It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Structures on Venus

page: 1

log in


posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 02:02 PM
image link:


[edit on 30-4-2008 by zero7]

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 02:06 PM
Nice one! Do you have any further information on this image? Thats gonna be difficult for anyone to explain away as a natural formation.

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 02:12 PM
Didn't want to post a one-liner but I was just curious.

Wouldn't that structure be absolutely gargantuan?

[edit on 30-4-2008 by BlaznRob]

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 02:21 PM
well.. besides the sturcture.. check out the LONG perfectly straight 'line' or dare i say 'runway', just off to the upper left of it in color pic just above it!!! If these are TRULY unshopped (sp) pic and ARE truly from Venus..........

ahhhh.. there aint NO debunking here !!

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 02:28 PM
That truly is awesome. I love it. =)

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 02:37 PM
Ok I'll be the first to throw a wrench...

While these are pretty cool pics, and I am not here to debunk, I think these look an awful lot like the pixel artifacts on many google map "structures."

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 02:49 PM
First off, zero7, thank you for sharing something that doesn't come neither from Mars nor from the Moon:

This looks to be an imageering issue, perhaps due to the work needed in order to connect different "stripes" collected during different orbits.
Here you can see what's the work that they do when they want to compose a mosaic with the stripes:

You can notice that there's a series of parallel strikes, each one of them fits the orientation of its original stripe:

in my opinion, the structures are the result of a unwanted "sliding" of the original formation, given their perfect match with the orientation of the stripe.

Basically, i guess that these (roughly) are the changes occurred during the

Note: this is just my opinion, i could be 10000% wrong

[edit on 30/4/2008 by internos]

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 02:55 PM
reply to post by internos

Internos, you stole my answer you jerk!

Haha, kiddin man, how do you get those animated pics done so fast??

Awesome job, I must agree with you. Star for your continued hard work on these boards. Someone needs to start paying you for this stuff. Sorry, I'm broke.

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 03:11 PM
Wow Internos
BRILLIANT job! Absolutely amazing!!

You are such an asset to ATS
The owners owe you a beer...or 2. LOL

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 04:51 PM
Well all that's left to say is that there's no structures
on Venus... venus,
'Cos maybe they've seen us... seen us.
Europe has a lot to answer for.
Anyone could've found something better to
rhyme with the planet's name.

Well... where next?

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 05:58 PM
Well it had to happen, structures on Mars and where there are Martians there must presumably be Venusians. No doubt Adamaski supporters will be crying "We told you so!"

Seriously though, do you guys really see ET ruins here? I mean you've taken a (Magellan?) picture and zoomed in a great deal. I'm not convinced there's anything real here I'm afraid!

[edit on 30-4-2008 by timelike]

posted on Apr, 30 2008 @ 06:12 PM
Well I was gonna say that's where Noah's ark ended up, but interno's erased that statement away with his good work.
I was gonna show what you did interno's, I really was.

new topics


log in