It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My personal hypothesis is as follows:
The official story timeline is correct. The governments only role was covering up their incompetence.
Originally posted by Jake the Dog Man
Actually, No, he has started this thread in spite of said people. All that has been asked is that it doesn't slide into a mass of fairy tales & cut n pasted web tripe.
Within the guidelines of the site, that is his right. Just move on if you don't agree, you are impressing nobody here.
Originally posted by whiteravenI have cut, welded, torched, hammered almost every metal out there and no...you cannot demo a building this way. If you could it would sure be a lot cheaper then the way we do it.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by ClashWhoThe idea that the WTC towers were wired with bombs is preposterous for a host of reasons. It takes months to wire buildings for demolition. Someone would have noticed.
Yeah, like you pester the maintenance men servicing the buildings you go into.
Originally posted by biggie smallsOh and that islamic terrorism myth perpetrated by western governments.
Originally posted by ANOKSo to put that in context with WTC2 ask yourself, what was it that acted on that top section to make it stop in mid air and then fall straight down?
Originally posted by freight tomsen
jfj123 is a mason/agent and he's been providing the establishment view of 9/11 here on ATS for a long time.
He has a Masonic eagle overlooking the burning towers,
a quote from the nihilist Nietzche,
and comes to ATS everyday to go point-counter-point with 9/11 truth-seekers.
I dealt with him a long time ago.
And Mods, don't delete my posts when I talk about the agents on ATS.
if you think I'm wrong
/crazy
/paranoid,
then that should be funny for you and you can just not take me seriously
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
reply to post by jfj123
Well if you guys are up to it we can still chit chat and just ignore the "vultures".
I have found arguing with them is a exercise in pointlessness and since the mods feel trolling a thread is perfectly acceptable, why don't we just ignore them and talk evidence for what we see?
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
Well if you guys are up to it we can still chit chat and just ignore the "vultures".
I have found arguing with them is a exercise in pointlessness and since the mods feel trolling a thread is perfectly acceptable, why don't we just ignore them and talk evidence for what we see?
Originally posted by ClashWho
Originally posted by bsbray11
Yeah, like you pester the maintenance men servicing the buildings you go into.
I don't, but WTC security does. What, do you think they were "in on it"?
Originally posted by Jake the Dog Man
I don’t know where you got the quote “crazy conspiracy theorists”, I never said such a thing on this thread.
“Last time I checked attacking someone else's viewpoint is not covered in freedom of speech”
… then you are using a different copy as everyone else. That is the very essence of everyone else's.
This thread has not “stifled” anyone, but it has pointed out the fact & proven the fact that most on this site can not bring themselves to not respond to every thread just to see their name in print.
It was asked at the beginning & through out to stay on topic and discuss the points supporting the official story. Your ego has out weighed your understanding the OP point.
Your responses seem to support that CTers have an ax to grind & have trouble telling fact from fiction... the agree with me or get out mentality.
I doubt you will come up with anything worthy of further response.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by ClashWho
Originally posted by bsbray11
Yeah, like you pester the maintenance men servicing the buildings you go into.
I don't, but WTC security does. What, do you think they were "in on it"?
Duh? It was freaking Securacom, just under a different name. Look it up. Do you know who Securacom is? This is the security company with ties to the Bush family and several infamous security breaches elsewhere.
Just so it doesn't come as a shock to you later, I think the PA was in on it, too. They were bringing in experts and figuring what could bring the buildings down back in 1984 when WTC7 was being constructed.
[edit on 1-5-2008 by bsbray11]