Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Masturbation 'cuts cancer risk'

page: 2
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 17 2008 @ 06:21 PM
link   
I guess all that money they spend on scientific research is a total waste...

The cure for cancer turns out to be a 10 minute dose of Jenna Jameson




posted on Apr, 17 2008 @ 06:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by WalkOn
 


Not sure how french kissing correlates to masturbation, but I am sure I went to the wrong school for 6th grade..

sooo you never got a hard on that had to be delt with after getting mugged by 2-3 girls at the same time around your first time?



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 08:18 AM
link   
8 wanks a day keeps the doctor away....

up next masturbation in public because of trying to get your dose of anti cancer.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 08:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy

Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck

Originally posted by Jeff Riff
Looks I have been preventing cancer since I was 13...
flippin sweet
Ummm... one small problem, though. I have prostate cancer, and by all accounts, then, I oughtn't.
I am really sorry to hear that man. I hope we develope some means of a cure for you and the others


Thanks for the good thoughts. There are cures...I'm doing standard and alternative therapies, and even on the conventional one the cure rate at early onset is 95% at 10 years. Gotta get it early, though. But by all means, lads..keep on keepin'on.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 09:12 AM
link   
Thanks for the heads up.
But, there's a lot more to keeping your pipes clean than that. Certain foods and oils can either be a blessing or a curse.

Does this also apply to women folk or just another note on the honey do list? I've heard somewhere that women have a prostate type of gland also; where they refer to the G-spot? I believe this has something more to do with childbirth though. I've read recently that your body needs to have a certain ph balance that's more alkaline to avoid cancer also.

www.healthrecipes.com...



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 09:39 AM
link   


Then I should be cancer free for the next hundred years.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 09:51 AM
link   
Hmmm, tough choice...

Glasses & hairy palms, or cancer?

Aww, to heck with it. I've worked my way up to glasses already; so why stop now!

Lasik & electrolysis here I come!!!



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 10:05 AM
link   
Did they happen to publish any information about the maximum "safe dosage"?

I'm placing myself on a stiff regimen immediately but don't want to over-medicate.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 10:47 AM
link   
On the other hand , don't you risk a mineral loss if you do it too much or eat not enough meat?



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 10:51 AM
link   
I always think that its good for a man to get rid of the energy, as that energy built up, can cause problems.

I am not saying whether the study is true, but i agree that build up of that energy and no release is bad for males, and your health.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 12:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by SystemiK
I'm placing myself on a stiff regimen immediately


loooool... thats a good one.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 12:50 PM
link   
you guys are hilarious.

But seriously: There does seem to be a correlation between suppression of sex and prostate cancer. Not with everyone...but the stats speak for themselves.


(Thanks Master W for this news)

[edit on 18-4-2008 by Skyfloating]



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 01:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by 44soulslayer
I guess all that money they spend on scientific research is a total waste...

The cure for cancer turns out to be a 10 minute dose of Jenna Jameson


Serioulsy though:

9 times out of 10 "having a good time" is more effective than the junk prescribed by pharmaceutical companies.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 02:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Skyfloating 9 times out of 10 "having a good time" is more effective than the junk prescribed by pharmaceutical companies.


Being in the middle of the process, knowing a bunch of people in varying degrees of the same boat, I'd take issue with that. I don't think the sun shines outta Big Pharma's butt, but there's a lot of people alive and kicking strictly because of their meds...I'm sure you can think of a few yourself.

But a thread like this is just achin' for a punchline, and I'm not gonna be the threadkiller this time out.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 02:06 PM
link   
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
 


alright. fair enough.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 02:52 PM
link   
Is this real? I haven't seen this on Fox..I wonder if somebody's trying to jerk us around?

I know one thing.. it would be just my luck to be one of the control subjects that are told, "ok, no wacking for a year",


[edit on 18-4-2008 by RUFFREADY]



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 03:49 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 03:53 PM
link   
Another perfectly good excuse for the MRS!!!



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 06:27 PM
link   
Well, i can't find the factoid link immediately,

but there is a lack of cancer with people that are pre-disposed to having warts.
There is also evidence that people that have contracted herpes-simplex
do not get life shortning cancer either.


maybe we can find enough statistics to show that bubble gum chewers
that swallow their gum, contract cancer more often than the population at large...


engaging in a hedonist pleasure does not necessarily reduce cancer,,,
as those self-satisifiers probably met their end before any cancer
had the time to become fatal.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 07:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Skyfloating
 


In that case, should be not be seriously worried for the health of monks around the world!?






top topics



 
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join