Intelligent Falling : Evangelical scientist refutes gravity, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 30-4-2008 @ 12:25 PM by Bigwhammy
reply to post by XyZeR



There is such a thing as evidence based faith. Back to my original analogy, if they hadn't had faith in the existence of the atom chemistry never would have happened before the invention of the electron microscope. Belief in macro evolution is entirely faith based as well, as there is absolutely zero observed data of one species transforming into another.

Can scientists observe quarks and sub atomic particles? Nope.... Oh well they see some evidence -- and then work on faith from there.


reply posted on 1-5-2008 @ 04:53 PM by Evil Genius
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
reply to
post by XyZeR



There is such a thing as evidence based faith. Back to my original analogy, if they hadn't had faith in the existence of the atom chemistry never would have happened before the invention of the electron microscope. Belief in macro evolution is entirely faith based as well, as there is absolutely zero observed data of one species transforming into another.

Can scientists observe quarks and sub atomic particles? Nope.... Oh well they see some evidence -- and then work on faith from there.


You really are a master manipulator of the english language. Using one definition of a word in place of an alternative definition of a word doesn't really fly. I'd say that the scientist, after seeing some evidence, works on the curiosity of discovering the unknown.


reply posted on 2-5-2008 @ 04:30 AM by madnessinmysoul
Originally posted by Bigwhammy
There is such a thing as evidence based faith. Back to my original analogy, if they hadn't had faith in the existence of the atom chemistry never would have happened before the invention of the electron microscope.


you're confusing faith with belief

they believed in the existence of atoms...they had reasoning and later evidence to back it up.


Belief in macro evolution is entirely faith based as well, as there is absolutely zero observed data of one species transforming into another.


oh really?

Observed Instances of Speciation
Here's MOAR

i wonder if you'll admit defeat or just move the goal posts back...

and we have some more evidence for evolution

here

and here

but i'm not entirely sure you'd take the time to look.


Can scientists observe quarks and sub atomic particles? Nope.... Oh well they see some evidence -- and then work on faith from there.


but we don't have to directly observe things. observation of reality via mathematical proofs and the life is still scientific evidence.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



How Are Plants Aware of the World Around Them?
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
The Genesis Code
  Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags
Explain Diversity Reloaded
  Posted 9 days ago with 3 member flags
Tree of Life and Tree of Knowledge
  Posted 4 days ago with 3 member flags
The carrot (chicken or egg , vegetable version)
  Posted 3 days ago with 3 member flags
A theory of proof of a God
  Posted 9 days ago with 2 member flags
Eden: The Double Sided Coin
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags
We are all connected with nature and The Universe IMO
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags