posted on Apr, 25 2008 @ 09:28 AM
Beechnut - I raised specific objections about engineers who provided the official theories on the collapses. There are other criticisms such as their
employment with the Department of Defense through the Blast Mitigation for Structures Program. In fact as federal agencies, FEMA & NIST have
institutional conflicts of interest that guarantee a lack of independence.
You on the other hand make non-specific attacks on Gage, the strongest of which seems to be "he's only doing it for the money". Does it not occur
to you how ridiculous that accusation sounds? NIST are awarded a multimillion dollar budget by the Bush government, but the purity of their quest for
the truth wheresoever it takes them is, in your mind, beyond doubt?
Make a valid contribution by offering specific examples of how Gage "messed up all the information about 9/11".
I should follow tezzajw's advice and drop the silliness about 0.00087 engineers. Hundreds of them, including senior federal engineers and scientists,
have gone public about their dissatisfaction with the government sponsored reports. You're assumption that all the other engineers in the world have
studied and subscribed to one or more of the mutually exclusive official theories is absurd. So much for good science. Are you angling for a job at
[edit on 25-4-2008 by EvilAxis]