Crazy Grid of Earthquakes!! What??!!

If Lake Tahoe is putting out sulfur, that is a bad sign. Does anyone know if its water level has dropped and if any nearby wells or springs dried up?

If anyone can find out that would be great. Thousands of people's lives could be at stake. If we can confirm that there are signs of an immanent event, we need to get the word out to people as quickly as possible so they can get out of there.

This sulfur thing has got me really worried.

When you think about things like plate tectonics and how earthquakes really work, it makes sense that releaving tension in one area by creating a man-made earthquake would increase tension on other areas which could, then, over time build and cause a future massive earthquake. If this is really man-made there are probably very few people who actually would know when or where this large earthquake would take place. You wouldn't think a small earthquake in one location and releaving would seem like much but that energy is being transfered elsewhere am I wrong?

-ChriS

That it's a rough grid. As I said?



Not at all. That was my point that they aren;t a grid and that it would make no sense for them to be so in the 'conspiracies' so far talked about.



Because they report the same locations and people have said so?



You really misunderstood my post. 'Idiot' in that their behaviour,if this was to do with them, is utterly ridiculous...

Well i checked the World Emergency and Disaster Service and they don't seem to have any earthquake data for the last 12 hours.

Either no quakes have happened, or the data has been removed.

RSOE Havaria EaDS

Has anyone looked at this:
hisz.rsoe.hu...

Its a disaster and emergency info service.

If you notice the Ring of Fire is lit up with eruptions, even globally there seems to be an abnormal amount of eruptions. There's around 25 active eruptions going on around the Ring of Fire alone.

The eerie thing is the lack of activity in the western US. No St. Helens, nothing.

reply to post by MikeboydUS

---

Haha i beat you to it by a fraction of a second

Just to let you know though, that number of eruptions IS NOT strange. That is around average.

The strange part is the lack of earthquake data.

reply to post by fooffstarr

---

I'm installin NASA world wind so I can check on quake activity. Hopefully they havn't removed their data. I might get paranoid if that happens.

maybe they are destroying those large underground cities.. that Dr. Greer.. and some others have been talking about.. must take hundreds of thousands of people to keep those places going.. destroying all the evidence before anyone finds out.. seems to be the only way out.. yeah. uh huh.. for sure..

The data on the alert website you gave seems very incomplete in some cases. Like the biological hazard it shows in the U.S. for boulder country colorado at 03/05/2008 - 03:46:20. No data, no data, cause unknown? Then why did they post it if it is useless information? Without knowing what is actually going on how would anyone be able to do anything anyway?

-ChriS



[edit on 3-5-2008 by BlasteR]

I've been watching local news lately-- not something I normally do-- but I haven't heard anything about a sulpher smell at Lake Tahoe. Still, you may want to check the area newspapers online.

I just looked at the Nevada Seismological Laboratory...They don't seem to be too concerned about what's happening:



Nevada Seismological Laboratory

I don't notice any grid like pattern on the maps there, it looks pretty natural to me.

I may be wrong, but wasn't some sort of operation supposed to start on May 1st? This couldn't have anything to do with that, could it?

I did not read every post in this thread. From looking at the maps as much as I did, it looked like most of the quakes were very low magnitude, around the one - two range or so. They were not even large enough to be listed on emergency or disaster web page. Small earth quakes happen like this all the time and can not be felt. I might suspect that a patter like this could be plotted for most earth quake prone regions.

Helens is erupting, it's just a quiet dome building event and not an explosive event like the one in 80-83.

Tela

reply to post by SonicInfinity

---

May 1st - 5th was meant to be a series of terror drills all over the US... i don't see how earthquakes could be related unless it is something to do with the article posted earlier in this topic about terrorists staging 'geological attacks' by creating earthquakes.

I don't see it being likely though. Takes more than such a loose connection to make me worry.

I still think it is just a completely natural and unlinked set of earthquakes.

There is zero objectivity in this thread.

Who put those dots on the satellite photo? Can we get a confirmation that they guy did not put bogus dots on a photo?

I want to know how I can see the dots in from a reliable source. I have not been able to see that grid anywhere in the links provided here for real sources.

Anyone can paint dots in grids!

look run in horror: below is a map of Pennsylvania with mysterious grids of earthquakes

___________________________________
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
___________________________________

People, please, do not make me laugh at you again!

Instead of being skeptical, why don't remain indifferent? What's going to happen if he DOES provide solid, indisputable proof that those dots are real? You would be made to look like quite the fool.

If it is terrorist or another country using EMP or some type of device, then they got it around 2002....

6.0 or larger earthquakes by year for Entire World
1960 3
1962 3
1963 2
1964 4
1965 13
1966 6
1967 3
1968 6
1969 4
1970 5
1971 4
1972 6
1973 1
1974 5
1975 6
1976 5
1977 2
1978 2
1979 2
1980 5
1981 3
1982 1
1983 4
1984 1
1985 4
1986 3
1987 4
1988 4
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 5
1993 3
1994 3
1995 4
1996 1
1997 5
1998 8
1999 12
2000 6
2001 7
2002 22
2003 38
2004 33
2005 34
2006 24
2007 46
2008 15 (We are exactly 1/3 thru the year so at this rate) ?45?

Original Post..
1960-2001=4.2 and 2002-2008=34.5 (Average number of 6.0 magnitude or greater earthquakes per year)

Note.. these are 6.o or larger quakes not small quakes, it has been suggested that technology for earthquake detection abilities have increased over the last few years and this would justify the higher numbers, IMO that would not apply to these numbers as these are large quakes and technology from 1995 would allow us to see these.. Good Cover up story though..
[edit on 3-5-2008 by ats1629]

[edit on 3-5-2008 by ats1629]

reply to post by ats1629

---

That is a very interesting piece of information you provided.

Thanks.

I wonder why there have been so many larger magnitude earthquakes within the last decade.
Is it possible that they didn`t have the availability to collect all the data needed to provide such information? I`m wondering if the numbers recorded are higher simply because there is more means to record this data in recent years.
Anyone know for sure?

reply to post by ats1629

---

You just answered my question with your edit before I posted.

Thanks for reading my mind.