It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CreeWolf
In the end, I think our great-grandchildren will be sterile, speaking Chinese, and shopping at Huan-Mart.
[edit on 28-4-2008 by CreeWolf]
Originally posted by jkrog08
I have been thinking recently about how WW3 would start(if it did)and I can't find hardly anyway it would realistically.I thought I would share my scenario and ask for others.Keep in mind this is not a nuclear exchange,but conventional war.
[edit on 4/27/2008 by jkrog08]
Originally posted by tyranny22
My opinion is that WWIII will start with the collapse of the World Trade Centers.
We first had European War I.
Then we saw European/Pacific War II.
Now we're engaged in World War III - the only REALLY World War. You've heard time and again that threats of the "global war on terror". It's being hyped as such without actually using the term WWIII.
It's begun and it'll never end because we, as people of the United States, don't care enough about the rest of the world to end it.
Originally posted by magicmushroom
JKRog, in your feelings and views of a 3rd World War can you imagine nukes raining down on the US. Irrespective of what counter measures you have some would get through maybe many. Chemical and biological weapons may also be used. In the past America has enjoyed security from its physical location but that can no longer be guaranteed.
In such an scenario is it worth enduring such a calamity especially if you started the war but was not directly attacked or invaded. Such as with the ME now, is the rik of attacking Iran worth the possible retaliation from those who could greviously hurt you.