It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Could this be the Best UFO Footage Ever? (Clear Video of UFO)

page: 9
28
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 12:30 PM
link   
Any time VisionQuest... alternative views besides fake make me think.

Don't be a rejecting. You might deny reality.

So what have we learned today.

Well clouds and UFOs can go together even after two days.

A UV meter can come in handy as evidence, well not even with sworn
statement for some ATS leerkers I suppose.

And a static meter can be used on the same day and perhaps up to
two days later.

The Illuminati most likely own the UFO will never divulge its secrets
so don't expect any breakthroughs soon.

UFOs are not fake and neither is the Illuminati.




posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 12:40 PM
link   
reply to post by ignorant_ape
 


Thats exactly how the UFO works. Its on a string.

A long string of electrons holding up the craft.

Is been done with models, recognized by authority as TT Brown's method
but its done with Tesla's equipment, so I think Tesla knew what he was doing.
So here again we get the bull that deny Tesla.

What is Tesla, the boggy man to the Illuminati?
Deny Tesla, deny reality.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 12:53 PM
link   
reply to post by tjsteeler
 



Well that right their seems highly suspect...should we continue w/ this guy then?

Good Day
Skept!cal



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 02:21 PM
link   
To me...the relation of the distance from the sky to the house appears as though it would be really small? I agree with some one who said that it seems like a remote control type of object. The space relationship just appears off?? And...sorry about the post earlier...he said he was feeding the dogs..i read incorrectly.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 02:31 PM
link   
Okay, let's see here. We got a fuzzy, shaky, overexposed video, and a story from some guy. And that's about it.

Yep, I'm in ATS's Aliens & UFOs forum, all right.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 04:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Coward
reply to post by Palasheea
 



Lol


I don't want to get banned by him for not letting him enjoy his dessert.



Just kidding! Anyway, I have been waiting for this videographer for a while now. I will get back on in a little bit. If he does not contact me tonight I will harass him the whole day tomorrow so that he shows up.


[edit on 17-4-2008 by The Coward]


Then I think the videographer should never contact you again ever.
What's the matter with you ? Why would you harass him ? Do you know
the meaning of the word harassment ? Are you some kind of military
agent or something to harass this person who is speaking to you in
good will ? How can you say in a public forum that you you will harass
someone just to get what you want, that's not fair and indecent.

Maybe I should email this person to alert him not to talk to anybody and
just enjoy his own fortunate experience, how's that ? Maybe you should
think twice before saying such words like harassment.

In any case I can see you retired yourself The Coward from your own
thread and gave free pass to the debunking armada as usual. Well
it seems your own thread is the one that's been disected here and not
the video posted on YouTube. Sure the same old fashioned phrases
that amateur debunkers use all the time: remote control model, CGI,
etc. but only words and zero evidence to support their allegations.

I have'nt seen here a single good argument or evidence to debunk this
case and the skeptic armada is having a field day exterminating the
once promising thread about that UFO filmed in Texas. The fact is
the incident is still a mystery and it will require a proper investigation
with the actual witness in the actual location to establish what did happen
that day.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 04:56 PM
link   
reply to post by free_spirit
 


MR. Free_spirit Who the F$%&* made you Captain!? You need to chill out and stop being hostile against me. What the hell is the matter with You? Are you obsessed or something? The term is a figure of speech... shows how much you know! Go ahead and ask the videographer himself and he will tell you how I invited him respectfully. To be honest, I have not had a chance to even email him today, because I had so much work to do. What is your problem anyway? What i said about Springer banning me for disrupting his dessert was also in good fun, what did you really think i meant it too?

Chill out, I too want to Q & A to the original videographer, believe me, I would also like to verify this video so that we can finally rub it in the Skeptics faces. But hey, if it's fake, big deal, there will be others right? So don't take this too personal cause if it is fake it's simply gonna make you look foolish.


Anyway, I am checking my youtube account and the videographer has sent me 4 new messages. Will get to you guys in just a bit.




[edit on 18-4-2008 by The Coward]



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 05:24 PM
link   
Ok... I have taken the time to read the youtube emails sent to me by the Videographer and they are as follows:

youtube Message:




also, many viewers are posting remarks on one of my videos that ATS has debunked my UFO footage(s)...I KNOW FOR SURE ATS. holds a very professional approach to any and all UFO postings.


youtube Message:


THANKS, I have at this time designated JAIME MAUSSAN to conduct a complete and fair investigation unto this matter. I will let him and his investigative team get in touch with you guys for more follow ups. In the meantime, let me finish the interview and video analysis with them first.


youtube Message:



Due to the high risk of my video and material ending up in the wrong hands, JAIME MAUSSAN has sent a team of investigators to conduct a very professional investigation. I will cease any and all communication and authorization to anyone effective immediatley! Only JAIME MAUSSAN and his investigative team will have official possesion and access to my videos as well as any interviews. I thank you for your understanding.


youtube Message:



YOU ARE RIGHT many skeptics and spies out there trying to degrade my footage. But boy do I have a surprise! I am one week away from declaring this footage world wide! It is far more real than the ALIEN AUTOPSY and HAITI UFO, even MARK LAZAR will become a BELIEVER like you all at ATS!!


Ok... so there you have it! Mr. Jaime Maussan has done it again!! Screwed us all claiming all rights to the videos. Any of you surprised?



P.S. Yesterday night I invited the Videographer to chat with us here and he had sai it was Ok. Now he wrote and said this about Jaime Maussan? Don't know what gives....

Will contact him again (hold your temper Free_Spirit I won’t “harass” him I swear) to see if he at least passes around to chat with us a while. Whish me luck!!




[edit on 18-4-2008 by The Coward]



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 07:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Palasheea


Um... IchiNiSan, when you see these things in person, yes, many times one does become obsessed with the UFO topic -- just in case you're wondering.


Many of us here have seen them. That's why we're here in this forum.


Well don't get me wrong, I am obsessed with UFO too. It is just that too often it is so coincidental and lucky for certain true believers to film a UFO in his backyarden
Makes my spider sense tingling, if it is these kinds of people telling me they saw a UFO.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 07:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by tjsteeler
Yeah, it's a hoax. The owner of the video on Youtube already banned me for questioning it.

It's odd that he has two videos of UFOs within 48 hours in the same exact area


I emailed the guy and questioned him also. I asked him straight up if it was a
hoax. He didn't ban me. He actually emailed me back. He claims the video is
real, and that Ufologist...Jaime M(?) picked up the original film and took it with
him.

The second video is just of a cloud, not a UFO.

I'm in no way defending him. I have no judgment either way. I wanted to ask
him a few questions to see if I could get a different response. I do,
however, have concerns about the length of the footage. Maybe we will get some answers. If not, oh well. On to the next one. I have other things to get uptight about.



posted on Apr, 18 2008 @ 10:05 PM
link   
Another white orb for the belt notch. Just out back with the dogs, digging the full moon and 75 degree temps. Saw a largish white orb streaking down 45 degrees due south. It was cooking. Percieved speed, a couple thousand mph at least. No sound, no report of it hitting ground. 10:50 pm est, ssw travel. About a golf ball in size held at arms length.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 01:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by ST SIR 86
reply to post by internos
 


Do you think that aliens know the level of technology in our mobile/camera phones, if so this could explain why they seem to always be just out of focus.

And do you think digital filming was introduced to mobile/cameras to make it easier for the powers to be to debunk sensitive issues as CGI's ?


This is the kind of "logic" that makes me shudder. So what you're saying is, the reason for the blurry videos is that the aliens "know the level of technology in our mobile/camera phones" so they are deliberately altering their own appearance, staying out of focus just a bit? huh? Please. And what if we see a clearer video? Does that mean the aliens in that case are a bit behind in their technology? Come on man. I'm just as interested in finding out more about the UFO phenomenon, but let's keep it real. This video is silly. Someone mentioned that they thought it was a good thing that the guy isn't talking. I call BS on that. What normal person wouldn't be talking like crazy while watching this bizarre event unfolding. This guy's as quiet as a kitten while a freakin' UFO is flying over his head. So much for his dog feeding routine. Suddenly he sees a UFO over his house and he's relaxing and quietly taping it. On a very basic psychological level, he would be narrating the situation, probably in a very animated manner. Also, it's very helpful that his battery died right at the end, so that he didn't have to do the extra work to animate the craft "flying away" at the end. Oh, and next time, you may want to plug that thing in before you go to sleep, so that the battery won't run out first thing in the morning. hoax.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 03:32 AM
link   
Neat footage. Who cares if its a hoax?

Thoughts make reality, not the other way around. The proof crowd says the exact opposite, but they pin themselves into a tiny corner of being simple machines responding to stimuli in that case. There isn't much you could call time at the quantum level, at wich everypart of your brain exsists, thus you think before after and during what happens, so our thoughts preceed reality by at least 6 seconds, as shown an extensive study.

If you create the mental space for this to be real, geuss what, it is real. Even if this footage turns out to be fake, knowing about the alien reality, it has happened somewhere, and this footage truely did happen somewhere in the mulit-verse anyway, so what IS a fake really? Anything that can happen is now happening somewhere in the multi-verse. Talking about proof is silly in the multi-verse, and even in our universe we have Von Hisenberg's uncertinty wich negates any proof anyway.

Out-tumble THOSE mental gymnastics!


@The Coward- I hope you do blow my mind. Its been awhile!
My reality has become far to flexible and nebulaus to resist an explosive force, unlike clouds wich hold in cuncusion waves,



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 05:43 AM
link   
reply to post by The Coward
 


well i must say this looks pretty descent i mean u can notice some lights rotating on the bottom of it but yes why not keep recording and also i would like to add the footage of the UFO filmed in the helicopter that was hanging around th twin towers is actually THE BEST footage i have ever seen even right up to the sonic boom when it speeds off past the helicopter window.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:36 AM
link   
This is the best footage of a rain cap or spark arrestor that I have seen.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:45 AM
link   
I don't think I have ever seen the sky so white like it is in that video.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 06:49 AM
link   
Nice piece of film. Could be faked I suppose but there's really no need to make fake footage when there are so many real UFOS flying around. There were a couple pics of an identical craft floating around a few years ago that were taken in Scotland somewhere. It also looks quite similar to the UFO I saw in Fife, Scotland in March 2004. The difference was my object had a turned up flange at each side and the whole underneath had a pink-red flashing light that lit up the air around it. Lovely sunny day it was and so close I could have hit it with a rock. Definitely not CGI, unless there's a technology that can make things appear soild in real life, out of thin air. Hmm. Maybe there is....



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 07:02 AM
link   
I arrived a little late on this thread


A few notes to bare in mind on the Video.

Important or not,

I see alot of you saying this was filmed on a cellphone/digital video

it was not

The Video Was filmed on a Hi-8 tape camera , (notice the tracking at the bottom of the video, like when you record a VHS video.)

so this is not a digital Video,

If it was fake then he has Done all this digitally and then Exported it to tape to "dirty" up the video which would hide details and at the same time make it look more convincing as tape footage looks more untamperd with.

on the other hand this could be real and was just shot on tape and recorded onto the computer using a video capture hardware/software.

a lot of you have already touched upon notes that I would agree with like the dimond lens blur on the lights,

that is typical of a cerl zeis lens systen used on most camcorders tape and digital my sony DV cam and my sony hi-8 cam both have dimond shaped irisi's.

so the lights on there are really hard to judge exactly what they are..holes? or lights? could be eaither.


the over exposure does not strike me as "post processed" depending on camera settings, and sky conditions, the sky will be over exposed when therer are dark buildings trees on the same field of veiw.


Dispite all this (and I am one who have seen a craft and truley beleive E.T. craft regually visit us)

this looks fake to me, but I just can't seem to put words to why that is.
it dosent look CGI

it looks like a nuts and bolts model closer than you think

an that same note. I'm going to go now and experoment with my camcorders as

****AND TAKE NOTE OF THIS****

I'm 90% shure that the dimond lenns bluring of small bright light points only happends on very close subjects,

I recently made a Video project for a music video comepatition and I was filming led lights close up and changing the focus and they were all dimond shape.. but this never happends on say... stars or the moon when the focus goes out.. I will experoment .




x



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 08:09 AM
link   
Is it just me , or is the idea of someone being able to capture an image of a extra terrestrial craft on a simple vidicam slightly odd? I mean these things would have to have some pretty exotic energies involved with thier locomotion wouldnt you think ? I would expect at least SOME interferance of either the sound or the picture . Although Im not a skeptic on the subject of UFO I do think that the majority of available footage is faked , simply because there is no interferance of any kind , which just doesnt hold wieght when you are talking about taking pictures of an interstellar craft which must carry some sort of lightspeed propulsion system , and therefore pack out at least a few interesting energy signatures.
Of course , it may be that where ever the craft came from , it has shielded all its energy run off from external observation, or it may give of energy that we havent the means to record, but its still confusing to me.



posted on Apr, 19 2008 @ 08:09 AM
link   
Is it just me , or is the idea of someone being able to capture an image of a extra terrestrial craft on a simple vidicam slightly odd? I mean these things would have to have some pretty exotic energies involved with thier locomotion wouldnt you think ? I would expect at least SOME interferance of either the sound or the picture . Although Im not a skeptic on the subject of UFO I do think that the majority of available footage is faked , simply because there is no interferance of any kind , which just doesnt hold wieght when you are talking about taking pictures of an interstellar craft which must carry some sort of lightspeed propulsion system , and therefore pack out at least a few interesting energy signatures.
Of course , it may be that where ever the craft came from , it has shielded all its energy run off from external observation, or it may give of energy that we havent the means to record, but its still confusing to me.



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join