reply to post by 12.21.12
Ok, I'm coming to the defense to 12.21.12
Why, for the simple fact that he ALREADY presented, IMO, hard core evidence from a professional source and everyone that is debunking it doesn't seem
to stick with the facts.
If you going to try prove something is true, disprove it first. How? Easy, stick with the scientific evidence and physics, both if properly applied,
will provide the evidence needed to make a conclusion.
I haven't been able to check out the company name of the person at the video editing company
Now to me, this person sounds credible. Has anyone on here been able to locate this person and company?? Has anyone trying to debunk this even tried
to reach this person ??
If not, lets start there.
Next, we should have 2 another independent sources to review the footage as well to get a good consensus and conclusion; 12.21.12, I'm not saying
you're invalid but someone other than those that have a stake in this post should review the evidence, if that makes sense.
~Also, as for the Sci-Fi logo, hmmmm.. yeaaaa.. they both kinda look like the same .. but my only problem with this is .. they could have said..
'wow.. that kinda looks like the Sci-Fi channel logo.. (reaching) See what i"m saying.. you can spin that TOTALLY in that direction..
conclusion .. the jury is still out on this one.. we need more input and questioning instead of trying to slam someone on here for having a open
mind.. and bringing more evidence that most the posts I've read so far.. including mine !
[edit on 04/02/2008 by Komodo]