 |
|
Topic started on 3-5-2008 @ 03:46 PM by wang_ke
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2008 @ 03:49 PM by wang_ke
|
Sorry for the inconvenience... but not sure how to work image shack yet. Here's that same image with my questions about it. thanks.
Edit: the image shack link is working now.
[edit on 3-5-2008 by wang_ke]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2008 @ 03:57 PM by h3akalee
|
Where was this picture taken and by whom may i ask you ?
Take care.
Regards
Lee
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2008 @ 03:59 PM by internos
|
reply to post by wang_ke
HI wang_ke:
if the informations available are just these ones, i'm not surprised that it's an unsolved case
Do you know something more about this odd Photograph?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2008 @ 04:23 PM by wang_ke
|
I watched a video earlier today that was in one of the posts on this board and took a screenshot of one of the "aliens" in that documentary. Need to
look for the link to that video -- it's the one by the current head of Disney corporation (oh.. the past head of Disney.. sorry)-- something about it
being from someone named a gardener of someone but I'm Palasheea btw. lol.. Using an old acct. here that I started up when I first joined up here
where I could not remember my password for Palasheea.
Let me look for that vid. now and will post a link to it here.
-------------------------------------
Here's the link to that video:
video.google.com...
Only using this moniker for this forum temporarily because my other browser is too saturated with virus scanners and what have you.. .. need to find
out which ones to uninstall because it's slowing down that browser preventing me from loading anything before things "time out" -- so using this
browser and moniker for now.
Correction: the link above is the second part of that documentary.. I got the screenshot of that "alien" from Part 1:
video.google.com...
It's in the first 1/3 section of this vid after the Men in Black part.
[edit on 3-5-2008 by wang_ke]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2008 @ 05:34 PM by wang_ke
|
That "alien" photo comes in at around 21.51:1.20 in PART 1 of that documentary I gave a link to in my previous post.
Just watched that part over again and this is the part where they are showing that photo.
Edit: Actually the screenshot I got of that "alien" was a split second before the mark that I quoted above because at that time they were then
ZOOMING in on that "being" in that photograph.
[edit on 3-5-2008 by wang_ke]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 09:41 AM by wang_ke
|
The screenshot of that "alien" (see image #1 in OP) is one of the photographs received by Bob Oechsler (and others) from a mysterious source calling
himself "Guardian. Also read over everything I could find on these events having to do with that alleged UFO landing in Carp, Ottawa, Canada and
it's clear that Bob Oechsler angered those Canadian MUFON investigators whom he teamed up with to investigate this event because he went behind their
back and negotiated a business deal with that show "Unsolved Mysteries" to go on it and talk about this case.
Nevertheless, since the Canadian investigators of this case were greedy fame seekers too, even though they were thoroughly pissed off at Bob Oechsler
about what he did, those same Canadian investigators still agreed to be interviewed on that show about this case too where they said, without
hesitation, that they believed this event and those witnesses who came forward to talk about those sightings related to that landing, INCLUDING THE
PHOTO'S AND VIDEO'S -- to be one of the most momentous UFO events to occur in the history of Canada -- or something to that effect; and you can see
them doing that in wonderful living color in Part 2 of that documentary.
But then, soon after that, those Canadian investigators found out that Bob Oechsler also negotiated another more financially lucrative long
term deal with the producers of that show having to do with this case and this is when those investigators finally turned on Bob Oechsler BIG TIME
where not only did they attempt to do everything humanly possible to diminish Oechsler's credibility via the internet, they even went so far as to
retract everything they said on that show about that UFO event -- even going so far as calling it a very elaborate hoax!
Lol, so what else is new? It's not like we haven't see this same kind of scenario over and over and over again among researchers and writers in this
field and Bob Oechsler, like so many others too, finally just dropped out of the scene all together because by then those Canadian MUFON
investigators had convinced everyone out there that he was nothing more than a greedy con man. Yet, whatever the case may be, it's ABUNDANTLY clear
that those Canadian MUFON investigators were on a warpath of vengeance in regard to Oechsler and anything on the net that they've written about this
Ottawa UFO event and Oechsler's involvement in it is suspect because of this -- anyone with half a brain can see that -- jeesh! -- they make it
sound like Oechsler belongs on death row!
I'm not done yet with this and will add more later...
[edit on 4-5-2008 by wang_ke]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 06:04 PM by wang_ke
|
Whatever the case may be about this story, one thing for sure, that photograph of an alleged alien was chock full of "paranormal" anomalous
"faces" as can be seen in the image below. In this version, I got the results below after I inversed that photo.
The results are intriguing because it seems to have a Darwinistic theme to it starting off with an image of what looks like a monkey to an image of
what looks like the face of a Neanderthal and on up to another part of a face that has a pharaoh-like eyes (but with only one eye showing) which I
labeled the "eye of Horus".
So what's the message here and what about those letters and numbers that are superimposed on the "aliens" head? I have a few thoughts on all of
this and will share later...
[edit on 4-5-2008 by wang_ke]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 06:18 PM by free_spirit
|
With all due respect I checked the image of the alien you posted where
an alleged second face with simbols appeared and I found it has been
doctored or manipulated. The original photo has been analyzed many
times and never showed these second face and numbers therefore it's
clear they were added or edited in a composition. Could they be just
artifacts ? I doubt it. It's clear the image is been manipulated.
This is the same photograph enhanced with filters and there's nothing
around just the usual artifacts due to the brightness exposé. I don't
know about that Dodge program you said you used but Photoshop
shows a different story. Check the photo enhanced.
image source: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i317/free_spirit_2006/GuardianAlienPhotoenhanced.jpg
Also the links to the video don't correspond to the description you are
giving neither the times. The correct link is the one from the Unsolved
Mysteries show posted in Google video that starts with the Men in Black
and follows with the complete Guardian ufo story showing that alien photo
at the time you posted. This is the correct link.
video.google.com...
By the way this is another alleged alien photo submitted by Guardian,
don't you think it's suspicious?
image source: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i317/free_spirit_2006/GuardianAlienPhoto1992.jpg
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 06:29 PM by wang_ke
|
Wow! Thanks free spirit for posting that other photo. I read somewhere that there were more than one photo's of "aliens" that were sent out to
researchers by "Guardian" but in that documentary, they only showed one of them.
As for the details of this story, I don't know who to believe but just out of curiosity I'm just doing my own analysis on those alien photos
including screenshots of the UFO and I'm sharing my results here.
But you said that the "original" photo of the alien that's in the photo that I analyzed and posted here in this thread did not have numbers on them
and that that image has been tampered with. Could you please post a link or two to confirm that information for us? Or post the original photo if
you have it? I tried searching for it on the net but nothing turned up. All I had was that photo that was shown in that video.
And thanks for posting the correct link to that documentary.. I posted the link to Part 1 twice in error. Not intentionally of course.
[edit on 4-5-2008 by wang_ke]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 06:32 PM by sherpa
|
Lol, I admire your imagination and choice of avatar in this particular persona, I think I prefer it to your usual identity it brightens my day
I am not sure I can be constuctive on this one with so little detail the only thing I can say is the hand reminds me of the hand on this supposed
alien.
www.ufocasebook.com...
And as for the other shapes you have exposed, well it is just weird.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 06:36 PM by wang_ke
|
Lol, glad you like my new "persona"!
Once had a cat named Wang-ke, that's the origin of that name.
And you are right about the hands of that "alien" you are showing in your post being like the one in the Carp alien photo... good observation!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 06:47 PM by wang_ke
|
Also, free spirit, can you give us a link to where you got that photo?
I would have to view that webpage and find out who wrote it before I could determine if it's really one of those photo's of "aliens" sent out to
researchers by Guardian.
thanks
[edit on 4-5-2008 by wang_ke]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 06:49 PM by internos
|
reply to post by wang_ke
So wang_ke = Palasheea ?
LMAO!   
Pala, there must be some way to recover your pass!
I also prefer your previous avatar: but funny cat though
Good work free_spirit as usual
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 06:53 PM by wang_ke
|
Will just keep switching back and forth between persona's internos to confuse the heck out of everybody here!
What fun!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 07:11 PM by wang_ke
|
 
My apologies.. double post.
[edit on 4-5-2008 by wang_ke]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 07:48 PM by Palasheea
|

[
Originally posted by free_spirit
With all due respect I checked the image of the alien you posted where
an alleged second face with simbols appeared and I found it has been
doctored or manipulated. The original photo has been analyzed many
times and never showed these second face and numbers therefore it's
clear they were added or edited in a composition. Could they be just
artifacts ? I doubt it. It's clear the image is been manipulated.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free spirit, since all of the investigators were working with the producers of that show .. it was they who allowed those video's and
photo's, including one of the photo's with an alien in it that was sent to them by Guardian, to show them in that documentary. I assume that they
showed the ORIGINAL photo's and video's that they got directly from Guardian... not second hand ones found on the net. lol
Anyway, I then took frameshots of that photograph that's showing in that video of that photograph with that alien in it.
Those letters and numbers ARE showing up in that photograph IN THE VIDEO and you can see that when you click on pause when viewing that section
of that video where they are showing that photograph -- those numbers and letters are there.
[edit on 4-5-2008 by Palasheea]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 08:50 PM by debris765nju
|
There's a whole bunch of aliens there, look close, they are
in 3D
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 09:11 PM by debris765nju
|
The unseen people compressing themselves together to form a visual
object for focusing human attention where they want it to be. Have you ever seen a Fakir from India charming a cobra? That is what these beings are
doing to you.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-5-2008 @ 09:52 PM by debris765nju
|
This is the Caponi photo posted above but for the moment i want you to look
at the area around the creature. All Aliens that have been featured in a photograph has this same "support group" around it. Look at their size,
shape, color and appearance in the pictures i posted. I quit reading the so-called experts decades ago because they are not even close to the truth.
Nobody wants to acknowledge what is happening around and too us. There is one alien species on the planet, they are made "visible" so you can see
how we really exist. I live with these people, look at my avatar. That Caponi can and did break down in those component pieces (people) that make up
the support group.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |