 |
reply posted on 24-10-2004 @ 06:15 PM by magickalworld
|
Harmony,
This is right from the USGS website:
Earthquakes with magnitude of about 2.0 or less are usually call microearthquakes; they are not commonly felt by people and are generally recorded
only on local seismographs. Events with magnitudes of about 4.5 or greater - there are several thousand such shocks annually - are strong enough to be
recorded by sensitive seismographs all over the world. Great earthquakes, such as the 1964 Good Friday earthquake in Alaska, have magnitudes of 8.0 or
higher.

I have received 7 e-mails from the USGS since yesterday stating that there were earthquakes off the coast of Honshu, Japan, and their magnitudes
ranged from 5.5 - 6.9.....Hundreds of other aftershocks were probably all in the 4.5 - 5.5 range.....I'm not saying that all the quakes on the
seismometers were from the Japan quake, but some of them definitely were.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-10-2004 @ 09:10 PM by HarmoniusOne
|
Originally posted by magickalworld
This is right from the USGS website:
Earthquakes with magnitude of about 2.0 or less are usually call microearthquakes; they are not commonly felt by people and are generally recorded
only on local seismographs. Events with magnitudes of about 4.5 or greater - there are several thousand such shocks annually - are strong enough to be
recorded by sensitive seismographs all over the world. Great earthquakes, such as the 1964 Good Friday earthquake in Alaska, have magnitudes of 8.0 or
higher.

Ya wouldn't think....
Thanks for clearing that up for me. I'm actually a little relieved.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-10-2004 @ 09:53 PM by Valhall
|
Thanks to member QuietSoul I can now share the Quake Analysis again! It is updated through 10/16.
Quake Analysis
Thank you so much QuietSoul!!! 
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-10-2004 @ 10:11 PM by justme1640
|
Thanks to Quietsoul and to Valhall --- I am such a dork I just love graphs and charts....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-11-2004 @ 02:05 PM by magickalworld
|
Vancouver Earthquake
Hey Harmony, Did you feel this quake around 2:00 a.m.?
earthquake.usgs.gov...
Pretty strong one!!
Magick
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-11-2004 @ 02:22 PM by HarmoniusOne
|
I did feel it. I was working on an ATS post and the beads on my lamps started swaying and then my recliner shook. I live in a mobile home so when
there's even a little one I feel it. This one felt like it lasted forever though so I figured it would be reported as a stronger one. Its
interesting to me that while there seem to be fewer eartquakes the past few weeks, the ones there are feel stronger. ValHall....Is this just the way
the cycle goes, in your opinion, or are we seeing something a little different now?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-11-2004 @ 02:46 AM by magickalworld
|
Vancouver Quake
I guess you felt all the aftershocks too then....I imagine that Oregon feels a lot of the "shakes" being between California and Washington, huh?!
A psychic on "Coast to Coast Live" with George Noory tonight said that he had a dream that Seattle would experience a big quake today (11/6) at
either 7:15 a.m. or 7:15 p.m., and there would be a 200 foot tsunami....I sure hope he is wrong!!
Magick
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-11-2004 @ 03:18 AM by HarmoniusOne
|
I hadn't heard that but it wouldn't surprise me. There has been some seismic activity up that way that no one seems to be paying alot of attention
to. But it seems like the kind of stuff that could be pointed to after a big quake as precursors. Like seismic activity on Mt Constitution, lots of
little stuff in Washington, Mt St Helens, and the Vancouver quakes in the last week.
But then a psychic did predict it. According to most of the people here (ATS) that means it wont happen.  U2U coming your way.....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-11-2004 @ 09:23 AM by Valhall
|
The quake analysis has been updated with data through 11/02.
Quake Analysis
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2004 @ 07:28 AM by Valhall
|
Quake analysis has been updated through 11/17
Quake Analysis
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2004 @ 12:22 AM by otlg27
|
Val:
I don't suppose you have long and lat points for all the quakes this year. Being a bit of a database master (no, I'm not talking about Access, I'm
talking real DBs), it might be fun to throw all that data into a database.... who am I kidding on second thought:
Do you know where I can get long and lat and magnitude numbers for earthquake for say the last 10-20 years in an easy to read (aka text) format to
toss into a database and see if we can get some neat shtuff as a result of some hardcore analysis?
Osiris
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2004 @ 01:58 AM by magickalworld
|
otlg 27,
Here is a list of historical databases with longs and lats of quakes at the USGS site:
neic.usgs.gov...
Have fun!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2004 @ 04:55 AM by Valhall
|
Originally posted by otlg27
Val:
I don't suppose you have long and lat points for all the quakes this year. Being a bit of a database master (no, I'm not talking about Access, I'm
talking real DBs), it might be fun to throw all that data into a database.... who am I kidding on second thought:
Do you know where I can get long and lat and magnitude numbers for earthquake for say the last 10-20 years in an easy to read (aka text) format to
toss into a database and see if we can get some neat shtuff as a result of some hardcore analysis?
Osiris 
otlg, you can go to NEIC and download the data yourself, or I can email you my spreadsheet. Here are the parameters I use in my query against their
database when I do an update:
Beginning date: 2004 - 1 - 1
End date: 2004 - last date of data in database
I always pull the entire year every time I update because it can take them weeks to a couple of months sometimes to add a quake, or determine its
final mag...so that way I know I've got the year accurately.
u2u if you want my spreadsheet.
[edit on 11-24-2004 by Valhall]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-12-2004 @ 01:21 PM by Valhall
|
The quake analysis has been updated with data through 12/01.
Quake Analysis
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-12-2004 @ 05:49 AM by Valhall
|
The Quake Analysis has been updated through 12/9:
Quake Analysis
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-12-2004 @ 08:59 AM by Valhall
|
The Quake Analysis has been updated through 12/15:
Quake Analysis
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-12-2004 @ 01:09 PM by ArMaP
|
Originally posted by Valhall
The Quake Analysis has been updated through 12/15:
Quake Analysis 
That includes this week's earthquake, that I felt while I was lunching.
It was one of the strongest earthquakes I ever felt, it was a 5.4 in the Richter scale and it was felt as a 4 in the modified Mecalli scale here in
the Lisbon region.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-12-2004 @ 07:03 AM by Valhall
|
The Quake Analysis has been updated through 12/22:
Quake Analysis
Please note this data is only through 12/22. With the extreme activity happening in the past 24 hours all red bars (estimates for year-end total
activity) are LOW.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-12-2004 @ 05:22 AM by Valhall
|
The quake analysis has been updated with data through 12/27:
Quake Analysis
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-12-2004 @ 08:26 AM by Valhall
|
Just wanted to point out something I've noticed on the quake activity since the big one.
There have been several 2.0 range earthquakes in Turkey ever since. They seem to have jumped up into the 3.0 range in the past 24 hours.
Also, we are now seeing activity in the Sea of Japan (two 5.0+ quakes so far today).
|
copyright & usage
|
 |