I´ve always placed interest in people claiming to be "channeling" extraterrestrials and extra-dimensionals because it would seem to be a convinient
mode of communication if non-interference laws, human non-readiness or governmental cover-ups do not allow for a direct landing of their
spacecraft.
Definition
Channeling is the process by which someone (the channeler) goes into an altered state (trance or higher vibration) through which an entity on another
plane or outside of the earths sphere can communicate with the earthlings. Some Channelers describe this as "I raise my own frequency, the alien
lowers his own frequency so we meet in the middle". Others say they receive telepathic pulses and emotion-packages which they translate into their
language and concepts. Yet others claim that their bodies are temporarily occupied by other entities.
Phenomena Observed
Ive visited a few "channelings" or transmissions-by-extraterrestrials myself.
When those I assume to be genuine channellers alter their state this is often accompanied by altered breathing, inadverdent twitching of the body and
muscles, and a change of voice, tone, accent and vocabulary.
Some of these changes are so extreme that the best actor in the world couldnt fake
them.
Con Artists vs. Genuine Messengers
In looking into various channelings and channellers over the last decade Ive noticed extreme variations in
quality and
integrity of the
channellers, the channelled messages and the behaviour of the beings supposedly being channelled.
This is just one example of ET-Channeling that I deem to be a complete HOAX:
Ashtar Command
This is just one example of ET-Channeling that I deem to be completely GENUINE:
Bashar
Both claim to be channeling extraterrestrials, but the results are radically different.
There are hundreds of other links I could place, but this should be enough to give an example of Discernment between
flimsy and
possibly
substantial.
Ive found more scam-artists than honest people in the field, unfortunately. Here are some typical observations of comparison:
1. The channeller himself. Con-Artists dont even believe in extraterrestrials or in helping anyone. When you meet them you often get the impression of
a cynic trying to squeeze money out of his business. When you meet apparently genuine channellers you get the impression of down-to-earth people who
are still willing to question if their own offerings are even genuine!
2. The message itself: The messages of Con-Artists seem to be vague ("We come in peace! Dont pollute your planet!") pretentious ("You need to be
saved by us") and humorless or unaccepting of critisism (cultish). The message of genuine channellers has often turned out to be
useful,
practical,
accurate in some predictions, and generally humorous and intelligent.
Most of these things end up to be Q&A-Sessions with an audience asking questions and and ETs answering. Apart from obvious scam-artists there also
seems to be the inability of some channellers to let information in
unfiltered. This seems to distort some of the messages given. An example
for someone who I suspect to be genuine but maybe not a "clean filterless channel":
Lyssa Royal
These are some of my observations and the suggestion that
Contact neednt only occur through physical, nuts-and-bolts spacecraft but can also
take on more metaphysical means.
In any case, it can be good to get away from the black-white thinking of "Channelling - Truth or Hoax?" and recognize that the truth may lie
somewhere in the middle.
Looking forward to what I learn from others who have read and experienced channelers and contactees.
