It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Actually, his claims are on topic.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
MajKarma and his ilk have made the accusation that there are disinformation agents ...
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by MajKarma
I have no control of or interest in this friend and foe silliness and have not chosen or engaged any of you. As for your small mind comment; I am an Engineer with a Stanford MBA and am an ex marine corp officer. I have socks older than most here. So, spare me the rhetoric from the Green Lattern and have whatever system you like.
I don't care if who you are, or what you're supposed background is. For all we know, you could be telling the truth, or you could be lying; therefore, you're about as real as the Green Lantern.
But it does strike me as odd that someone with your supposed background and education would propose or endorse a system like the one you did. Color me skeptical...
And yes, we will continue to use the same system we've been using. It seems to be working out just fine. If you don't like it, you know where the door is.
Originally posted by MajKarma
As for the star/rating system, this too is a done subject.
So you say, now that you've been beaten into the ground over it.
And by the way, we're still waiting for you to name and prove there are disinfo agents here.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by thetruth777
That leads me to question your purpose of joining ATS.
One does not have to believe every claim that is voiced here.
Originally posted by thetruth777
If anyone is a DisInformation agent, it is SaviorComplex.
Really now? I must be really getting in your craw.
Prove it, child. Show one single shred of evidence that I am a disinformation agent, outside of the sin of being a skeptic.
[edit on 28-4-2008 by SaviorComplex]
Originally posted by thetruth777
Prove it? Oh, I don't have to. Alex Jones, Loose Change, and Freedom to Fascism already did all the work for me.
Originally posted by thetruth777
Because here on ATS, the burden of prof lies with the skeptic.
Originally posted by redmage
I have a strong feeling that MajKarma's discussion of specific members, instead of the topic at hand, was an influential factor in why his account is no longer active.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by thetruth777
Prove it? Oh, I don't have to. Alex Jones, Loose Change, and Freedom to Fascism already did all the work for me.
Wait? What?
How does any of that prove I am a disinformation agent? That some odd reasoning...
Originally posted by thetruth777
Because here on ATS, the burden of prof lies with the skeptic.
Really now? I doubt that rule can be found anywhere in the T&C or any of the social mores on this board.
Every reasonable person on this board would agree the burden of proof lies with person making the claim, regardless of their status as skeptic or believer.
Now, being you are the one who is making the claim that I am a disinformation agent, the burden of proof is on you.
Now prove it, show the evidence, or drop the claim.
[edit on 28-4-2008 by SaviorComplex]
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by redmage
I have a strong feeling that MajKarma's discussion of specific members, instead of the topic at hand, was an influential factor in why his account is no longer active.
Considering how often the label of "disinfo agent" is thrown around by the small-minded and intellectually challenged, I doubt that lead to his ban. It may have been his threats of violence against people who did not agree with him.
[edit on 28-4-2008 by SaviorComplex]
Originally posted by thetruth777
I wasn't saying you were a disinfo agent, idiot. I was only claiming that you have no proof against my statements.
Originally posted by thetruth777
If anyone is a DisInformation agent, it is SaviorComplex.
Originally posted by thetruth777
Site at least ONE reference as to WHY 9/11 was NOT an inside job, and it better not be the Popular Mechanics article, as it was debunked. And do you have ANY evidence to prove thaat mainstream media is reliable?
Originally posted by thetruth777
Also, why do you delete all comments with which you, at least slightly, disagree, from your comments page?
Ummm...who is debating 9/11? I think you are confused again. No one brought up 9/11...
Originally posted by thetruth777
With no way to prove me wrong, you resort to calling me "confused"...
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by thetruth777
With no way to prove me wrong, you resort to calling me "confused"...
No one even brought up 9/11. 9/11 has nothing to do with this conversation. 9/11 is not the topic. You're the only one ranting and raving about it.
The topic is disinformation agents, which you accused me of being, and still refuse to provide one shred of evidence for, by the way.
Originally posted by RuneSpider
SaviorComplex, stop feeding the troll. Ignore him if you have to.
Originally posted by RuneSpider
SC, yeah he called you a disnfo agent, any person who uses research found anywhere else other than a webpage or Youtube get's called a disinfo agent here.