I wouldn't want to be anywhere near one of them, either.
The items they describe that would be disposed of there seem harmless enough, but all the same, I'd prefer distance from it.
NEWS: Experts Play Down Nuclear Dump, page 1
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 26-2-2004 @ 10:25 PM by OzChris
Experts have played down the use of land to make nuclear waste dump. They believe the radiation to be of "acceptable" levels, and the area to be
used is in a negligable zone, in terms of earthquakes.
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation acting executive director Ron Cameron said it was important the public understood the issues regarding the generation, storage and transportation of low-level radioactive waste.
Mr Cameron was speaking in Adelaide today at an Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency public forum on the safety of the proposed low-level radioactive waste dump in South Australia's north.
Dr Cameron said low-level radioactive waste was just that - waste material which emitted low levels of radiation - and was comprised of items such as laboratory coats, rubber gloves and glass.
These materials were generated for activities such as the delivery of diagnostic and therapeutic radioisotopes for nuclear medicine procedures.
"If you stood two metres away from a truck full of low-level waste for one hour without moving, you would receive less radiation than you would if you flew to Los Angeles and back," he said.
Dr Cameron said a recent New South Wales government inquiry into low-level waste supported ANSTO's claims about the minimal risks associated with the transport of low-level radioactive waste.
The Australian Democrats told the forum the risk of earthquake should be enough to stop the dump, proposed for a site 20km east of Woomera.
The Democrats said it would be irresponsible to locate it near the same fault line that rocked Adelaide with a major quake in 1954.
Democrats MP Sandra Kanck said the Torrens fault line stretched from Kangaroo Island to Torrens Lake in outback SA, next to the proposed site.
"The brief history of European settlement throughout South Australia only adds to the concern that the dump will eventually be rocked by an earthquake," Ms Kanck said.
The Federal Department of Education, Science and Training, which would be the owner and have overall responsibility for the dump, told the forum today the site near Woomera was the best location.
Dr Caroline Perkins, from the department's radioactive waste management section, said the risks of an earthquake were negligible.
"This has been a very boring place for the last 30 million years," Dr Perkins said of the site's seismic, tectonic and volcanic activity.
"This really has been a very stable area."
Personally I would not like to be anywhere near one of these so called dumps... No matter how "safe" they are reported to be.
TheAustralian
[Edited on 27-2-2004 by Zion Mainframe]
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation acting executive director Ron Cameron said it was important the public understood the issues regarding the generation, storage and transportation of low-level radioactive waste.
Mr Cameron was speaking in Adelaide today at an Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency public forum on the safety of the proposed low-level radioactive waste dump in South Australia's north.
Dr Cameron said low-level radioactive waste was just that - waste material which emitted low levels of radiation - and was comprised of items such as laboratory coats, rubber gloves and glass.
These materials were generated for activities such as the delivery of diagnostic and therapeutic radioisotopes for nuclear medicine procedures.
"If you stood two metres away from a truck full of low-level waste for one hour without moving, you would receive less radiation than you would if you flew to Los Angeles and back," he said.
Dr Cameron said a recent New South Wales government inquiry into low-level waste supported ANSTO's claims about the minimal risks associated with the transport of low-level radioactive waste.
The Australian Democrats told the forum the risk of earthquake should be enough to stop the dump, proposed for a site 20km east of Woomera.
The Democrats said it would be irresponsible to locate it near the same fault line that rocked Adelaide with a major quake in 1954.
Democrats MP Sandra Kanck said the Torrens fault line stretched from Kangaroo Island to Torrens Lake in outback SA, next to the proposed site.
"The brief history of European settlement throughout South Australia only adds to the concern that the dump will eventually be rocked by an earthquake," Ms Kanck said.
The Federal Department of Education, Science and Training, which would be the owner and have overall responsibility for the dump, told the forum today the site near Woomera was the best location.
Dr Caroline Perkins, from the department's radioactive waste management section, said the risks of an earthquake were negligible.
"This has been a very boring place for the last 30 million years," Dr Perkins said of the site's seismic, tectonic and volcanic activity.
"This really has been a very stable area."
Personally I would not like to be anywhere near one of these so called dumps... No matter how "safe" they are reported to be.
TheAustralian
[Edited on 27-2-2004 by Zion Mainframe]
Pages: ^^TOP^^
Google announces privacy settings change across products; users can\'t opt out
Posted 19 days ago with 78 member flags
Posted 19 days ago with 78 member flags
BREAKING: Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran\'s nuclear scientists, U.S. officials tell NBC
Posted 3 days ago with 74 member flags
Posted 3 days ago with 74 member flags
FDA\'s New Claim: "Your Body Is a Drug—and We Have the Authority to Regulate It"
Posted 10 days ago with 53 member flags
Posted 10 days ago with 53 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.056 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.056 seconds
