It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by mythatsabigprobe
The last time the ANWAR drilling motion came to the Senate was in 2005 when the Republicans had clear control and it was voted down in a fillibuster.
When the President (Clinton) signed the Executive Order designating 1.7 million acres of land in southwest Utah as the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument.
The coal is not only important for our nation's security. More importantly, it is low sulfer and low ash coal worth about a TRILLION dollars and only found in 2 other places in the world, Columbia and Indonesia.
Real intelligent conversation going on here
Solutions must be found. Viable ones, not pawing at the underlying problems.
Originally posted by plumranch
reply to post by jpm1602
Solutions must be found. Viable ones, not pawing at the underlying problems.
The world waits on pins and needles till the liberals find a viable solution to the energy crisis! And waits, and waits!
A real easy one would have been eight years ago, 1995. The House and Senate had both passed a bill to open ANWAR to drilling. BILL CLINTON vetoed it!. That oil would be online by now if he hadn't. And even though it may have only provided a few million barrels a day of petroleum, that probably would have had a significant effect in lowering gas prices. Market forces at word lowering prices!
Hope this helpes you see your way out of the forest!
reply to post by Sublime620
Not to mention deface one of the last pristine areas on the face of the planet.
Originally posted by plumranch
reply to post by mybigunit
I've illustrated several examples of how liberals (and I didn't say democrats because republicans and independants can get liberal too) were to blame for bad energy policy. I'm no energy expert but I do know that electing more liberals like Obama and Clinton will only get us into more trouble because they are forced to pander to the liberal environmentalists and others who got them into office. All we will get is more blame the oil companies and the Bushes and whomever else and years and years of no political action. Pelosi has proven how ineffective she is in this department so why elect more like her? At least if you elect someone besides another liberal you stand a chance of getting some action especially now that people are united in wanting something done.