Could this be the Best UFO Footage Ever? (Clear Video of UFO), page 4

Originally posted by ST SIR 86
reply to post by internos

---

Do you think that aliens know the level of technology in our mobile/camera phones, if so this could explain why they seem to always be just out of focus.

And do you think digital filming was introduced to mobile/cameras to make it easier for the powers to be to debunk sensitive issues as CGI's ?

My feeling is they maybe vibrate in an odd wavelength that makes them hard for us to see and photograph. maybe as camera tech keeps improving we will get clearer shots?

Originally posted by ST SIR 86
reply to post by internos

---

Do you think that aliens know the level of technology in our mobile/camera phones, if so this could explain why they seem to always be just out of focus.

I don't have proofs that aliens do exists, so it's too difficult to me to imagine what they know and what they don't

And do you think digital filming was introduced to mobile/cameras to make it easier for the powers to be to debunk sensitive issues as CGI's ?

This is a very intelligent question:
in my opinion, digital filming, in general, does make it easier to create hoaxes and more difficult to spot their fingerprints:

BUT

this could even be part of an agenda: now we have a situation in which genuine and hoaxes are mixed all together, and besides, unfortunately, often the most popular ufo videos are the fake ones:
so, if this is happening because someone planned it, well the agenda is working very well.

Just in case, for all UFO Hunters that just happen upon a UFO:


teslaandlyne (6 seconds ago)
A UV meter should be available, like this will happen, to pick up the sparking
response. If you are in a hot spot and expect more the UV reading might go up
and verify close by static emissions.

A good piece of equipment.
OVNI UFO VIDEO
www.youtube.com...

[edit on 4/17/2008 by TeslaandLyne]

reply to post by VisionQuest

---

Yeah, its the bottom of a bug sapper.

So thats what been flying around all these years.

Except the real static fliers are way more powerful.

ED:
U.F.O. and MYSTERY CLOUD APPEARS SAME PLACE!
www.youtube.com...

Real thing guys... chemcloud left behind.

Positive ions did their thing. I told you so.




[edit on 4/17/2008 by TeslaandLyne]

reply to post by TeslaandLyne

---

I feel ya Tesla. Im just saying its consistent with the design of outdoor patio heaters. It could be the real thing though , who knows.....

[edit on 17-4-2008 by VisionQuest]

Originally posted by VisionQuest
reply to post by TeslaandLyne

---

I feel ya Tesla. Im just saying its consistent with the design of outdoor patio heaters. I could be the real thing , who knows.....

What do you think of the cloud left behind:
www.youtube.com...

ED:

teslaandlyne (13 seconds ago)
luckymauro, your cloud left behind video makes perfect sense if a static ion charge was generated by that craft.

Put it on this one:
www.youtube.com...

ED+: I see the next post.. the cloud moved...


[edit on 4/17/2008 by TeslaandLyne]

[edit on 4/17/2008 by TeslaandLyne]

reply to post by TeslaandLyne

---

Well its certainly peculiar. I did a side by side comparison of the cloud video and the ufo video earlier in this thread. the two backyards look slightly different. observe where the fence meets the building. what happened?

reply to post by internos

---

Not really for me. I thought it was more peculiar that both the backyards looked diff. rather than a mere cloud.

reply to post by abovetech

---

Not altogether abovetech, Billy Meier saucer videos still vex the CGI people.

Hoaxers say its a hoax eventually, not the real ones.

Originally posted by VisionQuest
reply to post by internos

---

Not really for me. I thought it was more peculiar that both the backyards looked diff. rather than a mere cloud.

Do you and other posters expect the camera man to stand in exactly the same spot 2 days later while filming the cloud?
i dont think he even thought about this and IMHO i would call this CGI if he did stand in the same spot cause then we could call rehearsed.

reply to post by TeslaandLyne

---

The cloud was left behind 2 days later...what makes you think they are related and this isn't "Just a cloud"? Why did it take 2 days for the cloud to appear if it was left behind by the UFO?

Isn't it more likely that the cloud was just a cloud. I don't think it's unusual to see clouds in the sky, and I bet that cloud would have been there whether or not someone saw a UFO in that part of the sky 2 days earlier (plus it seems to me that the cloud was at a higher altitude than the UFO...but it's hard to tell exactly.)

EDIT TO ADD:

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Chemtrails last long after the high flying triangle craft goes by.

But that cloud moved in a hurry. Again I ask, why would the "air disturbed by the UFO" just sit there fo two days, then become a cloud, and then float off?

[edit on 4/17/2008 by Soylent Green Is People]

[edit on 4/17/2008 by Soylent Green Is People]

Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags

Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags

UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags

The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags

The Edge of Reality - Updated Report on the Illinois Police UFO case, January 5th, 2000.
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags

The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags

Famous Argentinean painter observed UFO studying parabolic antennas
  Posted 19 days ago with 21 member flags

1/28/2012 craft in sky From Puerto Rico - Need help getting more info!!
  Posted 6 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: