Originally posted by where
Blackwater is not a "private army". They operate by different rules of engagement than traditional military. They're hardly allowed to shoot back
when they're shot at, and hey, almost just like our military.
Seriously though. Security forces like Blackwater operate under different rules of engagement and cannot initiate firefights. If for-hire services had
the same engagement rules as traditional military, they would be considered mercenaries. Perhaps that's why a few of them were murdered in Fallujah,
and once they got tired of being murdered, they started firing back, and yet, once they do, they get kicked out of Iraq. It's a sticky situation for
them.
And of course it's run by a right-wing guy. Do you really think any liberal would ever run a gun store?
[edit on 23-7-2008 by where]
Sure Blackwater operates under a different set of rule of engagement, but they operate totally outside of U.S. Constitutional control, because they
are not held accountable according to the same regulations as the Army, Marines, or even the National Guard for that matter.
They operate on a strictly per job and per rate basis, something our own military do not get paid for, and the regular Army should not get paid that
way either, but in the same sense the Army, Marines, and other militaries should be getting paid more money, but they are not.
The individual soldier is getting crapped on because they get paid so little.
Of course a liberla would never run a gun store, but then again, I'm no liberal either. I am swinging the middle there, not right-wing, not
left-wing, but understanding both sides of the coin.
[edit on 23-7-2008 by SpartanKingLeonidas]