The professor described himself as a "flag-waving and card-carrying evolutionist and, about half the time, an atheist," but said evolutionary
theory has not explained how the first living cells came into being.
"I now believe with about 60% certainty that the first living things were intelligently designed by a creator," Rainbow said.
That is a very big percentage of unknowns, I am nothing but atheist and I have been reading about the possible begining's of intelligent lifes
origin's, and that too has it's questions to some of the answers, if weare to persue such incinations of podering's, we must be prepared for the
"Loose End's" of every staggering response of the answers.
There have been the on going inquiries of the origins of life, you
know "Where it began" and the all time favorite "Will it all end?".
I have been trying to get some kind of baring on the effects of the
collasal 'Big Bang Theory' and weighing towards the implications of
the current discoveries of newly discovered lost civilizations from
the Phoenicians to the christians. Even some that date back to the
very existance of the belief system's beginning's itself. There are
no 'Cut-and-Dry' rebuttles to any of the questions I have insued upon
and I am finally coming to the conclusion that our 'Intelligences'
have over come the very true existance of how and why we are even
here. We have initiated "Invention's" which have existed years and
millenia before our time, we have crouched for low flying objects and
jumped when the even lower flying one's embarked at us.
I for one think that there probably is intelligent life some where in
the Cosmos, but what the acquirements of thier structure or thier
molecular make up is (If not DNA) is a hit or miss assumption with no
real educational and practical guess in it's application of this to
be "Factual" or "Fictional" , and to make matter's even more hard
struck for thought's, we continually battle over the "Who's right and
who's wrong?" characteristic beliefs of something that was handed
down to us by peer's or the over exuberant rants of a man of the
clothe.For this matter I am posting for the possibilities of not
really finding the 'Preverbial' answer's , it is more or less to find
out why we as individuals of the same species have different aspects,
belief's and conclusions to why we are all here in the first place.
Sciences have taken off like a perverbial Rocket in the past few
decades and as I had said before , the 'New' discoveries of Ancient
Civilizations is actually rewriting the history book's for all man
kind, "But why is it so important too have this data of 'Conflict'
and 'Distortion' if it only raises more of the 'Inconclusive'
question's to be added to the already long list of 'What If's?'
already in place?"
I have mentioned Niel DeGrasse Tyson a few times in the past since I
have been a member, but the reason for the intrigue of his statements
is that there is no big 'Statement's' . And if I were to have to makea
bonofied choice this very second of my breath's, I would choose to
believe Mr. Tyson's opinion's on the very existance of life and that
we will probably by no means be able too riddle the question's that
we inquire upon. Not this topic, 'Existance and Origins' anyway.
Here is a short read for those of you that are interested in this
particular topic. It is an interview from the Public Broadcasting
Service that featured Niel DeGrasse Tyson as it's guest. Very down to
earth and very non-confusing statements and analogies by a premier
Astrophysist and his acknowledgements of what it takes to be part of
the facilitations of figuring out the 'Origins'.
ttp://www.pbs. org/wgbh/ nova/origins/ tyson.html>
Also, "Please do reply with your own expierience of how you came to
be the way you are with influences and just your preprogrammed up
bringing's if you have different views of the current 'Status Quo'."
It's only my 2 cents worth.
