It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MITCHEL
reply to post by Maban
You are left with a choice: either let the collapse happen under the weight of corruption, or take proactive action to cause a controlled collapse. Either option is unwieldy, but spending all your precious time and resources on damage control means the world controls you instead of you controlling the world and taking it in a direction toward the peace and happiness you refer to.
Your ‘dark brothers’ consider peace and happiness undesirable because it is stagnant. This begs the question: does dysfunction, dependence and suffering progress toward something which is genuinely redeemable? If it is redeemable, is it only redeemable for the purpose of evil? Or, is it all pointless madness and dysfunctional stagnation? I do not see a problem with functional stagnation. I only see a problem with dysfunctional stagnation. Constant warfare is dysfunctional stagnation.
Originally posted by BrokenVisage
However, how you answered this important question concerns and agitates me, especially if you're so willing to disclose other aspects of this cult.
Are you afraid of reprisals? Does the church hold more power and know more about our origin then we are led to believe? Is the claim that they are associated with visiting aliens factual?
Originally posted by Merle8
Is the goal of your shard to essentially get people to live in a crappy agrarian society (no matter how well organized it would be, it would still suck to live in) without technology? Is it going to be done by using up all the resources and causing wars until living off the land is the only means of survival?
Originally posted by Maban
reply to post by cornixman
Just a quick question for you, what are your impressions of Leo Zagami? Is he a real Illuminati whistle blower or a fraud?
He certainly holds many "true" facts. Although, his lack of "distinction" between Shards and Remnants leads me to the conclusion that he is either a Remnant propagandist or someone shouting to the world incomplete facts and some sophistry. Either way I'd say take his cries of "wolf" with a grain of salt as any. He may be, he may be not; unfortunately there is no "black or white" clear cut definition. There are many "individuals" who try to play both sides of the fence (secretly) so it is always hard to say. My first inkling is he managed to collect enough facts to make a good argument but is missing the critical elements to totally convince me. I would say if he where unmistakably (to us) a proponent of a Remnant, action would have already been taken.
Originally posted by Spaxz
By the way what movie are you refering to with that Avatar? I would be interested to watch it.
Originally posted by Sir Francis Bacon
Maybe necessity begs that I do ask you one quick question: Do you know how long, roughly, will you be here with us online?
Originally posted by Maban
3) What does the pope and the many religions have to do with this?
A:This subject i am very... cautious about. Lets simply say some are justified and hold much truth. While others are simply sophistry. In the end people will see truth, and much will change. The generalizations here are intended and deliberate; for good reasons i will not entertain. These matters are in regards to our origins,of which i cannot discuss regrettably.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
What do the following symbols mean to you:
1. Three concentric circles
2. The number 5
3. A rose violet-blue