I do not want to seem rude here but isn’t this a case of “Seeing faces in the clouds”? It seems to me like the OP is DESPERATE to find
something/anything and is so delusional over proving his fantasies that he will come up with any excuse within his own mind as to why others can
not/will not see the things he believes to be there.
I also ask what qualifications/education the OP has in regard to these fields of study he is bringing up, does he have any education in Geology,
Astronomy or Photography? To enforce his theories about the statements he has made about the photos?
Not that I claim to be an expert in any of these fields, I only have some of the basics, being from the UK I have GCSE’s in Physics and Geography,
which does not really include discussion over impact craters. However to me what the OP is showing here to me seems to be a standard “large”
impact crater and nothing more, from my understanding of them.
Just because some of the lines/shadows in the photograph happen to be straight does not prove anything, such as being artificial. You only have to
look at the Earth it self to be amazed by some of the things nature can create. The
Giant's
Causeway in Ireland would be a great example of such things.
[edit on 12/5/2008 by Shinji]