I guess all that money they spend on scientific research is a total waste...

The cure for cancer turns out to be a 10 minute dose of Jenna Jameson

8 wanks a day keeps the doctor away....

up next masturbation in public because of trying to get your dose of anti cancer.

Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy

Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck

Originally posted by Jeff Riff
Looks I have been preventing cancer since I was 13...
flippin sweet

Ummm... one small problem, though. I have prostate cancer, and by all accounts, then, I oughtn't.

I am really sorry to hear that man. I hope we develope some means of a cure for you and the others

Thanks for the good thoughts. There are cures...I'm doing standard and alternative therapies, and even on the conventional one the cure rate at early onset is 95% at 10 years. Gotta get it early, though. But by all means, lads..keep on keepin'on.

Then I should be cancer free for the next hundred years.

Hmmm, tough choice...

Glasses & hairy palms, or cancer?

Aww, to heck with it. I've worked my way up to glasses already; so why stop now!

Lasik & electrolysis here I come!!!

Did they happen to publish any information about the maximum "safe dosage"?

I'm placing myself on a stiff regimen immediately but don't want to over-medicate.

On the other hand , don't you risk a mineral loss if you do it too much or eat not enough meat?

I always think that its good for a man to get rid of the energy, as that energy built up, can cause problems.

I am not saying whether the study is true, but i agree that build up of that energy and no release is bad for males, and your health.

Originally posted by SystemiK
I'm placing myself on a stiff regimen immediately

loooool... thats a good one.

you guys are hilarious.

But seriously: There does seem to be a correlation between suppression of sex and prostate cancer. Not with everyone...but the stats speak for themselves.


(Thanks Master W for this news)

[edit on 18-4-2008 by Skyfloating]

Originally posted by 44soulslayer
I guess all that money they spend on scientific research is a total waste...

The cure for cancer turns out to be a 10 minute dose of Jenna Jameson

Serioulsy though:

9 times out of 10 "having a good time" is more effective than the junk prescribed by pharmaceutical companies.

Originally posted by Skyfloating 9 times out of 10 "having a good time" is more effective than the junk prescribed by pharmaceutical companies.

Being in the middle of the process, knowing a bunch of people in varying degrees of the same boat, I'd take issue with that. I don't think the sun shines outta Big Pharma's butt, but there's a lot of people alive and kicking strictly because of their meds...I'm sure you can think of a few yourself.

But a thread like this is just achin' for a punchline, and I'm not gonna be the threadkiller this time out.

Is this real? I haven't seen this on Fox..I wonder if somebody's trying to jerk us around?

I know one thing.. it would be just my luck to be one of the control subjects that are told, "ok, no wacking for a year",

[edit on 18-4-2008 by RUFFREADY]

Another perfectly good excuse for the MRS!!!

Well, i can't find the factoid link immediately,

but there is a lack of cancer with people that are pre-disposed to having warts.
There is also evidence that people that have contracted herpes-simplex
do not get life shortning cancer either.


maybe we can find enough statistics to show that bubble gum chewers
that swallow their gum, contract cancer more often than the population at large...


engaging in a hedonist pleasure does not necessarily reduce cancer,,,
as those self-satisifiers probably met their end before any cancer
had the time to become fatal.