It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Film: How the Towers Fell: Blueprint for Truth

page: 3
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 25 2008 @ 09:28 AM
link   
Beechnut - I raised specific objections about engineers who provided the official theories on the collapses. There are other criticisms such as their employment with the Department of Defense through the Blast Mitigation for Structures Program. In fact as federal agencies, FEMA & NIST have institutional conflicts of interest that guarantee a lack of independence.




You on the other hand make non-specific attacks on Gage, the strongest of which seems to be "he's only doing it for the money". Does it not occur to you how ridiculous that accusation sounds? NIST are awarded a multimillion dollar budget by the Bush government, but the purity of their quest for the truth wheresoever it takes them is, in your mind, beyond doubt?

Make a valid contribution by offering specific examples of how Gage "messed up all the information about 9/11".

I should follow tezzajw's advice and drop the silliness about 0.00087 engineers. Hundreds of them, including senior federal engineers and scientists, have gone public about their dissatisfaction with the government sponsored reports. You're assumption that all the other engineers in the world have studied and subscribed to one or more of the mutually exclusive official theories is absurd. So much for good science. Are you angling for a job at NIST?

[edit on 25-4-2008 by EvilAxis]




posted on Apr, 25 2008 @ 11:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by beachnut
It is ironic that UBL's group is debunking 9/11 truth. Looks like 9/11 truth needs to fill in UBL on the hearsay and false information that he was not involved. He laughs at 9/11 truth's fantasy and false stories.

What does this have to do with how the towers fell? Are trying to derail the thread and get somebody to play your game here? You want to start a conspiracy within a conspiracy debate, you are just are waiting for the "Osama and his group were funded and trained by the CIA" argument so you can try to debunk that instead, don't you? Besides, Osama claimed his innocence after the attack.


Originally posted by beachnut
Take the worlds engineers, the total. Take the total 9/11 truth engineers. Find the percentage! Good luck.

That is faulty logic. You are assuming that any engineer that doesn't disagree with the offical story must be in support of it. What about all of the engineers who have never read any of the official reports, let alone seen any evidence or blueprints for the towers.



posted on Apr, 26 2008 @ 04:04 AM
link   
How come you have whole websites with engineers that are against the official story ?



new topics
 
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join