America is the most powerful nation EVER!!!, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10    11    12  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 02:19 PM by whaaa
reply to post by jkrog08



Why didn't you address my post about bio chem and even third world countries capabilities?

Bio chem could be brought into any country with permeable borders and released in the jet stream to cover the whole country in days.

Kind of makes all the bombs, navies, stealth bombers etc. obsolete doesn't it. Money spent on armaments doesn't necessarily make for superiority with the new virulent virus's, biological agents being produced in jerkwater labs. Sorry friend, you are stuck in comic book, video game world where splosions rule. Don't you think that paranoid Islamic countries are working over time developing biochem incase of attack by an invading force?

en.wikipedia.org...

It's a brave new world, welcome to the monkey house.






[edit on 19-4-2008 by whaaa]


reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 03:02 PM by applecrumblemaker
One vital point missing is that iran also has allies.

www.vegsource.com...

Do not get to built up about the fact saddam was taken from office so quick, be realistic and realise saddam never had a sophisticated army and never pretended he did, the iraqis fight with faith and courage, saddam never even had an air force etc because of all the restrictions, its all good sitting at home watching the war on tv but when irans airforce are flying 500 deep strapped down with carpet bombs, only then we will all realise war is not a game and should not happen unless vital.


reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 03:11 PM by derfred33
reply to post by jkrog08



the usa can destroy the planet several times, just like russia, france, israel, china, uk and other nuke nations... so what?


reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 03:34 PM by Kr0n0s
reply to post by jimbo999



Pfft, the USofA would've pwnt Rome FTW!!!
As far as "great" Britain goes... I think we've already proven that one, even though the young USA had just learned to walk and "great" Britain was the most powerful country in the world at that time.
Hmm, I wonder if there is a lessen to be learned in there?? Anyone else see the irony here?
BTW, the :lol" between Great and Britain was just me havin fun, I love our cousins across the pond


reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 03:35 PM by Grock
reply to post by jkrog08



Crippling their military does not mean victory. It seems you are looking at this shortsightedly, im trying to get you thinking long term... we STILL havent fully beat Afghanistan OR Iraq, and you say you think we can do it to Iran?

Our 2 theatre military doctrine is not only stretched to its breaking point, its almost thrown out the window.

As a military veteran I applaud your patriotism, but you just arent looking at this realisticly IMO. Just because you defeat their military does not make it a victory (which is PAINFULLY clear in afghanistan and Iraq)... In fact, considering how close we are to disaster, I would almost say that the US is one of the weakest nations ever (certainly the weakest its ever been!).

You DO realize what these wars are doing to our economy (not to mention the ripple effect on the countries around the world) right? Please tell me you have at least studied what it is your saying and not going off half cocked emotionally (like what Bush did to get us into this mess) because your way of thinking is not very mature nor is it good for the US or the rest of the planet.

The lack of gold standard, nations abandoning the petrodollar, strenth of the euro, fall of the dollar, increased world food prices, price of gasoline and the ripple effect at all levels... i could go on and on. WE ARE SITTING DUCKS FOR ECONOMIC COLLAPSE. It wouldnt take very much to go over that edge.

We are on the verge of global disaster and you are encouraging it off the cliff... how you fail to see this is beyond me. It is people like you that got us into this mess in the first place. It will be people like me who have to deal with your misguided mistakes and get us out of it.

I hate to say it but the immaturity level in this thread is staggering.

[edit on 19-4-2008 by Grock]


reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 03:50 PM by West Coast
Originally posted by TheOracle
I said it before I will say it again.
The US can NOT win a conventional war in Iran.


This coming from someone who hardly understands conventional warfare.

The mighty Nazis couldn't take on Russia.


The "mighty Nazis" made a technical error by invading Russia during the winter months.


Technology doesn't win you wars. You could have 100,000 trained and super equipped soldiers but when you have 20 million armed citizen, how are you going to win? Slaughtering everyone?


The US military force is an offensive force by nature, it is not a police force.

Seriously what makes you think you can defeat Iran on its own soil?


I personally do not condone a war with Iran, I think that country will change for the better, eventually.

But if a war were to ever take place, the US wouldn't have to step foot on Iranian soil to completely destroy all Iranian economic, and military infrastructure.

Bombing campaign? Not going to achieve much, and the Iranians are well prepared and have some of the best AA systems.


America has some of the worlds best jamming technology, as well as the best fighter, and stealth aircrafts out there, whats your point?

Expect them to sink a lot of US ships with their sunburn torpedoes.


Speculative nonsense at best.

Expect Russia and China to seriously provide for the Iranians if they don't intervene themselves.


It is a serious possibility, however, I doubt either nation (China and Russia) would want to risk everything over Iran.

There is a time line to attack the US in conventional terms, that time line is fast closing however. By 2020 (the latest) the US military will be deploying FCS, and space forces, along with a plethora of other advanced weapons systems, that will be to much for any single nation to handle. Furthermore, I believe the nuclear option is fast closing for nations outside of the US. the 2020's will be an interesting decade.

China paid for the war in Iraq, even with their financial support the US economy isn't in the best of shape. Imagine what it would be like without their support?


You have been listening to too much of China's propaganda that is making its way into the U.S. media. China is using propaganda to try to control U.S. economic and foreign policies.
Other than that, its just not true, please look at my charts posted on page 6, it clearly shows that the situation is not nearly as dire as you would like to think. Also, Japan is the largest foreign holder of US debt, not China.

Once and for all get in your head that a war isn't about my plane is better than your plane. It's all about politics, money, morale and support at home and the USA would lose that war as soon as it enters it.


I do not agree with the OPs point of view, we are not totally immune, but I do agree that the US is the most economically, and militarily, powerful nation this world has ever bare witnessed to.



reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 04:14 PM by jkrog08
Ok............My point of view is not that the US is always right or should be in Iraq or whatever.............God people,how many times do I have to say this;ALL I AM SAYING IS ECONOMICALLY AND MILITARLY THE USA IS THE MOST POWERFUL NATION ON EARTH!!!!!!Can you please stop twisting my words now?


LOL-Someone said"when you see 500 Iran bombers carpet bombing you will understand"Are you that dilusional to think that the Iranian's would EVER get to the United States?We would shoot down EVETY LAST ON OF THEIR BOMBERS AND FIGHTERS thousands of miles before they even got a whiff of American air.....how stupid can you be?Maybe if you had said China,Russia,and Iran it would be more believable,but still wouldnt happen.If you serioussly think the US is that weak as to let a FOREIGN airforce bomb us on our OWN SOIL,than you are just nuts.

I never said the US has won POLITICALLY...but rather MILITARLY in Iraq and Afghanistan.As I stated before I dont think we should go to war with Iran nor should we have gone to war with Iraq(the way we did)

I dont understand why people that obvioussly know nothing about the US military or any military for that matter are talking about "sunburn"torpedos"You do realize our military is made to fight BOTH China and Russia AT THE SAME TIME,ON BOTH SIDES OF THE GLOBE,right?


For the last time I NEVER SAID NOR CLAIMED THAT THE US IS THE MOST POWERFUL BECAUSE OF ITS NUCLEAR POWER......WE ALL LOSE IN A NUCLEAR WAR.


reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 04:34 PM by strideofthemind
reply to post by jkrog08



And I bet you are an American right? A merica cant win a war in Iraq let alone anywhere else. And it wouldnt just be fighting Iran add Russia and China to the mix!

So no you couldnt defeat Iran

Peace & Love is the only winner


reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 04:42 PM by wdkirk
The USA does not need to occupy Iran to destroy its military and the industry that supports it.

The USA would destroy Iran's defensive installations along with Command/Control/Communication sights. It would establish air superiority. It would then systematically bomb Iran's industry to dust. The US infantry would be at the borders blocking supplies going into and out of IRAN. Other than recon units scouting for military installations, no US infantry should enter Iran. All countries would have trouble attacking any other country defending its home soil. A mile by mile invasion is not required. The US does not need to occupy Iran to destroy its ability to wage war.

In the event a land war is required, a base of operations would be established on Irans coastline with the full brunt of the USA military in the mix. From hear, the ARMY, Marines and airforce would systematically move from city/town to city/town and destroy them. This would be costly in men/women and equipment. Along the way, the USA would remove as many natural resources as possible and take control over Iran's oil fields. The USA's biggest problem will be guerilla warfare tactics used by the Iranians. Small groups of dedicated men, women and children will play havoc with the USA supply lines.

In the end, either way you look at it, the Iranian military will cease to exist and Iran's industrial complex will be in ruins. Its population would be scattered, frightened and angry.

The USA will have suffered staggering losses and costs. The economy would be a mess. Its military will be thinned out. There is the possibility of attacks on US cities with dirty bombs. So, I believe there will be losses on the homefront. With the dollar at a possible all time low because of this, manufactering in the USA would look more profitable than overseas. Inflation would be astronomical.

To passify Russian and China, the US (and Britian if involved) would offer them reconstruction and rebuilding rights so they can help Iran rebuild its infrastructure as well as establish an new government. Let China and Russia "occupy" Iran.

Remember, this is Just and opinion which is just like your rearend. We all have one.




[edit on 19-4-2008 by wdkirk]


reply posted on 19-4-2008 @ 06:26 PM by jkrog08
reply to post by Solarskye



"E Pluribus Unum"..........................................Out of many,ONE.

Great post...........and true,I couldnt have said it better myself.


Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10    11    12  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did NASA "bomb" the moon to hide something?
  Posted 1 days ago with 53 member flags
New Plasma Battery Technology Probably Powering Stealth Sattelites
  Posted 14 days ago with 17 member flags
Is Planet X Approaching After all? How Much Evidence Do We Need?
  Posted 18 days ago with 16 member flags
Nick Pope Interview on ATSLive, Got a Question to ask?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags
Will Planet X be visible during the eclipse on May 20th?
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama and the Card Game Illuminati
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags