It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Crazy Grid of Earthquakes!! What??!!

page: 4
55
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 3 2008 @ 04:52 PM
link   
If Lake Tahoe is putting out sulfur, that is a bad sign. Does anyone know if its water level has dropped and if any nearby wells or springs dried up?

If anyone can find out that would be great. Thousands of people's lives could be at stake. If we can confirm that there are signs of an immanent event, we need to get the word out to people as quickly as possible so they can get out of there.

This sulfur thing has got me really worried.




posted on May, 3 2008 @ 05:17 PM
link   
When you think about things like plate tectonics and how earthquakes really work, it makes sense that releaving tension in one area by creating a man-made earthquake would increase tension on other areas which could, then, over time build and cause a future massive earthquake. If this is really man-made there are probably very few people who actually would know when or where this large earthquake would take place. You wouldn't think a small earthquake in one location and releaving would seem like much but that energy is being transfered elsewhere am I wrong?

-ChriS



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 05:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by ViewFromTheStars

What about Macrotus' last post can you even agree with? It was a thoughtless knee jerk reactive post. (No insult intended, just calling it like I see it)


That it's a rough grid. As I said?


Originally posted by ViewFromTheStars

So you admit these 'earthquakes' are in "an actual obvious grid pattern".?


Not at all. That was my point that they aren;t a grid and that it would make no sense for them to be so in the 'conspiracies' so far talked about.


Originally posted by ViewFromTheStars

How do you know that other numerous earthquake monitoring groups are not picking up on this?


Because they report the same locations and people have said so?


Originally posted by ViewFromTheStars

Idiot secret agency? heheh.. Have you ever really researched the CIA? You know, the one that does MUCH evil for a "greater" good? Now THAT is an idiot secret agency if I ever heard of one. (One with more power than it deserves)


You really misunderstood my post. 'Idiot' in that their behaviour,if this was to do with them, is utterly ridiculous...



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 05:41 PM
link   
Well i checked the World Emergency and Disaster Service and they don't seem to have any earthquake data for the last 12 hours.

Either no quakes have happened, or the data has been removed.

RSOE Havaria EaDS



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 05:42 PM
link   
Has anyone looked at this:
hisz.rsoe.hu...

Its a disaster and emergency info service.

If you notice the Ring of Fire is lit up with eruptions, even globally there seems to be an abnormal amount of eruptions. There's around 25 active eruptions going on around the Ring of Fire alone.

The eerie thing is the lack of activity in the western US. No St. Helens, nothing.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 05:45 PM
link   
reply to post by MikeboydUS
 


Haha i beat you to it by a fraction of a second


Just to let you know though, that number of eruptions IS NOT strange. That is around average.

The strange part is the lack of earthquake data.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 05:47 PM
link   
reply to post by fooffstarr
 



I'm installin NASA world wind so I can check on quake activity. Hopefully they havn't removed their data. I might get paranoid if that happens.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 05:56 PM
link   
maybe they are destroying those large underground cities.. that Dr. Greer.. and some others have been talking about.. must take hundreds of thousands of people to keep those places going.. destroying all the evidence before anyone finds out.. seems to be the only way out.. yeah. uh huh.. for sure..



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 05:59 PM
link   
The data on the alert website you gave seems very incomplete in some cases. Like the biological hazard it shows in the U.S. for boulder country colorado at 03/05/2008 - 03:46:20. No data, no data, cause unknown? Then why did they post it if it is useless information? Without knowing what is actually going on how would anyone be able to do anything anyway?

-ChriS



[edit on 3-5-2008 by BlasteR]



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 06:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by MikeboydUS
If Lake Tahoe is putting out sulfur, that is a bad sign. Does anyone know if its water level has dropped and if any nearby wells or springs dried up?

If anyone can find out that would be great. Thousands of people's lives could be at stake. If we can confirm that there are signs of an immanent event, we need to get the word out to people as quickly as possible so they can get out of there.

This sulfur thing has got me really worried.


I've been watching local news lately-- not something I normally do-- but I haven't heard anything about a sulpher smell at Lake Tahoe. Still, you may want to check the area newspapers online.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 06:26 PM
link   
I just looked at the Nevada Seismological Laboratory...They don't seem to be too concerned about what's happening:


*The location and mechanisms of these earthquakes all indicate that they are not related to volcanic activity

*This ongoing earthquake swarm is a timely reminder that western Nevada has a significant earthquake hazard.


Nevada Seismological Laboratory

I don't notice any grid like pattern on the maps there, it looks pretty natural to me.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 07:02 PM
link   
I may be wrong, but wasn't some sort of operation supposed to start on May 1st? This couldn't have anything to do with that, could it?



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 07:57 PM
link   
I did not read every post in this thread. From looking at the maps as much as I did, it looked like most of the quakes were very low magnitude, around the one - two range or so. They were not even large enough to be listed on emergency or disaster web page. Small earth quakes happen like this all the time and can not be felt. I might suspect that a patter like this could be plotted for most earth quake prone regions.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 07:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by MikeboydUS


The eerie thing is the lack of activity in the western US. No St. Helens, nothing.


Helens is erupting, it's just a quiet dome building event and not an explosive event like the one in 80-83.

Tela



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 07:58 PM
link   
reply to post by SonicInfinity
 


May 1st - 5th was meant to be a series of terror drills all over the US... i don't see how earthquakes could be related unless it is something to do with the article posted earlier in this topic about terrorists staging 'geological attacks' by creating earthquakes.

I don't see it being likely though. Takes more than such a loose connection to make me worry.

I still think it is just a completely natural and unlinked set of earthquakes.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 08:08 PM
link   
There is zero objectivity in this thread.

Who put those dots on the satellite photo? Can we get a confirmation that they guy did not put bogus dots on a photo?

I want to know how I can see the dots in from a reliable source. I have not been able to see that grid anywhere in the links provided here for real sources.

Anyone can paint dots in grids!

look run in horror: below is a map of Pennsylvania with mysterious grids of earthquakes

___________________________________
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
___________________________________

People, please, do not make me laugh at you again!



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 08:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cyberbian
There is zero objectivity in this thread.

Who put those dots on the satellite photo? Can we get a confirmation that they guy did not put bogus dots on a photo?

I want to know how I can see the dots in from a reliable source. I have not been able to see that grid anywhere in the links provided here for real sources.

Anyone can paint dots in grids!

look run in horror: below is a map of Pennsylvania with mysterious grids of earthquakes

___________________________________
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
| . . . . . |
___________________________________

People, please, do not make me laugh at you again!


Instead of being skeptical, why don't remain indifferent? What's going to happen if he DOES provide solid, indisputable proof that those dots are real? You would be made to look like quite the fool.



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 08:26 PM
link   
If it is terrorist or another country using EMP or some type of device, then they got it around 2002....

6.0 or larger earthquakes by year for Entire World
1960 3
1962 3
1963 2
1964 4
1965 13
1966 6
1967 3
1968 6
1969 4
1970 5
1971 4
1972 6
1973 1
1974 5
1975 6
1976 5
1977 2
1978 2
1979 2
1980 5
1981 3
1982 1
1983 4
1984 1
1985 4
1986 3
1987 4
1988 4
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 5
1993 3
1994 3
1995 4
1996 1
1997 5
1998 8
1999 12
2000 6
2001 7
2002 22
2003 38
2004 33
2005 34
2006 24
2007 46
2008 15 (We are exactly 1/3 thru the year so at this rate) ?45?

Original Post..
1960-2001=4.2 and 2002-2008=34.5 (Average number of 6.0 magnitude or greater earthquakes per year)

Note.. these are 6.o or larger quakes not small quakes, it has been suggested that technology for earthquake detection abilities have increased over the last few years and this would justify the higher numbers, IMO that would not apply to these numbers as these are large quakes and technology from 1995 would allow us to see these.. Good Cover up story though..
[edit on 3-5-2008 by ats1629]

[edit on 3-5-2008 by ats1629]



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 08:43 PM
link   
reply to post by ats1629
 


That is a very interesting piece of information you provided.

Thanks.

I wonder why there have been so many larger magnitude earthquakes within the last decade.
Is it possible that they didn`t have the availability to collect all the data needed to provide such information? I`m wondering if the numbers recorded are higher simply because there is more means to record this data in recent years.
Anyone know for sure?



posted on May, 3 2008 @ 08:45 PM
link   
reply to post by ats1629
 


You just answered my question with your edit before I posted.

Thanks for reading my mind.



new topics

top topics



 
55
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join