It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Originally posted by biggie smalls
reply to post by Blaine91555
We did invade Iraq, will you refute this as well?
Yes, we invaded Iraq when we liberated the country Saddam invaded. We had to, to drive him out. Then we stopped the fighting when a peace treaty was agreed to by Saddam. He then violated it over and over and over again until we went back in this time. There is no new war. That was an invention of the Democratic Party and liars in the media.
The only thing I might be wrong about is the number of U.N. Mandates Saddam violated. It's interesting to me how people condemn the Media and the Political Parties until their propaganda happens to serve their needs.
Originally posted by Sublime620
reply to post by _Del_
Do you think a 9/11 site should remain up if it contains lies? I sure don't.
There is a difference between a dissenting view and a lie.
For instance, any 9/11 site that still says that there were no planes, and no one died that day.
That is a lie that can be proven as such, do you not agree?
More importantly, those aren't MSM sites, are they? Most of those are privately owned, not public domains.
They would not fall under supervision.
reply to post by Blaine91555
You folks need to learn the history of that event. You have egg on your faces right now. Is it possible you are all too young to know the history of the events that led up to this?
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by thefreepatriot
Hey, if you have a link for that, I would much appreciate it.
[edit on 5/5/0808 by jackinthebox]
Your blog is everybit as narrow minded and full of lies as you accuse Fox news of being. McCaine gives thumbs up to torture--what a joke. If your recording of Murdock et. al is true, then why is it that only blogs that are not liable for false reporting the only people who say that they have these secret recordings.
Anonymous RangeRider said...
The above comment by Anonymous clearly substantiates this report is far as I'm concerned. Murdoch should have added that not only are Fox viewers "dumb as doorknobs" but they have no sense of humor and can't recognize satire even when it hits them in the face.
Originally posted by centurion1211
reply to post by weedwhacker
Personally I still see a lot of parallels - and it isn't pretty. Barbarians streaming across our (southern) borders is just one of them.
You mentioned communications. I would be in favor of using the internet to institute direct popular votes - as long as fairness and accuracy could be guaranteed - for president and almost all policy issues and legislation now voted on by congress. That would take care of almost all the Washington DC special interest BS. People would no longer be disenfranchised by politicians that say one thing to get elected and then do something different when in office.
Think about it. I actually see it as the only way out. All decisions would truly reflect the will of the people.
[edit on 5/2/2008 by centurion1211]