Express pic. An alienmade face or a natural formation?

page: 1
0

log in

join

posted on Feb, 27 2004 @ 01:49 PM
link   
I think it is a natural formation, but at the same time I have some doubts.





These pics are taken from this overhead view from Mars Express.
The "Face" is in the lower left side of the image.
www.esa.int...




posted on Feb, 27 2004 @ 01:58 PM
link   
sorry, but I don't see anything here?



posted on Feb, 27 2004 @ 02:01 PM
link   
Lemmie see. It looks like a guy playing a Banjo. It also looks like the skull of a bird. Aren't these "land formations" really a geographical ink blot test?...



posted on Feb, 27 2004 @ 06:31 PM
link   
ahh i saw it right off the bat. two eyes mouth and nose kinda looks sad to me



posted on Feb, 27 2004 @ 06:41 PM
link   
yeah, i don't think there's anything there.



posted on Feb, 27 2004 @ 06:43 PM
link   
maybe its an ANCIENT monument built by the martians a milliong years ago



posted on Feb, 27 2004 @ 07:05 PM
link   
I saw this earlier, saw nothing then left, and decided to come back in the early hours in the morning and see if my blurred vision from being up for 20 hrs would allow me to see anything...but alas no...wtf can u see, surely its just a rock formation! Are u drunk?

By the way....if this was really an ancient or even current landmark from a race of aliens, do u really think that the public would have access to the pictures?...um doubt it, but maybe thats me just being rational, sry



posted on Feb, 27 2004 @ 07:26 PM
link   
I'll post another pic tomorrow.

Stay tuned.



posted on Feb, 28 2004 @ 12:06 PM
link   
OK, OK. My first post was not so clear. "Lower left" was referred to the full ESA pic in the link not the image you can see here.
But now look...



this is the "Face" edited by me



this is a part of the original Express pic in the link of the first post.

Alienmade or natural it looks like a face to me.



posted on Feb, 28 2004 @ 02:19 PM
link   
Damn, it really does look like a face now that you isolated it.



posted on Mar, 2 2004 @ 11:14 PM
link   
What I think is funny. We've seen and heard about this supposed "face" on mars. Well we've sent 2 rovers that have cost what 800 million a pop? They were not sent anywhere near that. In fact since it first appeared that it was a almost humanoid face NASA quickly said it was a lighting abnormality that cause this "mountain" to have the features of a face. My personal opinion is that it is some kind of operating base which NASA and the government already know is habited by who knows what but diverts the public attention to the rocks that were now discovered to have been under water.
Just my 2 cents.



posted on Mar, 3 2004 @ 01:44 PM
link   
There is no face. Just our mind assimilating.



posted on Mar, 3 2004 @ 08:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Omega Pickle
There is no face. Just our mind assimilating.


I think I have to agree with the Pickle here. I think we all "want" to see something there to help us in "proving" life outside our planet. But ultimatly I think it is just something naturally occuring... odd but natural.



posted on Mar, 3 2004 @ 11:15 PM
link   
a face, i definately see a face...



posted on Mar, 4 2004 @ 12:28 AM
link   
looks a little like a face but id have to say its not convincing to me that its not a natural formation





new topics
top topics
 
0

log in

join