age.

cormac

Mac,

Myself, I think it's likely to be true.

But I'd feel better about it if they'd turn up some Soultrean points in Virginia or somewhere like that.

Maybe one day.

Harte

The so called Soultreans go back to, according to you, the areas of France and Spain.

If that's true then they could have come into contact with Atlanteans as the Pyranees mountians are one place where some Atlanteans migrated to.

The bottom line is that this is all just speculation by scientists in order to fill in gaps in their knowledge of History. On the other hand we have historical acounts as well as reliable and verified psychic information. That beats speculation by scientists.



There are 40,000 year old footprints in mexico and the Bering Land bridge theory is pretty much in the toilet, as well as it's not even very likely in the first place.

reply to post by Hollywood11

---

No, as Atlantis and therefore Atlanteans never existed. It was a morality story as told by Plato, nothing more.

When I said:




That's going from western europe WESTWARD along the ice sheet. Has nothing to do with the Bering Strait and would explain the alleged anomolies with Haplogroup X in the north of North America.

cormac

Oh ya, there's tons of theories. Maybe they sailed in little rafts too, but why speculate? Atlantis is tradition and history handed down to us from Egypt through to the Greeks. It fits in much better with all the evidence than any theory.

Actually, there is neither an Egyptian nor a Grecian tradition that involves anything even remotely resembling Atlantis, so once again you post false information to make your case seem stronger.

Harte

Yeah, whatever the Egyptian tradition was that Solon learned of Atlantis from

Plato didn't just think it up or invent it you know

reply to post by Hollywood11

---

Actually, there is NO EVIDENCE of an Egyptian tradition of Atlantis. It is also interesting to note that there is NO MENTION by Solon of any story of Atlantis.




There is NO EVIDENCE that Plato did anything other than invent it.

From your previous posts, all emphasis' are mine:

You said:



Link from www.redicecreations.com...




In other words, your own link shows you‘re wrong.

You said:




From your link: www.meta-religion.com...




So how does that negate the Bering Strait land bridge theory?

You said:




From your link: www.learnersportal.com...




It's clearly NOT finished, merely amended. Science is like that.

I have to ask, do you ever read ALL of the information from the sites you use or just the parts that agree with your opinion?

cormac

Howdy Hollywood

Question for you, have you read the actual Timaeus and Critias documents?

If so explain why no evidence of the empire discussed in Timaeus page 2 has been found?

I see no reason to take Plato as the highest authority or as completely literal when we have other sources that are higher level, like the traditions from Atlantis itself, authentic psychic information, the fact that all religions and civilizations share a common ancestor etc.

Plato has a peice of the puzzle, but only a peice. There is no doubt however, that he couldn't have made it up and it had to have been a real tradtion passed down to him. There's simply no way someone could make all that up and have it work and basically make sense.

[edit on 15-5-2008 by Hollywood11]

ah, er, okay, backing slowly out the door.