While his basic reasoning is right, some of what Bush says is simply not quite true.
He is not BLAMING India but rather explaining one of the causes of food price rise. The article is however paranoid piece by somebody who has a really
small ego.
Another point is that as India prospers ( I wont believe Merkel's garbage about eating two meals, they have always been eating plenty there! Probably
she should ask germans to drink less beer and eat more real food! ) they are going to get better techniques at producing more food for themselves.
They are already one of the largest producers of rice, sugar, etc as a large part of their population is still engaged in agriculture. Add to this
they have the most number of vegetarians amongst them and this would make their needs less resource intensive than Americans or Europeans who eat more
meat. Compared to the amount of food the US imports to the amount of food India imports America, Europe etc are more to blame for having such large
consumption beyond their requirements that has led to this situation.


Blatantly biased. They started this anti-biofuel bulldookie a year or so ago. When you villify the WHOLE biofuel industry for the perception
that food is going to biofuel instead of peoples mouths you do injustice to people that are working on fuels to replace or improve our existing
relationship with middle east oil. 
like the "mental giant" soviets did. 
