Originally posted by sizzle
reply to post by chise61
sounds like the stuff that was going on that made us break away from england for in the first place.
Some say no, and that the Queen or Regency is behind an evil plot, some say otherwise.
It's important to consider, that we in the UK and the Queen may not be behind the evil planners, but that the British Government then, as the U.S.A
now , is tricked and governed through Admiralty law by an inner corrupting influence, the elite bankers.
One example to consider is freemasonary, along with all corruptible inner socieities. The Queen is the Head. But does that make her the head of
corruption? Hold on... not necessarily, she is also the head of the sheeple and the good people. The Monarch had limited powers, and it is up to the
people to steer their government, particulalry in point of acceptance, about which the Monarch can do little, but accept, whatever the monarch or
their intelligence officers know!
The point I'm driving at is this: it's not so much freedom from England, but freedom from the corrupt influences of bankers that was not gained.
You may reason conversely, that the influence of the Queen in Canada and America, slows down the corruptoin, and gives us some space. Why? because the
monarch has their own Intelligence officers who take action where they can on behalf of goodness and freedom. For this there is recent evidence, as
well as historic:
and particularly releases of this year such as :
Look for reports there on how the Crown personally called in Blair, in an effort to topple the Bush crime syndicate, even sending armed personnel over
to the USA, and delivering ultimatums to Obama.
There is much to learn from that source of intelligence.
Please pass on the link, and please take a good look. Check out the authors' credentials.
Just over two years ago the Queen said 'we are living in dark times'. I take that to mean , it is not a corrupt people, reflected in their corrupt
government, but a corrupt inner government. It is that, I suggest, which American States and unions failed to get free of, although they were almost
free at the start. They simply quickly established themselves, possibly because common understanding blamed the Crown for the people's ills, no doubt
through propaganda machines, like we have now, which are funded and not free speech.
Richard Harris ( a Freeman on the Land), has stated how unfortunate position the monarch is in nowadays, where she is vilifieed by the people and
press, held responsible for the people's parliament.
So far as any lands and monies being held in the Monarch's Soveriegn name, on behalf of the people, I think that's is the safeguard which protects
the land and property from being amassed by a the corrupt elite, and held by them, in bogus and fictitious company names.
[edit on 8-7-2009 by bolly]