It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Neo-Con Calls For Shredding Constitution, Imposing World Government

page: 2
20
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 21 2008 @ 12:42 PM
link   
Here's the method behind the madness of a NWO.

It's called the Codex Alimentarius.


Paul Hellyer in his book, "The Evil Empire," states: "Codex Alimentarius is supported by international banks and multinational corporations including some in Canada, and is in reality a bill of rights for these banks and the corporations they control. It will hand over our sovereign rights concerning who may or may not invest in our countries to an unelected world organization run by big business. The treaty would make it impossible for Canadian legislators either federal or provincial to alter or improve environmental standards for fear of being sued by multinational corporations whether operating in Canada or not.

This will create a world without borders ruled by a virtual dictatorship of the world's most powerful central banks and multinational companies. This world is an absolute certainty if we all sit on our hands and do nothing."

This is the future the FDA and FTC are striving to bring us via Codex harmonization. Is this a future we are going to willingly accept or prevent?
Codex Alimentarius - The Sinister Truth Behind Operation Cure-All




posted on Apr, 21 2008 @ 03:25 PM
link   
reply to post by goosdawg
 


Right.


Zionism is an international political movement that originally supported the reestablishment of a homeland for the Jewish People in Palestine (Hebrew: Eretz Yisra'el, “the Land of Israel”), and continues primarily as support for the modern state of Israel.


WIki

So I will continue to await a real explanation.



posted on Apr, 21 2008 @ 09:12 PM
link   
Hell, sence the days of washington and hamilton have they been trying to do away with the Constitution. Hamilton fought Adams and Jefferson every step of the way to my understanding.



posted on Apr, 22 2008 @ 04:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by LDragonFire
They have a plan to destroy the USA, 9/11 was allowed to happen because could a terrorist in a cave take away our freedoms? Nope but our current government sure did, and did without hesitation.

They need our economy to tank, because they want the North American Union to be born, and can you imagine just what kind of constitution it will have with the PTB we have now writing it!

Viva la Revolucion!, all that remains is a spark, but what kind of spark will take us away from cable TV and our cell phones and computers??


The only one I could think of is if a complete systems crash or the burst of people's little bubbles. (close ones dying of a bio-attack, starvation, major loss of employment, etc.)

A plague, in my opinion, is very possible since I heard most of these people have PhDs and the way such an attack could be carried out by some suicide carrier without being noticed.

A system crash would involve more planning.

Still likely due to computers, but more of a chance of such a plan failing.

By the way, what's a neo-con and what's with the NA Union have to do with the Trade Centers?

[edit on 22-4-2008 by Ihavenoidea]


CX

posted on Apr, 22 2008 @ 05:02 AM
link   
Seems to me that the administration has been slowly taking away people rights under the constitution for a while now, and as someone has said here already, people will just carry on just talking about it whilst it happens.

By the time the moment of shredding the constitution comes, it will just be the physical act of putting the piece of paper through a shredder left to do. The rest is already being done now.

How much is enough? Every time something else gets stripped away from our friends across the water, it has lready been talked to death and predicted on here and thousand other sites like this. Every time, people say they will never stand for it.

Yet every time.......they do.

CX.



posted on Apr, 22 2008 @ 11:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Rockpuck
 

Most "Jews" (a.k.a. "Jewish") are not Zionists. Listen to a great historian (not me), who tells some history about the Zionists.


Interesting points from Jim Condit, Jr.'s film "The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis"


Hitler & the Zionists part 1 of 2


Hitler & the Zionists part 2 of 2


Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews (2006)


About Video 3:

Manchester, England. 2nd November 2006. Alan Hart speaks at a public meeting of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC). He speaks about his two volume book "Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews".

The original venue, St Peter's Chaplaincy, informed PSC that it was unwilling to host the meeting--2 days before the event--despite the fact that the booking had been paid for many weeks in advance. Anticipating this, the PSC booked a reserve venue--the Friends Meeting House.

Alan Hart, a young 63, has been engaged with events in the Middle East and their global consequences and terrifying implications - the possibility of a Clash of Civilisations, Judeo-Christian v Islamic, and, along the way, another great turning against the Jews - for nearly 40 years: * As a correspondent for ITN's News At Ten and the BBC's Panorama programme (covering wars and conflicts wherever they were taking place in the world). * As a researcher and author. (His first book Arafat, Terrorist or Peacemaker? was published by Sidgwick & Jackson in 1984 and subsequently in several updated editions over a decade). * As a participant at leadership level, working to a Security Council background briefing, in the covert diplomacy of the search for peace.

Alan Hart thus brings to the pages of his latest book, Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, and to the debating chamber, a deep understanding of why, really, the Countdown to Armageddon is on and how it can be stopped.

He's been to war with the Israelis and the Arabs but the learning experience he values most, and which he believes gave him rare insight, came from his one-to-one private conversations over the years with many leaders on both sides of the conflict. With, for example, Golda Meir, Mother Israel, and Yasser Arafat, Father Palestine. The significance of these private conversations was that they enabled Alan to be aware of the truth of what leaders really believed and feared as opposed to what they said in public for propaganda and myth-sustaining purposes.

It was because of his special relationships with leaders on both sides that, in 1980, Alan found himself sucked into the covert diplomacy of conflict resolution. President Carter had been prevented by Prime Minister Begin from involving the PLO in the peace process, an opening made possible because Arafat had signalled, secretly and seriously, that he was ready to make peace with an Israel inside more or less its pre-1967 borders. Carter was in despair and said, in private, that events had once again proved that it was impossible to advance the peace process by institutional diplomacy (because of the pork-barrel nature of American politics and the Zionist lobby's awesome influence). It was then suggested to AH that he should undertake an unofficial, covert diplomatic mission to get an exploratory dialogue going between Arafat and Peres, with AH initially the linkman. The assumption at the time was that Peres would win Israel's next election and deny Begin a second term.... The initiative was funded by a small number of wealthy British Jews led by Marcus Sieff (the Chairman of Marks and Spencer) with the approval of Lord Victor Rothschild....


[edit on 22-4-2008 by ChadAndrewATS]



new topics

top topics
 
20
<< 1   >>

log in

join