It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Conspiracy of Sex and Drugs

page: 1
4
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 02:12 PM
link   
Have you read Brave New World? The author, Aldous Huxley, admitted that the scenario he envisioned in his book were the actual plans of the Global Elite; NOT some fictional novel.


In the book, there is a world government. Babies are produced in test tubes in a factory. Normal childbirth is considered savage and frowned upon by society. Whenever someone has a few hours, or even minutes, of free time from work, they are strongly encouraged to take Soma, which gives them "harmless high", and, most importantly, prevents them from thinking critically about their society. Children, from an early age, engage in sex play and are taught that sex is NOT taboo. In the book, people are discouraged from perusing long-term relationships, and instead, date a new person each week. In a sense, people have "loveless sex" in brave New World.




Is that not what is happening to our society? We are heading towards world government (globalism). We already have the capacity to make a cloned child. People, especially 14-28 year olds can date a new person every month. Unmarried sex is now common; in the 19th and 20th centuries it was taboo. In fact, the word "ba$tard" initially meant someone born outside a marriage. In Brave New World, everyone spent their free time in drug-induced high. Now, over 50% of all high school graduates have tries marijuana. 35% of those tries it again. In the book, people are discouraged from persuing long-term relationships. Up till the Victorian Age, being "married" meant "bound for life", and it was a HUGE deal to divorce. Now, 40% (if my memory serves me) of all marriages end in a divorce. Pornography perverts children and teaches them that sex is not taboo; that masturbating is OK.



Not, about porn. Pornography is what we can say is at the heart of the sex conspiracy. Pornography perverts our childrens' minds and indirectly influences them to have teen sex. MTV as well, but not as overtly. Teen sex= loveless sex= loveless marriage= divorce= the degradation of human values= society engineering.


Like in Brave New World, children now engage in sex play.



Now, who is behind the explosion in porn and drugs?




It is a well-documented fact that the CIA has been involved in the illegal drug trade for three purposes:

1. To make money
2. To create crime, offer solution of police state
3. To engineer our culture


Remember, a drug-induced state is part of the Elite's plans.


Now for sex.



The CIA was involved in MONARCH trauma-based mind control. Involved in shattering personalities to produce cointel agents, assassins, spies, and sex slaves. CIA was heavily involved in the porn industry.

1. To make money
2. Society Engineering


If the CIA put drugs on our streets, and was involved in the porn industry, is it that big of a jump to conclude that the CIA may have put porn on our hard drives?


Problem created. Solution offered? We take control of the net, eliminate porn, as well as anything else we deem necessary, LIKE FREE SPEECH! Like Infowars.


I explained above how porn corrupts our young minds and indirectly leads to divorces and loveless sex.



This is how our culture is being engineered.




posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 02:34 PM
link   
I don't see pornography as harmfully, nor sex before marriage. I believe both are personal choice. I am pro-marijuana as well, but when it comes to other drugs what you said about the CIA is true. Very true, I liked it and never saw the police state motive.

But saying sex is evil and porn is evil is misleading. In fact when porn is legalized in a region, violent sex crimes tend to go down. Depravity of things such as porn and sex lead to worse than bad marriages if that is the cause. You end up with Catholic priests and little boys....



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 03:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Tenebrous
 

Sex and Porn are not necessarily bad things, its the context they are put into. Its the fact thats its advertised to everyone with no regard for how they might take it. Not everyone is responsible, and when its pushed upon young minds who have yet to understand the depths of procreation, it breeds individuals who are more focused on sex than they are on survival, balance or prosperity.

For one, we have a society where women think men cant go five minutes without thinking about sex, which I think is absurd, I hold sex sacred and to think of it in any context except for procreation, just further justifies a disregard for the balance of everything. I being a man, find that many other men agree with the every five minutes thing, and that just goes to show how much they have come to know the depths of their being.

Im not religious at all, just from trial and error, I have found its much easier to have a balanced mind about you if you do not partake in things that are biased by rotten choices. Like Porn and or the drug scene.

Besides, who knows if that girl you are looking at made the right choices in being a porn star, maybe she is your friends niece who has a drug problem and that the only way she can pay for it is through a market that is fueled by lust driven urges rather than well thought out plans for prosperity.

I guess if your well thought out plan for prosperity is praying on the weak minds of humans exploiting their sacred existence for money no matter what the moral cost, then so be it.

For all you porn addicts, can you imagine a life without fictitious relationships with your meat?
Can you imagine what you might think about if you weren't stopped by the thought of sex once an hour or whatever?
Imagine what you would be able to accomplish mentally if all of your bodily energies were never wasted on illusory situations.
Imagine how your wife would feel if she knew she was the only thing that could satisfy you?
Imagine you might have a wife because of all the time you spent in public rather than watching porn.
Or you may watch it with your wife to spice up the sex life, which to me, just says we're not attracted to each other, maybe cause the dude watched too much porn and now regular sex wont cut it?

I dunno, I have a bias perception because I used to date a chick who was in porn, and the lifestyle it provided was hardly a healthy one. I even used to be into porn, but when I got to see it first hand, it dawned on me, that this is so wrong, most of the girls in it are scared and dont want to be there, and the camera men just treat them like crap, and its sad, but thats the kind of attitude that sells porn, I mean look at how corrupt it is, there is rape porn, child porn, death porn, blood porn, poop porn, animal porn, granny porn, quadriplegic midget porn, etc.

I mean no offense to anyone, I respect everyones choices, some of my best friends to this day are porn addicts and porn actresses.



[edit on 4/19/2008 by psychedeliack]



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 03:34 PM
link   
Good points. I was meaning it in more of a response to the OP. It stated that basically drugs, sex and porn were evil. The idea being it is a means of corrupting and controlling us. I was just making the argument that SOME drugs aren't necessarily evil, and that porn and Prue marital sex, while may be morally questionable to some, are not really bad enough to bring about the conspiracy that the OP had in mind.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tenebrous
Good points. I was meaning it in more of a response to the OP. It stated that basically drugs, sex and porn were evil. The idea being it is a means of corrupting and controlling us. I was just making the argument that SOME drugs aren't necessarily evil, and that porn and Prue marital sex, while may be morally questionable to some, are not really bad enough to bring about the conspiracy that the OP had in mind.



I also made references to how the explosion of sex and drugs correlates to the Elite's plans for society, as outlined in Brave New World.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 03:57 PM
link   
I think that sex which has been around forever, and illegal drugs which also have been around forever, have nothing to do with the elite. It's MTV, reality TV, zoloft, Prozac, and other prescription legal drugs which are part of the attempt to complicate the general populous. I have yet to meet someone who will not go out because they have porn to watch, but have run into many that wont go out because they have to see who is getting voted off of American Idol, or the Apprentice, or so on. These shows are the real evil. MSM helps by for a good example this election coverage. By focusing on the gossip, the he said she said, Obama's church etc., the actual policies (if there are any) of the candidates is not even mentioned. Even our politics has taken on a reality TV feel. The elite are pushing the legal drugs on the general populous. Porn is not going to be the downfall of Western Civilization, but who Britney Spears marries next week might.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 04:05 PM
link   
Id have to agree with Aldous, Im a big fan of his work, I just stated what I did for the sake of perhaps liberating anyone from the grips of their own evil.

I think you have to step outside the porn/drug box to be able to see it like such, no drugs is evil, but they are evil if you are using them for recreation rather than a deeper understanding of the universe. Same with sex in all aspects.

The media portrays sex and drugs in a recreational format. Both of which are not recreational acts if you look at sages and mystics.

Its acquainted to Occult Elites of negative influence using their knowledge of human nature to keep us bound in lower level thinking through promoting and allowing the promotion of, sex drugs and violence.

Im not saying all elites are evil, and Im not saying all occult practices are evil either, Im saying they have made us think all of occultism is evil so we dont dig into the facts to find out the kind of energy the evil ones reap from people jacking off to porn and doing drugs for recreation rather than purity and understanding.

sorry if im still off topic

This subject is closely related to that documentary The Century of the Self, its about how Freud's crowd psychology is used in the media/economy to manipulate us into being consumers to the very core. Its the same psychology that pushes sex and drugs on the streets. It trickles down from the infrastructures set in place by Freudian philosophy. (Im a Jungian)

[edit on 4/19/2008 by psychedeliack]



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 04:10 PM
link   
This work yo speak of seems to have a hidden religous agenda, more than a serious exploration of how the lite are keeping us preoles down. If you want read that explores ways tahst were written down 50 years ago, but are coming true today, read George Orwells 1985. Everything from a perpetual war, to an axis fo evil, even a man that the government fixates everyones hate on is in there.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 04:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Tenebrous
 

Interesting, I dont read much fiction, but a visionary fiction like you proposed sounds like a good read. Thanks for the suggestion

btw, here is a link to the documentary I mentioned
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 4/19/2008 by psychedeliack]



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 04:32 PM
link   
I'm sorry I have to get studying, I will look into thats link, But Orwell's 1984 is one of the most powerfull and influencial books of the last 50 years, I am suprised you have not heard of it. It's the book that coined the term "Big Brother"



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 05:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Tenebrous
 


Maybe wrong to call it fiction at all. I mean, if someone writes a book that ends up becoming true, is it prophecy, or just healthy observation? I guess the general idea would be visionary, but the specific characters might make it fiction. What I want to know, is who is writing the 1985 of our generation? Is it fiction writers, or non fiction scientists/philosophers(journalists) writing visionary scenarios for the future? Or is there even a difference?
sorry OP, off subject



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 05:14 PM
link   
Once you read 1985, we are knowhere near, it is a frightening dis-utopia of the future. But there are some parrells, and it is a very good book to read for any politcally minded individual, the events perceived in 1985 have not come to pass. 1985, although written in the 40's is still single best forwarning of a totalitarian world.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 05:37 PM
link   
There is no conspiracy.

Sex and drugs aren't anything new and depending on where you are in the world, it is all very much taboo. No matter how much a work of fiction seems like the truth, it is still fiction. It was invented in the author's mind. And as with most all works of fiction, there is truth and history. But just because someone perceives something to be prophetic, doesn't mean that it actually is.

Orwell, Bradbury and Huxley created some of the most famous dystopian novels. If anything resembles these novels or others it is because we have choosen to let it become just that. Though Brave New World is really a utopia, albiet a ironic one.

Regardless, these are works of fiction. Tread lightly for one day, men will treat these and others as if they were the gospels themselves...

And if you happen to read another Huxley book, Island, he says the exact opposite about drugs use. Instead of pacification, they are for enlightenment. Though this is largely attributed to his own experimentation with mescaline a'___'.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by bobafett1972
There is no conspiracy.

Sex and drugs aren't anything new and depending on where you are in the world, it is all very much taboo. No matter how much a work of fiction seems like the truth, it is still fiction. It was invented in the author's mind. And as with most all works of fiction, there is truth and history. But just because someone perceives something to be prophetic, doesn't mean that it actually is.




In case you're not aware, Huxley revealed before a large audience that the society outlined in Brave New World was not a work of fiction, but instead, the Elitists' plans for the future.


He died mysteriously 2 months later.



Also, the Huxley family consists of prominent eugenicists who had close connections with the Elite. The only reason Brave New World is "fiction" is because fiction is often used to bypass censorship.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by thetruth777
Pornography perverts children and teaches them that sex is not taboo; that masturbating is OK.


I am sorry, masturbation is not ok?? I must be on a fast train to hell! I also think that sex is not taboo. I don't think that kids should watch porn. But most kids touches themselves at some point. That's natural, not some CIA mission. Obviously you have never been a kid. I remember when I first realized it felt good down there. I was like 8 or 9. My husband does it too. Seems natural to us!



[edit on 19-4-2008 by i_want_to_believe]



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:18 PM
link   
reply to post by i_want_to_believe
 


There is nothing wrong with masturbation; its just bait for masters; when they take the bait, they cannot become masters, simply due to the fact that the sexual energy is some of the most powerful in regards to spiritual practices. You must have all the "gates" of the body in utter balance and control. But if you're not into that scene, then by all means, have at it. Its your life, live it however you want to. No one should feel bad for who they are or what they do; thats the beauty of free will.


[edit on 4/19/2008 by psychedeliack]



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by thetruth777
He died mysteriously 2 months later.

Also, the Huxley family consists of prominent eugenicists who had close connections with the Elite. The only reason Brave New World is "fiction" is because fiction is often used to bypass censorship.


Are you knowingly posting false information?

Aldous did not die mysteriously. Unless, you call being on your deathbed, unable to speak mysterious? He in fact, could not speak, so, in writing, he asked his wife to dose him with '___'. He died on November 22, 1963, but it was overshadowed by someone elses death.

I know of no eugenicists in his family. His father was a herbalist, most members of his family were naturalists.

Could you please not try and re-write history to suit your threads.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by bobafett1972

Originally posted by thetruth777
He died mysteriously 2 months later.

Also, the Huxley family consists of prominent eugenicists who had close connections with the Elite. The only reason Brave New World is "fiction" is because fiction is often used to bypass censorship.


Are you knowingly posting false information?

Aldous did not die mysteriously. Unless, you call being on your deathbed, unable to speak mysterious? He in fact, could not speak, so, in writing, he asked his wife to dose him with '___'. He died on November 22, 1963, but it was overshadowed by someone elses death.

I know of no eugenicists in his family. His father was a herbalist, most members of his family were naturalists.

Could you please not try and re-write history to suit your threads.



Alex Jones' ENDGAME explored the Huxley line real well...



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by thetruth777
 


Thank you for proving my point.
You quoted the entire post to plug Alex Jones?
So I post facts and you dismiss them and you keep on chugging along posting dubious information for the masses. Isn't that just as bad as your so called elites?



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by psychedeliack
 


"There is nothing wrong with masturbation; its just bait for masters; when they take the bait, they cannot become masters, simply due to the fact that the sexual energy is some of the most powerful in regards to spiritual practices."

So if I beat my meat I can't become a master ?? LOL!!!

A master of what ?

"masturbation
1766, from Mod.L. masturbationem, from L. masturbatus, pp. of masturbari, altered (probably by influence of turbare "to stir up") from *manstuprare, from manu, abl. of manus "hand" (see manual) + stuprare "defile" (oneself), from stuprum "defilement, dishonor," related to stupere "to be stunned, stupefied" (see stupid). Earlier Onanism (q.v.). The verb masturbate is first recorded 1857."

dictionary.reference.com...

Seems to me that it basically means "self defilement" or "to stir up with a hand and stun/ stupify yourself". I prefer the term "playing with my oneself".

Oh and weed is good for thinking. I do a lot of smoking and I have had some epiphanies (for lack of a better word). Of course these epiphanies are just one mans thoughts while high. But I feel enlightened when I have one.

[edit on 19-4-2008 by trilateral]



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join