I was of the opinion that Arthur Leigh Allen was the killer as well. I also believed he had an accomplice that donated his penmanship to the
letters.
The only reason I believed this was because of Robert Graysmith's books;
Zodiac and
Zodiac Unmasked. Graysmith provided very convincing
evidence that seemed to condemn Allen.
When I discovered that Graysmith had probably done more harm to the case than good, I was shocked and disappointed.
Graysmith was so sure that his man, "Bob Hall Starr" (Allen) was guilty, he didn't let a little thing like the truth get in the way.
Most serious ZODIAC researchers dismiss Graysmith's evidence out of hand. After reading through this site, I too was convinced that Allen was not the
ZODIAC Killer.
Some snippets:
The author's efforts to implicate his suspect continued in the years since the publication of ZODIAC. Graysmith spread an unsubstantiated rumor
that Allen had received a speeding ticket near the scene of Zodiac's Lake Berryessa attack. This rumor eventually appeared as a verified fact in a
book written by former FBI profiler John Douglas.
Graysmith claims in one quick sentence, "Sherwood Morrill confirmed my theory." (pg. 219). Yet he states that in 1981 he "dropped in on
Sherwood Morrill "to compare handwriting of a suspect with the Zodiac's (Zodiac, pg. 298, paperback edition). If Morrill actually believed that
Graysmith's projector theory was true, he would not continue to exclude or include suspects based on their handwriting. Graysmith seems oblivious to
this blatant contradiction.
Official documents and media interviews, as well as the expert's family, demonstrate that Morrill's opinions never changed throughout his many years
on the case. Until his death, Morrill stated that he was certain the Zodiac used his normal handwriting when writing the letters and the expert was
unwavering in his belief that he could identify the killer using little more than a bank deposit slip.
Graysmith also attempted to revise Vallejo geography on page 425 of Zodiac Unmasked. The author claimed to have discovered a "hidden road" that
led him "in a dead straight line" from the crime scenes to Allen's home. Graysmith claimed the road was so well hidden that he had to make an
"abrupt turn" to make this sensational discovery.
In June of 2003, several Zodiac researchers drove the streets of Vallejo in an attempt to locate the road Graysmith described but were unable to do so
using the information provided in the book. Telephone requests for assistance from the author went unanswered. Further research proved that
Graysmith's phantom road does not appear on maps from the 1960s or today, and, in fact, never existed.
On page 200 of Zodiac Unmasked, Graysmith presents a drawing he claims Karen Allen produced while under hypnosis using "automatic writing." The
drawing allegedly proves that Allen was in possession of Zodiac-like codes long before the killer's codes appeared in the newspapers. Karen Allen was
never hypnotized, and she never produced the drawing shown in Graysmith's book.
Zodiac
Killer Facts
I too believe that Gareth Penn was obsessed with the case, maybe even more than Graysmith.
ipsedixit is so very correct. These cyphers that Farmer has cracked go beyond the realm of coincidence. They also go beyond the machinations of some
crack-pot that is creating evidence to implicate himself. If Farmer is correct, and he provides compelling evidence, he is showing us the inner
workings of a person that is so sublime and brilliant as to be terrifying. A person that couldn't help but brag of his crimes in some way.
Times 17 gave us insight, for the first time, into the radian theory, and a lot of red herrings too.
The radian theory is interesting but it is flawed. If we look at a simplified view of these radians we get a more convincing picture.
Another interesting point about radians that arguably strengthens this position is the following. The vast majority of the time one uses radians
as a unit of measure, the angles involved are a fraction (possibly improper) of π, e.g. π/6, π/4, π/3, π/2, π, etc. Rarely does one encounter
whole-number multiples of one radian.
Having said that, the choice of the term radians may possibly have been a carefully calculated move on the part of the Zodiac. Although it's not
clear whether the Zodiac deserves credit, just look at the result of him having used the term radians instead of degrees. Since Penn’s discovery in
1980, there has been a significant focus on the arguably unfamiliar unit. This clearly has diverted time, effort and focus away from other aspects of
the case, including angles considered unrelated to radians. Numerous people have spent substantial amounts of time looking for one-radian angles
throughout the geographic details of the case.
Two New Theories Regarding the Zodiac
Case
[edit on 20/4/2008 by Beelzebubba]