ATS.MIX: Above Politics Show 12, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 17-4-2008 @ 08:36 PM by ATSMIX

Above Politics Show 12


Martin and Justin pull a few strings to get ATS Member Infinite (a.k.a. Daniel) on his mobile phone. He's located somewhere in Canterbury, England. Daniel spills the beans on British Republicanism, which means he's not in favor of keeping the Monarchy. Daniel makes his predictions for the U.S. Presidential race. Martin and Daniel debate the merits PM Gordon Brown, and the timing of his visit to America. Justin asks about the difference between chips, crisps, cakes and biscuits. ATS Member Xpert11 wins this week's trivia challenge as Daniel dishes dirt on U.K. politics. Another scoop for you, on The Above Politics Show!



These are some of the topics touched on in today's show

Author: Infinite
Title: Bank of England to take on banks' loans to help mortgage market
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Author: Infinite
Title: Fears emerge over Russia's oil output
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Author: Infinite
Title: Silvio Berlusconi ahead in Italian exit polls
www.abovetopsecret.com...

PLEASE POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS SHOW THREAD ONLY!




length: 38:14
file: atsmix_2902.mp3
size: 13447k
feed: atsmix

To DOWNLOAD This Program, Put Your Mouse Cursor Over the BLUE SHOW FILE NAME, Then RIGHT CLICK. Slide The Cursor Down To SAVE TARGET AS And Then CLICK .... Now Just Decide WHERE You Want To Download The File To And CLICK SAVE. You Might Also Consider SUBSCRIBING To The Shows Through iTunes Where They Are Downloaded To Your computer Automatically.


[edit on 4/17/2008 by Dave Rabbit]



reply posted on 18-4-2008 @ 05:09 AM by infinite
reply to post by xpert11



Thank you for your question btw

It started a very interesting debate


reply posted on 18-4-2008 @ 06:50 AM by infinite
reply to post by xpert11



Yes it is. I believe the "presidental" style operated under Thatcher, as the Monarchy became less important, some Prime Ministers (mainly Blair and Thatcher) acted like a President than a Prime Minister.


reply posted on 18-4-2008 @ 09:25 PM by xpert11
reply to post by infinite



Interesting I will have to consider your reply when I give thought to the matter of NZ elections becoming more presidential.

The UK could always elect the monarchy that way we would both be happy.


reply posted on 20-4-2008 @ 10:19 AM by Freedom ERP
reply to post by infinite



Isn't electing the monarchy the same as electing a president as head of State? I am one of the 75% (according to infinite figures) that either support the current way or have not expressed a view. Why the need to make all these changes. What difference would I see if there was a president? As you stated in the show, infinte, the monarchy has not refused to sign an act into law since Queen Anne.

In the US, President Bush has refused to sign acts into law?? And one would suspect that if the Queen was not happy to sign an act, she would make the PM aware as they meet weekly. We have second chamber to act as a review process for the Commons.

Other than huge expense, what do we gain by changing?


reply posted on 21-4-2008 @ 02:31 PM by Ste2652
reply to post by infinite



I'm not sure whether that's a good or a bad thing

MI6 do eavesdrop on European meetings, and they bugged the French Embassy when de Gaulle was considering British membership to the EEC. The UK and the EU haven't always been the best of friends.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^