posted on Mar, 15 2004 @ 05:10 PM
Given that we are mostly chemistry and electricity in our consciousness, and perhaps something more, we live slightly, ever so slightly in our
perceptions in the past. We are not quite "now," but we are very close. The real "now," is slightly in the future, although Einstein stated that
time-space is integral with consciousness.
One could conceive fairly well that the notion of our being "slightly in the past," is intuitive but also based upon the facts of the matter. It
takes time for the electricity in our nerve impulses to travel a certain distance in the synergy that is consciousness. But that only makes the narrow
band of the here and now so rewarding! Because of the ever so small delay of things we live our lives just that much more patiently and savor it much
more than someone who is just a bit "faster."
So when one makes such a broad statement about the here and now, as "living for the now defeats the purpose of living," is possibly quite true. Are
you living too urgently in the here and now, hence missing the savoring of it all?
If one means to say you live for the anticipation of something, you are still anticipating in the here and now. It is all here and now, even the
remembering. So honestly I am not sure I know what you mean until you define your terms. It also depends upon the quality of the "now," doesn't it?
I am undefeated when I live a quality life in the here and now, otherwise am I missing something?