 |
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 04:20 AM by RabbitChaser
|
IRAQ and IRAN
Adding shame to humiliation
 Since the war in Iraq turned into a disaster, one common argument has been that President Bush's misadventure bears many similarities with US
imperialism in South Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s.
As the North Vietnamese army closed in on Saigon, Ford arranged for 130,000 South Vietnamese, afraid of Communist retribution and retaliation, to be
resettled in the United States.
The current president, unfortunately, has shown no such character in the United States' latest failed war.
Of all the depravity associated with the Bush administration's war in Iraq, nothing has shown this administration's moral bankruptcy and callousness
more than its treatment of those ordinary Iraqis fleeing anarchy for any pocket of civility they can find. Almost three million Iraqis find themselves
internally displaced, many of them women and children. The UN estimates that another 500,000 Iraqis have fled to Jordan, while 1.2 million Iraqis have
crossed over Syria's border for protection.
In March 2007, Bush did acknowledge this crisis indirectly by promising to resettle 12,000 Iraqi refugees inside the United States in fiscal year
2008. The result: only 2,627 Iraqis have found new homes in the US since the end of March. This leaves five months in the fiscal year for the
administration to admit 9,373 more Iraqis to achieve its already stingy goal. At the present rate, the administration won't even reach half its
target by the end of the year.
Gary Ackerman has a theory: "The only answer I can come up with is that President Bush simply doesn't care about the refugees."
US expenditures on humanitarian aid support such an accusation. Since 2003, according to the US state department, the US has given $500m in
humanitarian aid to Iraq - a pittance compared to the more than $500bn spent overall on the Iraq war since 2003. As Human Rights First notes: "That
means that the US spends more on the war in two days than we've contributed to humanitarian assistance for refugees and [internally displaced
persons] in five years."
I'm pretty sure he just doesn't care... about anything except his cronies and his family, in that order mind you. Forced to choose between Cheney or
Laura, who do you think Bush chooses? (Ok -- maybe a bit unfair... what guy wouldn't opt at the chance to lose his wife?)
Seriously though... this is all about letting people suffer and die... depopulation... however it can be achieved.
Swiss bank sued for $500m over Iran links
 ZURICH: US victims of attacks in Israel and their families are suing Swiss bank UBS for 500 million dollars, alleging it financed terrorism by
doing business with Iran, their lawyer told AFP Tuesday.
A UBS spokesman told AFP that the accusations were “without foundation” and that the bank would defend itself in the courts. The bank, which cut
its links with Iran in 2006, was fined 100 million dollars in 2004 for having made currency transfers to Iran, Cuba, Libya and Yugoslavia. UBS is also
one of around 50 multinationals accused of having helped the South African government during the apartheid era, between 1948 and 1994.
Well... that's all anyone is concerned with... money; some more than others  No money there...? Then drag someone else thru the wringer!
How about concerning ourselves with waste (wasted money... wasted lives...) and ending all this mess. Get back to worrying about your own damn
country, whichever that may be. Different cultures and peoples will never see eye to eye, so why strive for this 'Global War' toward a 'Global
Society' and New World Order? Go back to your GD corners and stay there!!
[edit on 5/15/2008 by RabbitChaser]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 05:01 AM by RabbitChaser
|
PALESTINE/ISRAEL
"Lebanon" will simply be included under "Palestine" from now on. No time for comments, but wanted to post these two articles. It's just our
'illustrious' leader pledging out the lives of Americans to other countries (refer back to my final comment in prior post).
Emotional Bush pledges support to Israel
 JERUSALEM (Reuters) - An emotional President George W. Bush pledged that America would remain "Israel's best friend in the world" on Wednesday
during a celebratory visit to Jerusalem to mark the 60th anniversary of the Jewish state.
His host, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, appeared to bring a tear to the president's eye when he called him "a great leader, a great friend".
Olmert also held out hope of reaching a peace with the Palestinians before Bush steps down in January.
Bush condemned "terrorists", including the Iranian allies Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. He said Washington would support those
Palestinians "who don't share" Hamas's vision.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will meet Bush in Egypt on Saturday. Though Abbas, who lost control of Gaza last year to Hamas, would not echo an
Islamist leader who condemned Bush as a "hypocrite", unwelcome in the Holy Land, he and his allies have indicated discomfort with Bush's trip to
Israel.
For Olmert, Bush's visit has provided a distraction from an investigation into his finances that has threatened his survival in office -- and, with
it, Bush's hopes for a deal this year.
Such a ******* joke. Over 1/2 a century of conflict and Bush hopes for a deal in his final year of his Presidency... the ONLY year he has set foot in
Israel/Palestine to attempt to aid talks. For lack of a better analogy... it's kind of like sending the 'dumb' kid to the 'gifted' class, to do
the teaching (well... the 'dumb kid' part is a perfect fit anyway).
US President Bush
offers to help Lebanese Army
 Clashes between Hezbollah supporters and loyalists of the governing coalition in Beirut and other cities erupted after the government acted to
remove Hezbollah's communications network.
The Lebanese government of Prime Minister Fouad Seniora should be helped in strengthening its capacity 'to respond with a military that is
effective,' Bush said.
And since ours has been so effective in Iraq...  Crap... this is only May? At least 8 more months of the Shrubs rhetoric...  Nauseatingly, I
have to add in the "at least" -- I can't say here what I may plan to do, if it turns into more
[edit on 5/15/2008 by RabbitChaser]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 03:08 PM by RabbitChaser
|
Ok -- just giving myself a bump before I crash  I've posted to this thread nearly a month now, but it's usually on the opposite 12th hour from now
and I imagine my thread is usually buried by now. Some may find the reporting a little bias, but there are two sides to every story, and bias story
and we ceratinly don't trust the MSM, do we? Peace.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 04:25 AM by RabbitChaser
|
PALESTINE/ISRAEL
Olmert to hand Bush a weapons wish list
 Olmert's people are leaning, said the sources, toward presenting the visiting president with a list of weapon systems that Israel wants to
purchase or otherwise gain access to. Next month Olmert is scheduled to visit Washington D.C. for 48 hours, expecting to receive Bush's answer on the
possibility of supplying the items on the list.
"We attribute a lot of importance to this visit, because strategic issues of great significance will be discussed," sources from the Prime
Minister's Bureau told Haaretz yesterday.
Sure... we may as well keep funding everyones terrorism
Report: Jerusalem sources believe U.S. could hit Iran this year
 Officials in the Prime Minister's Office said the possibility was discussed in closed talks between Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and U.S. President
George Bush, during the latter's visit to Israel this week.
The officials said that Bush wants to deal with Iran on a root level, to weed out the negative influence aiding militant groups like Hezbollah and
Hamas, the radio said.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, senior officials in Jerusalem said Thursday that Israel is fully satisfied with the results of Bush's visit, including policy on Iran's
nuclear program.
"America stands with you in breaking up terrorist networks and denying the extremists sanctuary. And America stands with you in firmly opposing
Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions. Permitting the world's leading sponsor of terror to possess the world's deadliest weapon would be an unforgivable
betrayal of future generations. For the sake of peace, the world must not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon," the president said.
Bush accused Ahmadinejad of seeking to return the Middle East to the Middle Ages by calling for the destruction of Israel.
Gimme a break  "the destruction of {tiny} Israel" will return the Middle East to "the middle ages"...? Wtf? Ummm... Bush and his cronies
haven't already returned "the Middle East to the Middle Ages" by destroying Iraq...? He certainly views the world from one fine pair of
rose-colored glasses.
Lebanese government capitulates to Hizbullah
 Lebanese Information Minister Ghazi al-Aridi said in a press statement on Wednesday that the US-backed cabinet has cancelled two measures it took
against Hizbullah, which triggered the worst internal fighting in the country since the 1975-90 civil war.
The two measures in question were the army's decision to overturn a government act to reassign the head of Beirut airport security, and the decision
to probe a communications network set up by Hizbullah.
Lebanese media reported that the decision to repeal the acts was instated despite Saudi Arabia's request that the government refrain from ceding to
Hizbullah.
Careful, boys... you wouldn't want to upset the Bush Admin....
Bush: Hezbollah, Hamas, Al-Qaida are all the same
 U.S. President George Bush said during a closed working meeting between the American and Israeli teams that there is no difference between Hamas,
Hezbollah and Al-Qaida.
Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and her U.S. counterpart Condoleezza Rice also took part in the meeting, held at the President's Residence in Jerusalem,
which focused on the latest developments in Syria, Lebanon, Iran and the Gaza Strip.
Bush vowed continued American support for Israel: "The objective of the United States must be, on the one hand, to support our strongest ally and
friend in the Middle East, against the forces of terror you've just described, while at the same time to talk about a hopeful future."
Like I said above... careful... ya' never know who 'The Decider' might decide to add to that list next... it may just be YOU!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 04:40 AM by RabbitChaser
|
IRAQ
Sadr fighters lay down their weapons
 Eyewitness reports said there were minor skirmishes in the area Thursday morning but noted many gunmen could be seen dismantling bombs scattered
in the district. Other reports indicated most of the armed militias vanished from the streets as the terms of the cease-fire brokered between Sadr
loyalists and the Iraqi government during the weekend took hold.
Atta told a news conference that Iraqi authorities established checkpoints where militants could turn in their guns in exchange for government-backed
rewards.
May 15, 2008: 26 Iraqis Killed, 50 Wounded
 The death toll from yesterday's suicide bombing at a funeral in Abu Minasir rose by three dead and eight wounded to 25 killed and 48 wounded. One
witness described the bomber as a crying teenager and noted that the boy's suicide vest appeared to have detonated by remote control, suggesting he
was an unwilling accomplice.
2 Baghdad Attacks
Attributed to Teenagers Kill 11 Others
Clashes in Sadr City left seven dead and 19 wounded. Women and children were among the injured. U.S. forces said they killed two gunmen.
In Jalawla, a roadside bomb killed two policemen and wounded four others.
A blast killed two people in Balad Ruz.
Six policemen were injured during a blast in Khaneqeen.
In Mosul, the Iraqi army arrested the manager of the Ninevah governor's office and the head of the facilities protection services.
Two suspects were detained and a weapons cache was confiscated in Makhmour.
Three doctors were kidnapped near al-Hamra village.
Iran bombarded the Qalaat Daza district, but no casualties were reported. In the past, Iran has targeted PJAK (Partiya Jiyana Azada Kurdistanê) rebel
bases there. They believe the rebels use the bases to stage attacks in Iranian territory.
Two dumped bodies were found near Lake TharThar.
Of course, that is just a small part of a very lengthy list thru the course of this madness.
Iranian embassy employees shot in Baghdad
 An Interior Ministry report said unidentified gunmen in northern Baghdad fired on two SUVs carrying the five employees and driver, who were
transported to an Iraqi hospital.
The Baghdad Operations Command, however, reported that an Iraqi army patrol was shot at and returned fire at the SUVs -- injuring the embassy workers
and their driver, according to the official.
Iran's state-run Islamic Republic News Agency was blaming the United States for the attack.
"U.S. agents carried out terror attacks on Iranian Embassy staff in Baghdad," a bulletin on IRNA's Web site said.
Another message posted eight minutes later read, "Iran holds the U.S. government responsible for terror attacks on Iranian Embassy staff in
Baghdad."
Well... that ought to smooth things over between U.S. and Iran
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 05:12 AM by RabbitChaser
|
IRAN
Blix: West approach to Iran 'hypocritical'
 "The North Koreans have been offered guarantees against any attacks from outside, the Iranians have not been offered this as far as we know, nor
have they been offered diplomatic relations which the North Koreans have been," said the former IAEA chief.
"When you see talks now with the North Korean and the Iranian, they sit there and are told by the US and other, who retain all these weapons, you
should not have all these nuclear weapons, that it is a danger for you, it is not a danger for us, it is for the safety of the world that is very
hypocritical," Blix affirmed.
Gates: U.S. Should Engage Iran With
Incentives, Pressure
 The United States should construct a combination of incentives and pressure to engage Iran, and may have missed earlier opportunities to begin a
useful dialogue with Tehran, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said yesterday.
"We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage . . . and then sit down and talk with them," Gates said. "If there is going to be a
discussion, then they need something, too. We can't go to a discussion and be completely the demander, with them not feeling that they need anything
from us."
The Bush administration has said it will talk with Iran, and consider lifting economic and other sanctions, only if Iran ends a uranium enrichment
program the administration maintains is intended to produce nuclear weapons, a charge Iran denies. Although the U.S. and Iranian ambassadors to
Baghdad met three times last year for discussions on Iraq, Iran has refused to continue that dialogue.
Gates said yesterday that the U.S. military remained "stretched" by deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan, although he said that all service branches
had met their recruitment and retention goals last month. "There is no doubt that . . . we would be very hard-pressed to fight another major
conventional war right now," he said. "But where would we sensibly do that, anyway?"
It's hard to believe, but Gates actaully makes some sense here... seemingly going against the conventional "wisdom" of the Bush Administration. I
wonder how long it will be before D.S. Gates changes his mind or resigns
Maliki Stalls US Plan to Frame Iran
 The government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki refused to endorse US charges of Iranian involvement in arms smuggling to the Mahdi Army, and a
plan to show off a huge collection of Iranian arms captured in and around Karbala had to be called off after it was discovered that none of the arms
were of Iranian origin.
US officials also planned to display Iranian weapons captured in both Basra and Karbala to reporters. That sequence of media events would fill the
airwaves with spectacular news framing Iran as the culprit in Iraq for several days, aimed at breaking down Congressional and public resistance to the
idea that Iranian bases supporting the meddling would have to be attacked.
But events in Iraq diverged from the plan. On May 4, after an Iraqi delegation had returned from meetings in Iran, al-Maliki's spokesman, Ali
al-Dabbagh, said in a news conference that al-Maliki was forming his own Cabinet committee to investigate the US claims. "We want to find tangible
information and not information based on speculation," he said.
Senior US military officials were clearly furious with al-Maliki for backtracking on the issue. "We were blindsided by this," one of them told
Zavis.
Can't fault Maliki for the "want to find tangible information and not information based on speculation," -- especially given the track record of
U.S. 'information' in the past. Seems some folks are stepping up all around this 'plate' to keep things from deteriorating further. Hopefully,
they can make some progress, but I'm not optomistic.
US plot to nail Iran backfires
 The government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki refused to endorse US charges of Iranian involvement in arms smuggling to Shi'ite cleric Muqtada
al-Sadr's Mahdi Army, and a plan to show off a huge collection of Iranian arms captured in and around the central city of Karbala had to be called
off after it was discovered that none of the arms was of Iranian origin.
Another adviser to Maliki, Haider Abadi, told the Los Angeles Times' Alexandra Zavis that Iranian officials had given the delegation evidence
disproving the charges. "For us to be impartial, we have to investigate," Abadi said.
Dabbagh made it clear the government considered the US evidence of Iranian government arms smuggling to be insufficient. "The proof we want is
weapons which are shown to have been made in Iran," Dabbagh said in a separate interview with Reuters. "We want to trace back how they reached
[Iraq], who is using them, where are they getting it."
Anger after apparent U.S. missile strike in
Pakistan
 Eighteen people including foreign militants were killed when two missiles hit a house in the village of Damadola in the Bajaur tribal region,
where Islamist militants have been known to operate, on Wednesday evening, a security official said.
A senior government official said the strike had apparently targeted a mid-level, Arab al Qaeda member, who had been killed.
Neither U.S. nor Pakistani authorities officially confirm U.S. missile attacks on Pakistani territory, which would be an infringement of Pakistani
sovereignty and are unpopular with many Pakistanis who oppose the U.S.-led campaign against terrorism.
Pakistan's Western allies say previous peace pacts merely gave the militants a free hand to regroup and plot violence in Afghanistan and beyond.
The Washington Post reported in March that the United States had escalated air strikes against al Qaeda fighters operating in Pakistan's tribal areas
fearing that support from Islamabad may slip away as Musharraf's power ebbed.
Bin Laden is believed to be hiding somewhere along the border.
I assume this was along the Afhanistan/Pakistan border. You can pretty much bet it was U.S. -- plenty else going on in this world with our armed
forces that we never hear anything about... such as this post about activity in Somalia...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
And another post earlier in this thread...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 5/16/2008 by RabbitChaser]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |

<< 1 2 3 4 >>
|
|
|