kshaund

okay, i've really been studying this topic indepth. and although i basically disagree with some of his points, i've since changed my position on a couple of major points.

enki and enlil are both in the bible as jehovah!
at the very least.
and evidence is accumulating that yeshua is enki.
i'm not absolutely certain on that, but it's certainly looking that way.

I find it actually easier to start at the last page, and read it backwards. It makes more sense that way.

I tried reading it from the first page forward, but the lack of connection with the 1000s of b#(%(#t names at the beginning makes you lose interest quick!!!!

Wow. That was a long thread to go through. 34 pages so far. I read both I and II of the Terra papers and found them extremely interesting. I tend to read fast though, so I have a higher chance of missing information.

The first few pages were a little weird, but once you start getting to how we were created it gets a lot more interesting.

This explains a lot of answers, but also raises a few as well.

Here are comments or questions I have about the Terra Papers:

1. It would be nice if there was some sort of timeline involved in the whole process. Book II offers something of a timeline, but it's for the most part a cliffnotes type deal. I would like to see something that goes to a very great detail about the dinosaurs, other species on the planet, and so on and so forth. It also stops with the JFK assassination. What about since then?

2. Perhaps I missed it, but did the Terra Papers explain in any way about ancient lost civilizations we still don't know about today? Such as the Mayans, Atlantis, or even the Bermuda Triangle (not a civilization?) I'm sure I'm leaving numerous ones out.

3. Perhaps some of the original "beasts" made were what we now know as bigfoot or the yeti today... They could have ventured away and never returned and have since been living in unknown forests, or just among us all along (hence the sightings)

4. I think the best way to explain the whole "slaves" situation is to look at it as we're just slaves to the system. The media, electronics, television, movies, papers, you name it, it's controlling us in some way, shape or form.

5. A possible explanation for the energy blanket or whatever it's being called is what we know today as the Van Allen Belt. Anyone agree/disagree?

6. The moon as the deathstar makes a lot of sense. This explains why Nasa and other government organizations don't want pictures of ancient civilizations released to the public. It also explains Mars, Venus, and other planets in our solar system. I guarantee there are ruins of some sort on Venus, Neptune and possible other planets/moons in our solar system. This also explains why the Moon's dark side is always away from us.

These are further questions/comments, but different from above:

1. Before I found this forum, I was always in a kind of "fog". The government and whoever else does such a good job at keeping us brainwashed as to the real truth, that you don't realize how immersed in this fog you really are until you actually open your eyes and see some of the common sense in it all. When you hear others talk of religion, terrorism, energy crisis, and other history, you just shake your head at how ridiculous it all sounds.

2. Has anyone noticed after reading the Terra Papers that whenever doing any sort of research, you always seem to get distracted by phone calls, internet ads, or just normal things that sway you from your further investigation? Perhaps I'm just paranoid, and need mental help...lol.

Well that's all I could think of at the moment, but I'll have more questions later on. I hope Mr. Morning Sky provides further details to our history and other information in the future. I tried going to his website (robertmorningsky.com), but it says it won't be back online until January 1, 2010 for several major announcements. Weird.

Originally posted by undo
kshaund

okay, i've really been studying this topic indepth. and although i basically disagree with some of his points, i've since changed my position on a couple of major points.

enki and enlil are both in the bible as jehovah!
at the very least.
and evidence is accumulating that yeshua is enki.
i'm not absolutely certain on that, but it's certainly looking that way.

I've been out of this loop for a while now - so I'm very rusty on many points - as I recall and generally believe, most if not all religions and their "names" for their leaders/gods, whatever are all mutations linguistically of Ea/Enki and Enlil and Annunaki, etc. Like Ea-Su (Su being "a teacher of") will eventually translate into Ea (a-ah) Su (sue) - Easu - from which comes (I believe) the names/titles of Jesus, Essene, Yaweh, Jehoval.

Originally posted by theprofessionalnyc
I find it actually easier to start at the last page, and read it backwards. It makes more sense that way.

I tried reading it from the first page forward, but the lack of connection with the 1000s of b#(%(#t names at the beginning makes you lose interest quick!!!!

I agree, the names are very difficult to get past when reading - I've read them now a dozen times - the first six times I stumbled and just tried to glean the names and linguistic explanations and focus on the story - it is confusing - but (I think) well worth the read! :-)

Originally posted by undo
kshaund

okay, i've really been studying this topic indepth. and although i basically disagree with some of his points, i've since changed my position on a couple of major points.

enki and enlil are both in the bible as jehovah!
at the very least.
and evidence is accumulating that yeshua is enki.
i'm not absolutely certain on that, but it's certainly looking that way.

I would have to agree with your conclusion that the entity known as Lord God of the old testament is Enki/Enlil.

I would also go further and say that "We" human beings were made in their "likeness", "Image" but, not exactly. In other words, I suspect, they are not what we might call "Human" but are based in a life form that is much much older, and are pre human.

How is this not in Wikipedia?

Any time something [THIS BIG, and widely known about] is absent from there only adds to the contention that it is probably legit, of massive importance, and is being supressed from the masses by the PTB.

Not "Terra Papers" or "Robert Morning Sky" - see for yourself.



[edit on 12/22/2009 by SquirrelNutz]

And, where have the original links disappeared to?

Anyone got another site for the actual papers - the original cited material has vanished. (?)

Ho. Lee. Crap.

This document is an amazing historical record. Thank you for posting.

Originally posted by theprofessionalnyc
I find it actually easier to start at the last page, and read it backwards. It makes more sense that way.

I tried reading it from the first page forward, but the lack of connection with the 1000s of b#(%(#t names at the beginning makes you lose interest quick!!!!

Now, that I've finally read it, I was going to suggest that people start with the second part (or the last 33 pages) Definitely holds you attention easier that way.

Then again, the other way (straight thru) makes it go from sounding like Star Wars fantasy to world history Textbook, and the slow transition is amazing.

Definitely worth a look through.

what happened to robert morning sky?