It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EnlighteneSoul
Tibet has been part of China for centuries before Amerigo Vespucci was even born.
Originally posted by budski
You do know which century we are in yes?
OF COURSE EXECUTING MINORS IS INHUMANE - are you a savage?
You do understand the meaning of the word "civilized"?
Originally posted by EnlighteneSoul
Tibet has been part of China for centuries before Amerigo Vespucci was even born.
Originally posted by lordwedggie
As a native Chinese posting this from China I suggest a different point of view: let's forget about what the lama and his monks want for a moment (they are exiled rulers from a theocracy state), and try to picture want would the common people want?
If it was you, would you:
1. Been born either into slavery or practice religion for life... or:
2. At least have a choice, even if under the rule of the red flag.
I know two Tibetans in Beijing, one owns a bar in one of the most popular bar streets, and the other is in an underground rockbands. The above question is what the rocker asked me after I raised the question. And 'you are ignorant' was what he added to finish his sentence.
Originally posted by lordwedggie
Originally posted by IAF101
Originally posted by EnlighteneSoul
Tibet has been part of China for centuries before Amerigo Vespucci was even born.
So what ? China was also part of Genghis Khan's empire. Are the comies going to hand over their power to the guys in Ulan Batar ??
No but Mongolia was part of the Republic of China (now running the rogue province of Taiwan) and Inner-Mongolia is part of the People's Republic of China. Mongolia was split in half after WWII by the majors, mostly the soviets to create a strategic buffer or something like that.
Originally posted by lordwedggie
Today, the official teachings of the PRC says Genghis Khan is 'Chinese'. His empire the Yuan Dynasty is considered one of the Chinese Dynasties. This is actually very easy to understand: the concept of 'Chinese' did not exist until the 1900's when the last empire collapsed. Chinese is NOT a nationality, it's a concept that means 'the people who ruled the land of China'.
Originally posted by lordwedggie
Even more interesting is that the Han Chinese is not a nationality, it's also a concept. Han means 'The people who was part of the Han Empire' which existed some 2200 years ago (same time as Rome), it was established after 1000 years of continuous warfare in Asia that united what was once hundreds of independent states, many with unique nationalities (The warring states period). Still more interesting, is for a time Koreans were part of the Han Chinese 'nationality', as it was an province of the Han.
Originally posted by lordwedggie
The history of Asia is extremely long and complex, but essentially works the same as Europe: government and religions try to rule, states fight for power. The biggest difference... well, imagine if Rome united the whole of Europe and instead of separating the Romans from the Barbarians they bought the people under one written language and one law with a centralized government, we would probably have a European country the size of China, the people of this country called the Euro or some other name, but essentially they would still be the French the British and the Germans (though if such empire did exist inter-nation-province marriage will blur the lines after a few hundred years).