911 - CNN Video Fakery - Please help with analysis.

Hi folks,

I was really impressed with the followup on my GAALT thread, and the continuing research.

So, I thought I would post this page to get follow up opinions. Please help with my analysis and see if you agree or disagree and please post your reasons why or why not.

Please read the page and follow the links for the full review.

I appreciate all help as well as criticism. If you criticize, please be kind, that's all I ask.

www.freedomdomain.com...

anyone?
Any input?
Anything?

I don't believe you will get much response to this thread. Do a little searching of ATS and you will fund multiple threads deailing with the "no plane" theory and "tv trickery". Any theory that states there were no planes that crashed into the buildings on 9/11 is garbage in my opinion....and the opinion of many other's here on ATS and elsewhere.

It's a shame there's no debate over this side of the puzzle, I really wish I'd examined the evidence with more scrutiny when the attacks first took place but unfortunately i didn't ask enough questions.

Thanks Conx for the great post and for anyone else who reads this i would Highly recommend at least having a look at the site (the stills showing the plane entering from different directions are pretty interesting)

-twisted

I appreciate all help as well as criticism. If you criticize, please be kind, that's all I ask.

www.freedomdomain.com...

Thanks for posting what I see as a quite comprehensive and level-headed look at a lot of the oddities one can find in the videos broadcast on that day.

Last year or so, I reviewed several of the vids posted on youtube regarding the no plane theory and was sold on it; I even copy-posted a video on youtube and continue to get a lot of angry comments on it.

Anyway, it looks like you've covered all the key points that I saw (nose out, angle discrepencies), plus others (plane shape differences, fuselage roll discrepencies). Good work on covering this so thoroughly.

Also, just to mention I just came across this site after watching Project Camelot's recent interview of John Lear, in part 1 of which he says the planes were holograms projected from a different plane (the "white plane" I wonder??)

- Rob

Originally posted by thunderrabbit

I appreciate all help as well as criticism. If you criticize, please be kind, that's all I ask.

www.freedomdomain.com...

Thanks for posting what I see as a quite comprehensive and level-headed look at a lot of the oddities one can find in the videos broadcast on that day.

Last year or so, I reviewed several of the vids posted on youtube regarding the no plane theory and was sold on it; I even copy-posted a video on youtube and continue to get a lot of angry comments on it.

Anyway, it looks like you've covered all the key points that I saw (nose out, angle discrepencies), plus others (plane shape differences, fuselage roll discrepencies). Good work on covering this so thoroughly.

Also, just to mention I just came across this site after watching Project Camelot's recent interview of John Lear, in part 1 of which he says the planes were holograms projected from a different plane (the "white plane" I wonder??)

- Rob

Yes,

BUMP

John Lear just went on film on Project Camelot saying they used HOLOGRAMS AND CGI FAKERY.....

John Lear is an aviation EXPERT, and claims that there is NO WAY planes flew into the trade centers.

Thanks for the post Rob,