Global War: Trend, Accident, or Conspiracy?, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 09:03 PM by xpert11
reply to post by sweatmonicaIdo



Nothing really I was just wondering if the thought of turning the ideas at work into some kind of published work had occurred to you . All of that is Justin department not mine .

Cheers xpert11.


reply posted on 13-8-2008 @ 10:47 PM by sweatmonicaIdo
reply to post by xpert11




You want me to be honest, I want to turn this into a mini-series. Multiple mini-series.



reply posted on 1-9-2008 @ 06:35 AM by xpert11
reply to post by sweatmonicaIdo



IMO you are being to hard on yourself . Predicting events and nailing down an exact time frame are two differnt things. It is very difficult to pin point exactly when an event is going to take place unless you have access to some kind of information that gives you some direction on this matter . When I made predictions concerning the US future involvement in Africa I used something like a ten year frame time .Since you are the author surely you have the discretion to include or omit real life events as you see fit .


reply posted on 16-10-2008 @ 12:19 AM by sweatmonicaIdo
Sorry for such a long hiatus, but the continuing developments in terms of this economic/financial crisis has forced me to do a lot of soul-searching in my writing of the future of this country.

I guess its safe to say the whole paradigm has shifted. I wrote in my previous entries that 2009 will absolutely blow. However, I think I may have gotten many things wrong. For one thing (and this is something I gained from watching a YouTube video), common 21st century geopolitical thought is that World War III would be engaged with China. However, as we saw this past August, Russia is still very much a great power and in fact the only nation capable of offsetting the U.S. in terms of international relations. Furthermore the extensive business links between the U.S. and China serve as an insurance policy that prevents any sort of armed conflict from occuring. Especially at a time when the U.S. is at the mercy of China's economy (and vice versa), the likelihood either side would risk such ties is slim to none. Such an insurance policy does not, however, exist between the U.S. and Russia, making military confrontation between the two countries all the more likely.

A part of me also wants to backtrack and emphasize the internal affairs of the U.S. during the time of economic/financial crisis. As Glenn Beck recently pointed out, the likelihood of martial law being enacted due to civil unrest as a result of economic strife is very, very real.

Any comments would be appreciated.
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags